Header Logo

Connection

Joshua Melson to Colorectal Neoplasms

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joshua Melson has written about Colorectal Neoplasms.
Joshua Melson
Connection Strength
11.330
Colorectal Neoplasms
  1. Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 08 01; 118(8):1410-1418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.757
  2. Risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with both small tubular adenomas and serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 07; 96(1):95-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.699
  3. Correlation of LINE-1 Hypomethylation With Size and Pathologic Extent of Dysplasia in Colorectal Tubular Adenomas. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 06 01; 12(6):e00369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.666
  4. Segmental metachronous adenoma rate as a metric for monitoring incomplete resection in a colonoscopy screening program. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 08; 94(2):347-354.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.651
  5. Connecting colonoscopy quality improvement initiatives with reduced rates of interval colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 08; 92(2):365-367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.628
  6. AGA White Paper: Roadmap for the Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 11; 18(12):2667-2678.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.625
  7. Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia on Surveillance Colonoscopy in Patients With Young- vs Older-onset of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 09; 19(9):1967-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.585
  8. Utilization of Census Tract-Based Neighborhood Poverty Rates to Predict Non-adherence to Screening Colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 09; 64(9):2505-2513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  9. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates: monitoring and reducing the worst-case scenario. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 10; 88(4):712-714.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  10. Managing the patient with colorectal adenomas found at an?early age. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 03; 87(3):674-676.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.531
  11. Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2018 07; 32(7):3108-3113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.527
  12. LINE-1 is preferentially hypomethylated within adenomatous polyps in the presence of synchronous colorectal cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2017; 9:25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.496
  13. Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar; 85(3):581-587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.479
  14. Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 09; 61(9):2496-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.468
  15. Presence of small sessile serrated polyps increases rate of?advanced neoplasia upon surveillance compared with isolated?low-risk tubular adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug; 84(2):307-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.464
  16. Radiographic staging practices of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer vary according to medical specialty. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep; 82(3):497-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.436
  17. Commonality and differences of methylation signatures in the plasma of patients with pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014 Jun 01; 134(11):2656-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.396
  18. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  19. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar; 56(3):315-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.376
  20. Thermal ablation after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps: not only the margins, but also the base? Gut. 2023 Dec 07; 73(1):12-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  21. An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles. Gut. 2023 10; 72(10):1904-1918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  22. Report from the AGA Center for GI Innovation and Technology's Consensus Conference: Envisioning Next-Generation Paradigms in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2020 02; 158(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  23. Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 12; 16(12):1911-1918.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  24. Excess of proximal microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer in African Americans from a multiethnic study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 15; 20(18):4962-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  25. PI3K/AKT signaling is essential for communication between tissue-infiltrating mast cells, macrophages, and epithelial cells in colitis-induced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 May 01; 19(9):2342-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  26. DNA methylation patterns in blood of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous colorectal polyps. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 01; 131(5):1153-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  27. Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 to Detect Recurrence of Stage II/Stage III Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 12; 29(12):2702-2709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  28. Devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of residual and fibrotic colorectal polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep; 92(3):474-482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.