Header Logo

Connection

Denis Nam to Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Denis Nam has written about Aged.
Denis Nam
Connection Strength
2.506
Aged
  1. Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern? Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):51-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  2. Saline lavage after a "dry tap". Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):138-144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  3. Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 03; 101(13):1185-1192.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  4. External Validity of a New Prediction Model for Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug; 34(8):1677-1681.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  5. The Impact of an Acute, Traumatic Wound Dehiscence on Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2613-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  6. Adverse Local Tissue Reaction After a Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prosthesis Without Elevated Serum Metal Ion Levels. Orthopedics. 2018 May 01; 41(3):e438-e441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  7. Age and Early Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 01; 40(6):e1069-e1073.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  8. No impact of under-correction and joint line obliquity on clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for the varus knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May; 26(5):1506-1514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  9. Perioperative and Early Postoperative Comparison of a Modern Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Design. J Arthroplasty. 2017 07; 32(7):2151-2155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  10. What Is the Frequency of Noise Generation in Modern Knee Arthroplasty and Is It Associated With Residual Symptoms? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan; 475(1):83-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  11. Metal Ion Levels in Young, Active Patients Receiving a Modular, Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 05; 32(5):1581-1585.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  12. The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty on Pelvic Motion and Functional Component Position is Highly Variable. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1200-1205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  13. Is the Direct Superior, Iliotibial Band-Sparing Approach Associated With Decreased Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 02; 32(2):453-457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  14. Proximal Femur Bone Density Decreases up to 5 Years After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young, Active Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2016 12; 31(12):2825-2830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Failure at the Tibial Cement-Implant Interface With the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 11; 31(11):2579-2582.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  16. Does Use of a Variable Distal Femur Resection Angle Improve Radiographic Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):91-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  17. The Impact of Imaging Modality on the Measurement of Coronal Plane Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 10; 31(10):2314-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  18. Residual Symptoms and Function After Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparable to Normative Controls? J Arthroplasty. 2016 10; 31(10):2161-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  19. Patient-Reported Metal Allergy: A Risk Factor for Poor Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9):1910-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  20. The Mark Coventry Award: Custom Cutting Guides Do Not Improve Total Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan; 474(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  21. The Effectiveness of a Risk Stratification Protocol for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 06; 31(6):1299-1306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  22. The Inadequacy of Short Knee Radiographs in Evaluating Coronal Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr; 31(4):878-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  23. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States. Orthopedics. 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  24. Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hip Arthroplasty: Routine and High Risk Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  25. Inconsistent Patient Responses May Limit the Value of Using Multiple Total Knee Arthroplasty Assessment Tools to Define Implant Performance. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9):1518-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  26. The Impact of Study Period on Perioperative Outcomes Following Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul; 30(7):1167-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  27. Planned Bone Resections Using an MRI-Based Custom Cutting Guide System Versus 3-Dimensional, Weight-Bearing Images in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Apr; 30(4):567-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  28. Mobile compression devices and aspirin for VTE prophylaxis following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar; 30(3):447-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  29. The use of warfarin for DVT prophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty: how often are patients within their target INR range? J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb; 30(2):315-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  30. Relationship of the posterior femoral axis of the "kinematically aligned" total knee arthroplasty to the posterior condylar, transepicondylar, and anteroposterior femoral axes. Knee. 2014 Dec; 21(6):1120-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  31. Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0? and 90? in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Dec; 22(12):2975-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  32. Acetabular component positioning in primary THA via an anterior, posterolateral, or posterolateral-navigated surgical technique. Orthopedics. 2013 Dec; 36(12):e1482-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  33. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):288-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  34. Is tibiofemoral subluxation correctable in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct; 28(9):1575-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  35. Leg-length inequalities following THA based on surgical technique. Orthopedics. 2013 Apr; 36(4):e395-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  36. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2013 Aug; 20(4):263-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  37. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):255-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  38. Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Oct; 27(9):1717-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  39. The safety and efficacy of one-stage bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2012 Jan-Feb; 22(1):100-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  40. The effect of medial condylar bone loss of the knee on coronal plane stability--a cadaveric study. Knee. 2012 Oct; 19(5):640-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  41. Cadaveric results of an accelerometer based, extramedullary navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012 Oct; 19(5):617-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  42. Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec; 26(8):1527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  43. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct; 19(7):1003-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  44. The Effectiveness of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Versus Silver-Impregnated Dressings in Mitigating Surgical Site Complications in High-Risk Patients After Revision Knee Arthroplasty: The PROMISES Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7S):S295-S302.e14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  45. The Optimal Dosing Regimen for Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 04; 102(21):1883-1890.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  46. Education Increases Disposal of Unused Opioids After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 03; 102(11):953-960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  47. The Efficacy and Safety of Opioids in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Direct Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2020 10; 35(10):2759-2771.e13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  48. Physical Therapy on Postoperative Day Zero Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 394 Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S173-S177.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  49. The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Large Opioid Prescriptions Are Unnecessary After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A?Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S4-S10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  50. Synovial Fluid Alpha-Defensin Is an Adjunctive Tool in the Equivocal Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 11; 33(11):3537-3540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  51. How Common-and How Serious- Is Clostridium difficile Colitis After Geriatric Hip Fracture? Findings from the NSQIP Dataset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 03; 476(3):453-462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  52. TKA patients with unsatisfying knee function show changes in neuromotor synergy pattern but not joint biomechanics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Dec; 37:90-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  53. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Clostridium difficile Colitis Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):205-210.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  54. Low Rates of Aseptic Tibial Loosening in Obese Patients With Use of High-Viscosity Cement and Standard Tibial Tray: 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S183-S186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  55. Younger patients have less severe radiographic disease and lower reported outcome scores than older patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2017 Jun; 24(3):663-669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  56. Decreased Hospital Costs and Surgical Site Infection Incidence With a Universal Decolonization Protocol in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 03; 32(3):728-734.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  57. Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 03; 32(3):987-991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  58. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves congruence and restores joint space width of the lateral compartment. Knee. 2016 Jun; 23(3):501-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  59. The Impact of Prior Surgery after Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2017 Jan; 30(1):57-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  60. Socioeconomically Disadvantaged CMS Beneficiaries Do Not Benefit From the Readmission Reduction Initiatives. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2082-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  61. The Impact of Risk Reduction Initiatives on Readmission: THA and TKA Readmission Rates. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec; 30(12):2057-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  62. Targeting a New Safe Zone: A Step in the Development of Patient-Specific Component Positioning for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Jun; 44(6):270-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  63. Lower limb alignment control: is it more challenging in lateral compared to medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty? Knee. 2015 Sep; 22(4):347-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  64. Evaluation of two appropriateness criteria for total knee replacement. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Nov; 66(11):1749-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  65. Inter-observer precision and physiologic variability of mri landmarks used to determine rotational alignment in conventional and patient-specific TKA. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb; 30(2):290-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  66. Zirconia phase transformation, metal transfer, and surface roughness in retrieved ceramic composite femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov; 29(11):2219-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  67. Intraarticular analgesia versus epidural plus femoral nerve block after TKA: a randomized, double-blind trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May; 472(5):1400-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  68. Durable fixation achieved with medialized, high hip center cementless THAs for Crowe II and III dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):630-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  69. Recutting the distal femur to increase maximal knee extension during TKA causes coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion. Knee. 2012 Dec; 19(6):875-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  70. Observations on retrieved glenoid components from total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18(3):371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.