Header Logo

Connection

Joshua Jacobs to Prosthesis Design

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joshua Jacobs has written about Prosthesis Design.
Joshua Jacobs
Connection Strength
4.831
Prosthesis Design
  1. An important contribution to our understanding of the performance of the current generation of metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Apr 17; 95(8):e53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  2. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  3. Evaluation and treatment of painful total hip arthroplasties with modular metal taper junctions. Orthopedics. 2012 May; 35(5):386-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.339
  4. Differences in the fretting corrosion of metal-metal and ceramic-metal modular junctions of total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 2004 Mar; 22(2):250-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  5. Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 09 01; 479(9):2083-2096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  6. Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern? Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):51-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  7. Risk Stratification Algorithm for Management of Head-Neck Taper Tribocorrosion in Patients with Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty: Consensus Statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and The Hip Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 03 03; 103(5):e18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  8. Adverse Local Tissue Reaction due to Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion Presenting as Late Instability Following Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 09; 35(9):2666-2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  9. What Surgeons Need to Know About Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S55-S59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  10. High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1395-1399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  11. What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2707-2711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  12. Diagnosing Taper Corrosion: When Is It the Taper and When Is It Something Else? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2712-2715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  13. Mechanical, chemical and biological damage modes within head-neck tapers of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V contemporary hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 07; 106(5):1672-1685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  14. Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions?Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total?Hip?Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S272-S277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  15. Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction: Why Is This Happening Now? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1378-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  16. Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug; 473(8):2521-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  17. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  18. Do retrieval analysis and blood metal measurements contribute to our understanding of adverse local tissue reactions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3718-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  19. Metal ion levels in maternal and placental blood after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Dec; 43(12):E304-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  20. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov; 29(11):2060-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  21. Do ion concentrations after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing increase over time? A prospective study. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Apr; 28(4):695-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  22. Asymptomatic prospective and retrospective cohorts with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty indicate acquired lymphocyte reactivity varies with metal ion levels on a group basis. J Orthop Res. 2013 Feb; 31(2):173-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  23. Wear mechanisms in metal-on-metal bearings: the importance of tribochemical reaction layers. J Orthop Res. 2010 Apr; 28(4):436-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  24. Biologic activity of wear particles. Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59:3-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  25. Biologic effects of implant debris. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(2):182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  26. How has the biologic reaction to wear particles changed with newer bearing surfaces? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16 Suppl 1:S49-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  27. Analysis of retrieved acetabular components of three polyethylene types. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec; 465:140-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  28. Ion production and excretion in a patient with a metal-on-metal bearing hip prosthesis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec; 89(12):2758-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  29. Trends in joint arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery, wear-resistant materials, and biologics. J Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Jun; 13(3):153-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  30. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Nov; 14(12):646-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  31. Serum metal levels and bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):47-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  32. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun; 88(6):1171-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  33. The biology of alternative bearing surfaces in total joint arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2005; 54:481-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  34. A consensus paper on metal ions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):12-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  35. Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  36. Accumulation in liver and spleen of metal particles generated at nonbearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):94-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  37. Has Wrought Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy Changed for the Worse Over Time? J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S280-S284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  38. Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy associated with elevated serum cobalt and accelerated wear of a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Jun 27; 15(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  39. Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  40. Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  41. Echocardiographic Changes in the Context of Metal-on-Metal Versus Nonmetal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 11; 35(11):3230-3236.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  42. Alloy Microstructure Dictates Corrosion Modes in THA Modular Junctions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec; 475(12):3026-3043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  43. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  44. Modern trunnions are more flexible: a mechanical analysis of THA taper designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3963-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  45. Midterm results of a femoral stem with a modular neck design: clinical outcomes and metal ion analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9):1768-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  46. Surface damage versus tibial polyethylene insert conformity: a retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul; 470(7):1814-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  47. Evidence-based understanding of management perils for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):20-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  48. In vivo wear of a squeaky alumina-on-alumina hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 06; 93(7):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  49. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  50. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  51. In vivo severe corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement of retrieved modular body titanium alloy hip-implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Jan; 88(1):206-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  52. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul; 20(3):185-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  53. A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6):918-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  54. Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Aug; 21(5):754-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  55. The acetabular insert-metal backing interface: an additional source of polyethylene wear debris. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7):914-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  56. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  57. Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: lessons learned from retrieval studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):10-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  58. Coventry Award paper. Backsurface wear and deformation in polyethylene tibial inserts retrieved postmortem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov; (404):14-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  59. Surface damage in machined ram-extruded and net-shape molded retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Sep; 84(9):1534-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  60. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Aug; (401):149-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  61. Implant design affects markers of bone resorption and formation in total hip replacement. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 May; 17(5):800-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.