Markus Wimmer to Polyethylene
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Markus Wimmer has written about Polyethylene.
Connection Strength
2.310
-
Wear Characteristics of Conventional Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2018 11; 39(11):1335-1344.
Score: 0.542
-
How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug; 474(8):1867-75.
Score: 0.458
-
An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Apr; 101(3):449-57.
Score: 0.360
-
Surface damage versus tibial polyethylene insert conformity: a retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul; 470(7):1814-25.
Score: 0.356
-
Joint line elevation and tibial slope are associated with increased polyethylene wear in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Orthop Res. 2020 07; 38(7):1596-1606.
Score: 0.154
-
Prediction of Polyethylene Wear Rates from Gait Biomechanics and Implant Positioning in Total Hip Replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug; 475(8):2027-2042.
Score: 0.123
-
Polyethylene and metal wear particles: characteristics and biological effects. Semin Immunopathol. 2011 May; 33(3):257-71.
Score: 0.081
-
Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb; 17(2):69-76.
Score: 0.070
-
Analysis of retrieved acetabular components of three polyethylene types. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec; 465:140-9.
Score: 0.065
-
Sensitivity of total knee replacement wear to variability in motion and load input: A parametric finite element analysis study. J Orthop Res. 2020 07; 38(7):1538-1549.
Score: 0.039
-
The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3. J Biomech. 2019 May 09; 88:104-112.
Score: 0.035
-
How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3747-58.
Score: 0.026