Header Logo

Connection

Joshua Melson to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joshua Melson has written about Humans.
Joshua Melson
Connection Strength
1.259
Humans
  1. Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 08 01; 118(8):1410-1418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  2. Early steps on the pathway to develop quality metrics that have an impact on postendoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 09; 96(3):476-478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  3. The pathway to monitoring quality of care for patients with adenomatous oligopolyposis of unknown etiology. Endoscopy. 2022 07; 54(7):698-699.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  4. Risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with both small tubular adenomas and serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 07; 96(1):95-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  5. Equal Pay for Equal Screening: Impact of Patient and Provider Gender on Reimbursement for Screening Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2022 03; 67(3):739-741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  6. Correlation of LINE-1 Hypomethylation With Size and Pathologic Extent of Dysplasia in Colorectal Tubular Adenomas. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 06 01; 12(6):e00369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  7. Rev up your engines: a new approach to access the deep small bowel by motorized spiral enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 06; 93(6):1371-1372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  8. Video capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 04; 93(4):784-796.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  9. Interobserver reliability of methods to determine complete resection of adenomas in colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2021 12; 53(12):1250-1255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  10. Segmental metachronous adenoma rate as a metric for monitoring incomplete resection in a colonoscopy screening program. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 08; 94(2):347-354.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  11. Connecting colonoscopy quality improvement initiatives with reduced rates of interval colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 08; 92(2):365-367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  12. AGA White Paper: Roadmap for the Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 11; 18(12):2667-2678.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  13. Will magnet-assisted capsule endoscopy become a viable screening tool for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal varices? Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 04; 91(4):782-784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  14. Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia on Surveillance Colonoscopy in Patients With Young- vs Older-onset of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 09; 19(9):1967-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  15. Utilization of Census Tract-Based Neighborhood Poverty Rates to Predict Non-adherence to Screening Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 09; 64(9):2505-2513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  16. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates: monitoring and reducing the worst-case scenario. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 10; 88(4):712-714.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  17. Alternative approaches to polyp extraction in colonoscopy: a?proof of principle study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 09; 88(3):536-541.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  18. Managing the patient with colorectal adenomas found at an?early age. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 03; 87(3):674-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  19. Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2018 07; 32(7):3108-3113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  20. Patients with small and diminutive proximal hyperplastic polyps have higher rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia compared with patients without serrated lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun; 87(6):1518-1526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  21. LINE-1 is preferentially hypomethylated within adenomatous polyps in the presence of synchronous colorectal cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2017; 9:25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  22. Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar; 85(3):581-587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  23. Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 09; 61(9):2496-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  24. Presence of small sessile serrated polyps increases rate of?advanced neoplasia upon surveillance compared with isolated?low-risk tubular adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug; 84(2):307-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  25. Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct; 60(10):2930-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  26. Radiographic staging practices of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer vary according to medical specialty. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep; 82(3):497-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  27. Negative surveillance endoscopy occurs frequently in patients with short-segment non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2015 Oct; 28(7):660-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  28. Commonality and differences of methylation signatures in the plasma of patients with pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014 Jun 01; 134(11):2656-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  29. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  30. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar; 56(3):315-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  31. Dysplasia detection rate of confirmatory EGD in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2014 Aug; 27(6):505-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  32. Histopathology predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Sep; 53(9):1280-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  33. Crypt loss is a marker of clinical severity of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Am J Hematol. 2007 Oct; 82(10):881-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  34. Thermal ablation after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps: not only the margins, but also the base? Gut. 2023 Dec 07; 73(1):12-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  35. DNA methylation and miRNA expression in colon adenomas compared with matched normal colon mucosa and carcinomas. Int J Exp Pathol. 2022 06; 103(3):74-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  36. Devices for esophageal function testing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 01; 95(1):27-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  37. Devices and techniques for flexible endoscopic management of Zenker's diverticulum (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 07; 94(1):3-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  38. Enhanced EUS imaging (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 02; 93(2):323-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  39. Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 to Detect Recurrence of Stage II/Stage III Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 12; 29(12):2702-2709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  40. Endoscopic devices and techniques for the management of bariatric surgical adverse events (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep; 92(3):492-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  41. Techniques and devices for the endoscopic treatment of gastroparesis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep; 92(3):483-491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  42. Devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of residual and fibrotic colorectal polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep; 92(3):474-482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  43. Report from the AGA Center for GI Innovation and Technology's Consensus Conference: Envisioning Next-Generation Paradigms in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2020 02; 158(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  44. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 07; 90(1):1-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  45. Advances in the diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 09; 90(3):325-334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  46. Diminutive Polyps With Advanced Histologic Features Do Not Increase Risk for Metachronous Advanced Colon Neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2019 02; 156(3):623-634.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  47. Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 12; 16(12):1911-1918.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  48. Devices and methods to improve colonoscopy completion?(with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar; 87(3):625-634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  49. EUS-guided portal vein interventions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 05; 85(5):883-888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  50. Excess of proximal microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer in African Americans from a multiethnic study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 15; 20(18):4962-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  51. PI3K/AKT signaling is essential for communication between tissue-infiltrating mast cells, macrophages, and epithelial cells in colitis-induced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 May 01; 19(9):2342-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  52. DNA methylation patterns in blood of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous colorectal polyps. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 01; 131(5):1153-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  53. Prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr; 100(4):905-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.