Header Logo

Connection

Joshua Melson to Colonoscopy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joshua Melson has written about Colonoscopy.
Joshua Melson
Connection Strength
8.057
Colonoscopy
  1. Equal Pay for Equal Screening: Impact of Patient and Provider Gender on Reimbursement for Screening Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2022 03; 67(3):739-741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.701
  2. Interobserver reliability of methods to determine complete resection of adenomas in colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2021 12; 53(12):1250-1255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.686
  3. Utilization of Census Tract-Based Neighborhood Poverty Rates to Predict Non-adherence to Screening Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 09; 64(9):2505-2513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.600
  4. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates: monitoring and reducing the worst-case scenario. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 10; 88(4):712-714.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.581
  5. Alternative approaches to polyp extraction in colonoscopy: a?proof of principle study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 09; 88(3):536-541.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.569
  6. Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2018 07; 32(7):3108-3113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.554
  7. Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar; 85(3):581-587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.503
  8. Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 09; 61(9):2496-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.492
  9. Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct; 60(10):2930-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.458
  10. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  11. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar; 56(3):315-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.395
  12. Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 08 01; 118(8):1410-1418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  13. Risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with both small tubular adenomas and serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 07; 96(1):95-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  14. Correlation of LINE-1 Hypomethylation With Size and Pathologic Extent of Dysplasia in Colorectal Tubular Adenomas. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 06 01; 12(6):e00369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  15. Segmental metachronous adenoma rate as a metric for monitoring incomplete resection in a colonoscopy screening program. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 08; 94(2):347-354.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  16. Connecting colonoscopy quality improvement initiatives with reduced rates of interval colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 08; 92(2):365-367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  17. AGA White Paper: Roadmap for the Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 11; 18(12):2667-2678.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  18. Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia on Surveillance Colonoscopy in Patients With Young- vs Older-onset of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 09; 19(9):1967-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  19. Managing the patient with colorectal adenomas found at an?early age. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 03; 87(3):674-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  20. Patients with small and diminutive proximal hyperplastic polyps have higher rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia compared with patients without serrated lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun; 87(6):1518-1526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  21. Presence of small sessile serrated polyps increases rate of?advanced neoplasia upon surveillance compared with isolated?low-risk tubular adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug; 84(2):307-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  22. Radiographic staging practices of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer vary according to medical specialty. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep; 82(3):497-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  23. Histopathology predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Sep; 53(9):1280-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  24. Crypt loss is a marker of clinical severity of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Am J Hematol. 2007 Oct; 82(10):881-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  25. Thermal ablation after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps: not only the margins, but also the base? Gut. 2023 Dec 07; 73(1):12-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  26. An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles. Gut. 2023 10; 72(10):1904-1918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  27. Devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of residual and fibrotic colorectal polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep; 92(3):474-482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  28. Report from the AGA Center for GI Innovation and Technology's Consensus Conference: Envisioning Next-Generation Paradigms in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2020 02; 158(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  29. Diminutive Polyps With Advanced Histologic Features Do Not Increase Risk for Metachronous Advanced Colon Neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2019 02; 156(3):623-634.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  30. DNA methylation patterns in blood of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous colorectal polyps. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 01; 131(5):1153-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.