Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Markus Wimmer and Hannah Lundberg.
Connection Strength

4.522
  1. Comparison of Antagonist Muscle Activity During Walking Between Total Knee Replacement and Control Subjects Using Unnormalized Electromyography. J Arthroplasty. 2016 06; 31(6):1331-1339.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.563
  2. Methods for locating the tibio-femoral contact pathway in total knee replacements using marker-based gait analysis and standard radiography. Iowa Orthop J. 2014; 34:94-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.491
  3. Computational Framework for Determining Patient-Specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Loading. J Med Device. 2013 Dec; 7(4):0409041-409041.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.489
  4. Fine tuning total knee replacement contact force prediction algorithms using blinded model validation. J Biomech Eng. 2013 Feb; 135(2):021015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.461
  5. Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012 Mar; 226(3):227-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.432
  6. Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns. J Biomech. 2012 Apr 05; 45(6):990-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.430
  7. A parametric approach to numerical modeling of TKR contact forces. J Biomech. 2009 Mar 11; 42(4):541-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  8. Development of a computational-experimental framework for enhanced mechanical characterization and cross-species comparison of the articular cartilage superficial zone. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2023 Sep 09; 1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  9. Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 01; 125:104939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  10. Sensitivity of total knee replacement wear to variability in motion and load input: A parametric finite element analysis study. J Orthop Res. 2020 07; 38(7):1538-1549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  11. The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3. J Biomech. 2019 May 09; 88:104-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  12. Finite element evaluation of the newest ISO testing standard for polyethylene total knee replacement liners. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Jun; 232(6):545-552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  13. Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties? J Arthroplasty. 2017 07; 32(7):2268-2273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  14. Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  15. Can a gait-dependent model predict wear on retrieved total knee arthroplasty components? Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):129-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  16. A reduction in the knee adduction moment with medial thrust gait is associated with a medial shift in center of plantar pressure. Med Eng Phys. 2016 07; 38(7):615-621.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  17. Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.