Header Logo

Connection

Denis Nam to Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Denis Nam has written about Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip.
Denis Nam
Connection Strength
9.990
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  1. Contralateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Staged Within Six Weeks Increases the Risk of Adverse Events Compared to Unilateral Surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7 Suppl 2):S314-S318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.470
  2. Saline lavage after a "dry tap". Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):138-144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.394
  3. Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S359-S363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  4. Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem? J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S278-S283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.384
  5. CORR Insights?: What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 02; 477(2):380-382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  6. An evaluation of proximal femur bone density in young, active patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at one year postoperatively. Hip Int. 2019 Jan; 29(1):51-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  7. Age and Early Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 01; 40(6):e1069-e1073.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.330
  8. Metal Ion Levels in Young, Active Patients Receiving a Modular, Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 05; 32(5):1581-1585.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  9. The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty on Pelvic Motion and Functional Component Position is Highly Variable. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1200-1205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.308
  10. Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2115-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  11. Is the Direct Superior, Iliotibial Band-Sparing Approach Associated With Decreased Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 02; 32(2):453-457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  12. Proximal Femur Bone Density Decreases up to 5 Years After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young, Active Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2016 12; 31(12):2825-2830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  13. Residual Symptoms and Function in Young, Active Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Comparable to Normative Controls? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1492-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  14. Patient-Reported Metal Allergy: A Risk Factor for Poor Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9):1910-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.293
  15. The Effectiveness of a Risk Stratification Protocol for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 06; 31(6):1299-1306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  16. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States. Orthopedics. 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.282
  17. Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hip Arthroplasty: Routine and High Risk Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  18. Metal Ion Concentrations in Young, Active Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Use of Modern Bearing Couples. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2227-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  19. Incidence and Location of Pain in Young, Active Patients Following Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov; 30(11):1971-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.278
  20. The Impact of Study Period on Perioperative Outcomes Following Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul; 30(7):1167-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  21. Does a prior hip arthroscopy affect clinical outcomes in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Nov; 43(11):E255-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.268
  22. Radiographic parameters associated with pain following total hip and surface arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar; 30(3):495-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.267
  23. The use of warfarin for DVT prophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty: how often are patients within their target INR range? J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb; 30(2):315-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  24. What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3665-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.257
  25. Acetabular component positioning in primary THA via an anterior, posterolateral, or posterolateral-navigated surgical technique. Orthopedics. 2013 Dec; 36(12):e1482-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  26. Leg-length inequalities following THA based on surgical technique. Orthopedics. 2013 Apr; 36(4):e395-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  27. A comparison of two resurfacing arthroplasty implants: medium-term clinical and radiographic results. Hip Int. 2012 Sep-Oct; 22(5):566-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  28. The safety and efficacy of one-stage bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2012 Jan-Feb; 22(1):100-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  29. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S206-S210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  30. Short-Term Indwelling Foley Catheters Do Not Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Uncomplicated Primary THA and TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 02 15; 105(4):312-319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  31. The Optimal Dosing Regimen for Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 04; 102(21):1883-1890.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  32. Education Increases Disposal of Unused Opioids After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 03; 102(11):953-960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  33. Are Postoperative Hip Precautions Necessary After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Posterior Approach? Preliminary Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S246-S251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  34. Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 02; 35(2):538-543.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  35. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age at a Mean of 16 Years: Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Significantly Reduces the Risk of Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S238-S241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  36. Adverse Local Tissue Reaction After a Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prosthesis Without Elevated Serum Metal Ion Levels. Orthopedics. 2018 May 01; 41(3):e438-e441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  37. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Clostridium difficile Colitis Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):205-210.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  38. Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 03; 32(3):987-991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  39. Socioeconomically Disadvantaged CMS Beneficiaries Do Not Benefit From the Readmission Reduction Initiatives. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2082-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  40. The Impact of Risk Reduction Initiatives on Readmission: THA and TKA Readmission Rates. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2057-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  41. Targeting a New Safe Zone: A Step in the Development of Patient-Specific Component Positioning for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Jun; 44(6):270-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  42. The impact of total joint arthroplasty on sexual function in young, active patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb; 30(2):335-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  43. Zirconia phase transformation, metal transfer, and surface roughness in retrieved ceramic composite femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov; 29(11):2219-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  44. Durable fixation achieved with medialized, high hip center cementless THAs for Crowe II and III dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):630-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  45. Dual-mobility acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Oct; 42(10):473-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  46. Preoperative templating and its intraoperative applications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Dec; 41(12):E157-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  47. Who Is Prescribing Opioids Preoperatively? A Survey of New Patients Presenting to Tertiary Care Adult Reconstruction Clinics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Apr 01; 28(7):301-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  48. Decreased Hospital Costs and Surgical Site Infection Incidence With a Universal Decolonization Protocol in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 03; 32(3):728-734.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.