Header Logo

Connection

Richard Fessler to Male

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Fessler has written about Male.
Richard Fessler
Connection Strength
2.347
Male
  1. Cervical Alignment Analysis Comparing Two-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Anterior Plate Fixation. World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep; 165:e597-e610.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  2. Expandable versus Static Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: 1-year Radiographic Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar; 159:e1-e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  3. Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive and Open Surgeries for Adult Spinal Deformity. World Neurosurg. 2021 11; 155:e301-e314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  4. Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Correction in Parkinson Disease: Retrospective Case Series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 11 16; 19(6):635-640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  5. Patient Expectations of Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2021 02; 146:e931-e939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  6. Comparison of radiographic parameters after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with semiconstrained translational versus rotational plate systems. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Aug; 183:105379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  7. Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion to Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: Utilization, Costs, and Adverse Events 2003 to 2014. Neurosurgery. 2019 02 01; 84(2):413-420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  8. Minimally invasive options for surgical management of adjacent segment disease of the lumbar spine. Neurol India. 2018 May-Jun; 66(3):755-762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  9. Assessment of Paraspinal Muscle Cross-sectional Area After Lumbar Decompression: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Approaches. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 04; 30(3):E162-E168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  10. "Push-Through" Rod Passage Technique for the Improvement of Lumbar Lordosis and Sagittal Balance in Minimally Invasive Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 10; 29(8):323-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  11. Acquired Spinal Arteriovenous Fistula Presenting as Brown-S?quard Syndrome and Endovascular Treatment Outcome. World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec; 96:613.e1-613.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  12. Incidence of graft extrusion following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb; 24:88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  13. Utility of Readmission Rates as a Quality of Care Measure and Predictors of Readmission Within 30 Days After Spinal Surgery: a Single-Center, Multivariate Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov; 40(22):1769-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  14. Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec; 23(6):798-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  15. A minimally invasive approach to defects of the pars interarticularis: Restoring function in competitive athletes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec; 139:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  16. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  17. The relationship between preoperative general mental health and postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2015 Jun; 76(6):672-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  18. Biomechanical effects of the transcondylar approach on the craniovertebral junction. Clin Anat. 2015 Jul; 28(5):683-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  19. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction. World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May; 22(5):487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  21. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct; 27(7):358-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  22. Accurate pedicle screw placement--a perspective statement. World Neurosurg. 2015 May; 83(5):747-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  23. Local cooling for traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Nov; 21(5):845-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  24. Nonexpandable tubular retractors and spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun; 20(6):769-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  25. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy. World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 81(3-4):634-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  26. Minimally invasive thoracic decompression for multi-level thoracic pathologies. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 21(3):467-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  27. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  28. Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug; 35(2):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  29. Microendoscopic decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul; 35(1):E8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  30. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic foraminotomy and decompression in the cervical spine. World Neurosurg. 2014 Feb; 81(2):422-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  31. Minimally invasive thoracic microendoscopic diskectomy: surgical technique and case series. World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct; 80(3-4):421-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  32. Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jan; 19(1):111-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  33. Perioperative results following open and minimally invasive single-level lumbar discectomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Dec; 18(12):1667-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  34. Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct; 18(10):1360-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  35. Minimally invasive approach for far lateral disc herniations: results from 20 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010 Jun; 53(3):122-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  36. Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb; 23(1):30-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  37. Minimally invasive resection of intramedullary ependymoma: case report. Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec; 65(6):E1203-4; discussion E1204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  38. Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct; 11(4):471-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  39. Minimally invasive posterolateral thoracic corpectomy: cadaveric feasibility study and report of four clinical cases. Neurosurgery. 2009 Apr; 64(4):746-52; discussion 752-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  40. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older. Neurosurgery. 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  41. Minimally invasive far lateral microendoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal disc herniation at the lumbosacral junction: cadaveric dissection and technical case report. Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug; 7(4):414-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  42. Cervical juxtafacet cysts: case report and literature review. Spine J. 2006 May-Jun; 6(3):279-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  43. Minimally invasive resection of intradural-extramedullary spinal neoplasms. Neurosurgery. 2006 Feb; 58(1 Suppl):ONS52-8; discussion ONS52-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  44. Is the X STOP interspinous implant a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication? Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006 Jan; 2(1):22-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  45. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Aug; 3(2):98-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  46. Thoracic microendoscopic discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Jul; 1(1):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  47. Microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent disc herniations. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Sep 15; 15(3):E11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  48. Clinical outcomes after minimal-access surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Sep 15; 15(3):E12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  49. Incremental benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery for increasingly frail patients with adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 08 01; 39(2):168-174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  50. Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S37-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  51. Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S60-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  52. Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: current practice and evolving techniques. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S96-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  53. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S129-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  54. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S146-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  55. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Consumption. Neurosurgery. 2021 02 16; 88(3):648-657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  56. Intermediate-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with less invasive adult spinal deformity surgery: patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 06; 162(6):1393-1400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  57. The MISDEF2 algorithm: an updated algorithm for patient selection in minimally invasive deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Oct 25; 32(2):221-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  58. Complex atlantoaxial fractures. J Neurosurg. 1999 Oct; 91(2 Suppl):139-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  59. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Mild-to-Moderate Adult Spinal Deformities: Impact on Intensive Care Unit and Hospital Stay. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul; 127:e649-e655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  60. Analysis of Complications with Staged Surgery for Less Invasive Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun; 126:e1337-e1342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  61. The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 01; 29(5):560-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  62. Patients with High Pelvic Tilt Achieve the Same Clinical Success as Those with Low Pelvic Tilt After Minimally Invasive Adult Deformity Surgery. Neurosurgery. 2018 08 01; 83(2):270-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  63. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 1998 Aug; 43(2):257-65; discussion 265-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  64. Home Versus Rehabilitation: Factors that Influence Disposition After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct; 118:e610-e615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  65. Re-operation After Long-Segment Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity: The Impact of Extending the Construct Below the Lumbar Spine. Neurosurgery. 2018 02 01; 82(2):211-219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  66. Impact of Anemia and Transfusion on Readmission and Length of Stay After Spinal Surgery: A Single-center Study of 1187 Operations. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1338-E1342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  67. Lateral extracavitary approach to the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine. Orthopedics. 1997 Jul; 20(7):605-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  68. A Critical Analysis of Sagittal Plane Deformity Correction With Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study. Spine Deform. 2017 07; 5(4):265-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  69. Does MIS Surgery Allow for Shorter Constructs in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity? Neurosurgery. 2017 03 01; 80(3):489-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  70. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  71. An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation. World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct; 94:255-260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  72. Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2016 08; 25(8):2605-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  73. Does Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Reduce Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2016 Jan; 78(1):101-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  74. Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar; 87:55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  75. Can a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Be Achieved in Elderly Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery? World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb; 86:168-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  76. The concave versus convex approach for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion for thoracolumbar degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Oct; 22(10):1588-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  77. Defensive medicine in neurosurgery: does state-level liability risk matter? Neurosurgery. 2015 Feb; 76(2):105-13; discussion 113-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  78. Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr; 22(4):374-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  79. Less invasive surgery for treating adult spinal deformities: ceiling effects for deformity correction with 3 different techniques. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May; 36(5):E12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  80. Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May; 36(5):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  81. Complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgical techniques. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May; 36(5):E15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  82. Biomechanical effects of a unilateral approach to minimally invasive lumbar decompression. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e92611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  83. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Spine J. 2014 Oct 01; 14(10):2405-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  84. Risk factors and long-term survival in adult patients with primary malignant spinal cord astrocytomas. J Neurooncol. 2013 12; 115(3):493-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  85. Measuring surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: assessment of minimum clinically important difference. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e67408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  86. Thoracic disc herniations. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1993 Jan; 4(1):75-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  87. The influence of transoral odontoid resection on stability of the craniovertebral junction. J Neurosurg. 1992 Oct; 77(4):525-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  88. Perspective--sacral Tarlov cyst: surgical treatment by clipping. World Neurosurg. 2013 Feb; 79(2):285.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  89. Epidural lipomatosis in steroid-treated patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Feb; 17(2):183-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  90. Abdominal complications following posterior spinal fusion in patients with previous abdominal surgeries. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct; 31(4):E16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  91. Lateral parascapular extrapleural approach to the upper thoracic spine. J Neurosurg. 1991 Sep; 75(3):349-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  92. Minimally invasive discectomy for the treatment of disc herniation causing cauda equina syndrome. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Sep; 18(9):1219-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  93. Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jul; 15(1):92-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  94. An alternate method for placement of C-1 screws. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Apr; 12(4):337-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  95. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):101-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  96. Maximizing the potential of minimally invasive spine surgery in complex spinal disorders. Neurosurg Focus. 2008; 25(2):E19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  97. Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006 Oct; 17(4):411-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  98. Instrumentation in patients with spinal infection. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Dec 15; 17(6):E7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  99. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lumbar synovial cysts. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jan; 54(1):107-11; discussion 111-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  100. Feasibility and safety of neural tissue transplantation in patients with syringomyelia. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Sep; 18(9):911-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  101. Primary reconstruction for spinal infections. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jun; 86(6):981-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  102. Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 01; 21(23):2786-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  103. Percutaneous lumbosacral fixation and fusion: anatomic study and two-year experience with a new method. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996 Jan; 7(1):99-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  104. Percutaneous lumbosacral fixation and fusion: anatomical study and two-year experience with a new method. Clin Neurosurg. 1996; 43:423-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  105. Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992 Dec; 77(6):860-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.