Header Logo

Connection

Richard Fessler to Lumbar Vertebrae

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Fessler has written about Lumbar Vertebrae.
Richard Fessler
Connection Strength
9.045
Lumbar Vertebrae
  1. Minimally invasive options for surgical management of adjacent segment disease of the lumbar spine. Neurol India. 2018 May-Jun; 66(3):755-762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.407
  2. Lumbar Radiculopathy in the Setting of Degenerative Scoliosis: MIS Decompression and Limited Correction are Better Options. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Jul; 28(3):335-339.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.378
  3. A minimally invasive approach to defects of the pars interarticularis: Restoring function in competitive athletes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec; 139:29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.338
  4. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction. World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.327
  5. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May; 22(5):487-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  6. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct; 27(7):358-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.317
  7. Accurate pedicle screw placement--a perspective statement. World Neurosurg. 2015 May; 83(5):747-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.316
  8. Minimally invasive versus open laminotomy. Spine J. 2014 Jun 01; 14(6):1081-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.310
  9. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.293
  10. Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jan; 19(1):111-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  11. Perioperative results following open and minimally invasive single-level lumbar discectomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Dec; 18(12):1667-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.257
  12. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep; 55(3):259-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.256
  13. Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct; 18(10):1360-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  14. Minimally invasive approach for far lateral disc herniations: results from 20 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010 Jun; 53(3):122-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  15. Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb; 23(1):30-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  16. Biomechanical comparison of traditional and minimally invasive intradural tumor exposures using finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Feb; 24(2):143-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  17. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 01; 34(1):17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  18. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2008 Nov; 63(5):956-60; discussion 960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  19. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older. Neurosurgery. 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  20. Minimally invasive far lateral microendoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal disc herniation at the lumbosacral junction: cadaveric dissection and technical case report. Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug; 7(4):414-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  21. Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15; 30(16 Suppl):S73-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  22. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Aug; 3(2):98-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  23. Microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent disc herniations. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Sep 15; 15(3):E11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  24. Clinical outcomes after minimal-access surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Sep 15; 15(3):E12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  25. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 09 01; 39(3):394-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  26. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2003 Jun; 52(6):1512.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  27. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S129-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  28. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S146-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  29. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S166-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  30. A Modified Approach for Minimally Invasive Tubular Microdiscectomy for Far Lateral Disc Herniations: Docking at the Caudal Level Transverse Process. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 05; 58(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  31. Expandable versus Static Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: 1-year Radiographic Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar; 159:e1-e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  32. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Consumption. Neurosurgery. 2021 02 16; 88(3):648-657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  33. The role of anterior lumbar interbody allograft bone dowel fusion as an adjunct to posterior segmental lumbar fixation. Clin Neurosurg. 2000; 47:528-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  34. The MISDEF2 algorithm: an updated algorithm for patient selection in minimally invasive deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Oct 25; 32(2):221-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  35. The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 01; 29(5):560-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  36. Variability in Assessing Spinopelvic Parameters With Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Among Spine Surgeons. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 06 15; 43(12):813-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  37. Assessment of Paraspinal Muscle Cross-sectional Area After Lumbar Decompression: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Approaches. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 04; 30(3):E162-E168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  38. Outcome analysis in lumbar spine: instabilities/degenerative disease. Clin Neurosurg. 1997; 44:297-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  39. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  40. Incidence of graft extrusion following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb; 24:88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  41. Can a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Be Achieved in Elderly Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery? World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb; 86:168-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  42. The concave versus convex approach for minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion for thoracolumbar degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Oct; 22(10):1588-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  43. The relationship between preoperative general mental health and postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2015 Jun; 76(6):672-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  44. Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: outcomes and deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr; 25(2):353-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  45. Biomechanical effects of a unilateral approach to minimally invasive lumbar decompression. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e92611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  46. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy. World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 81(3-4):634-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  47. Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug; 35(2):E13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  48. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct; 31(4):E4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  49. Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jul; 15(1):92-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  50. Evaluation of change in muscle activity as a result of posterior lumbar spine surgery using a dynamic modeling system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jul 15; 35(16):E761-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  51. The development of minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006 Oct; 17(4):401-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  52. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lumbar synovial cysts. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jan; 54(1):107-11; discussion 111-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  53. Bone grafting. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Feb 15; 14(2):e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  54. Preoperative Transvenous Liquid Embolization for a Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Epidural Varix Mimicking Radiculopathy. Neurol India. 2022 May-Jun; 70(3):1176-1179.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  55. Two- and three-year outcomes of minimally invasive and hybrid correction of adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 04 01; 36(4):595-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  56. Re-operation After Long-Segment Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity: The Impact of Extending the Construct Below the Lumbar Spine. Neurosurgery. 2018 02 01; 82(2):211-219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  57. Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar; 87:55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  58. Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992 Dec; 77(6):860-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  59. Maximizing the potential of minimally invasive spine surgery in complex spinal disorders. Neurosurg Focus. 2008; 25(2):E19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.