Markus Wimmer to Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Markus Wimmer has written about Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip.
Connection Strength
3.904
-
Prediction of Polyethylene Wear Rates from Gait Biomechanics and Implant Positioning in Total Hip Replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug; 475(8):2027-2042.
Score: 0.328
-
How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug; 474(8):1867-75.
Score: 0.305
-
An important contribution to our understanding of the performance of the current generation of metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Apr 17; 95(8):e53.
Score: 0.251
-
Does hip implant positioning affect the peak external adduction moments of the healthy knees of subjects with total hip replacements? J Orthop Res. 2013 Aug; 31(8):1187-94.
Score: 0.249
-
Contralateral hip and knee gait biomechanics are unchanged by total hip replacement for unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2012 Jan; 35(1):61-5.
Score: 0.224
-
In vivo wear of a squeaky alumina-on-alumina hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 06; 93(7):e27.
Score: 0.218
-
Differences in preferred walking speeds in a gait laboratory compared with the real world after total hip replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep; 91(9):1390-5.
Score: 0.209
-
Wear mechanisms in metal-on-metal bearings: the importance of tribochemical reaction layers. J Orthop Res. 2010 Apr; 28(4):436-43.
Score: 0.203
-
Relative importance of gait vs. joint positioning on hip contact forces after total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 2009 Dec; 27(12):1576-82.
Score: 0.198
-
[Implant wear and aseptic loosening. An overview]. Orthopade. 2009 Aug; 38(8):690-7.
Score: 0.194
-
Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb; 17(2):69-76.
Score: 0.187
-
Do gait adaptations during stair climbing result in changes in implant forces in subjects with total hip replacements compared to normal subjects? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Jul; 23(6):754-61.
Score: 0.177
-
Preoperative gait adaptations persist one year after surgery in clinically well-functioning total hip replacement patients. J Biomech. 2007; 40(15):3432-7.
Score: 0.168
-
Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Oct; 88(10):1401-5.
Score: 0.159
-
A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6):918-21.
Score: 0.158
-
Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
Score: 0.108
-
How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3747-58.
Score: 0.070
-
CoCrMo metal-on-metal hip replacements. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013 Jan 21; 15(3):746-56.
Score: 0.062
-
Wear-corrosion synergism in a CoCrMo hip bearing alloy is influenced by proteins. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov; 470(11):3109-17.
Score: 0.061
-
Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 17; 94(20):1877-85.
Score: 0.060
-
New insights into hard phases of CoCrMo metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Aug; 12:39-49.
Score: 0.058
-
Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches--a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech. 2011 Feb 03; 44(3):372-8.
Score: 0.053
-
Analysis of retrieved acetabular components of three polyethylene types. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec; 465:140-9.
Score: 0.043
-
[Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses]. Orthopade. 2005 Nov; 34(11):1131-6.
Score: 0.037
-
Subsurface microstructure of metal-on-metal hip joints and its relationship to wear particle generation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jan 15; 72(1):206-14.
Score: 0.035
-
The influence of resting periods on friction in the artificial hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb; (407):127-38.
Score: 0.031
-
European multidisciplinary consensus statement on the use and monitoring of metal-on-metal bearings for total hip replacement and hip resurfacing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 May; 99(3):263-71.
Score: 0.016
-
Consensus statement "Current evidence on the management of metal-on-metal bearings"--April 16, 2012. Hip Int. 2013 Jan-Feb; 23(1):2-5.
Score: 0.015
-
Graphitic tribological layers in metal-on-metal hip replacements. Science. 2011 Dec 23; 334(6063):1687-90.
Score: 0.014
-
Influence of head size on the development of metallic wear and on the characteristics of carbon layers in metal-on-metal hip joints. Acta Orthop. 2009 Jun; 80(3):283-90.
Score: 0.012