Header Logo

Connection

Joshua Jacobs to Hip Prosthesis

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Joshua Jacobs has written about Hip Prosthesis.
Joshua Jacobs
Connection Strength
13.359
Hip Prosthesis
  1. Adverse Local Tissue Reaction due to Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion Presenting as Late Instability Following Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 09; 35(9):2666-2670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.479
  2. What Surgeons Need to Know About Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S55-S59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  3. What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2707-2711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.416
  4. Diagnosing Taper Corrosion: When Is It the Taper and When Is It Something Else? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2712-2715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.414
  5. Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions?Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total?Hip?Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S272-S277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  6. Serum Metal Concentrations in Patients With Titanium Ceramic Composite Cervical Disc Replacements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar 15; 42(6):366-371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  7. Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction: Why Is This Happening Now? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1378-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  8. Nanoscale surface modification by anodic oxidation increased bone ingrowth and reduced fibrous tissue in the porous coating of titanium-alloy femoral hip arthroplasty implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 02; 105(2):283-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  9. Reply to letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec; 473(12):3983-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  10. Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug; 473(8):2521-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.346
  11. Do retrieval analysis and blood metal measurements contribute to our understanding of adverse local tissue reactions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3718-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.330
  12. Metal ion levels in maternal and placental blood after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Dec; 43(12):E304-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.330
  13. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov; 29(11):2060-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  14. Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15; 95(10):865-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.297
  15. An important contribution to our understanding of the performance of the current generation of metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Apr 17; 95(8):e53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  16. Ten-year outcome of serum metal ion levels after primary total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up of a previous report*. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20; 95(6):512-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.293
  17. Do ion concentrations after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing increase over time? A prospective study. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Apr; 28(4):695-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  18. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  19. Asymptomatic prospective and retrospective cohorts with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty indicate acquired lymphocyte reactivity varies with metal ion levels on a group basis. J Orthop Res. 2013 Feb; 31(2):173-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.282
  20. Evaluation and treatment of painful total hip arthroplasties with modular metal taper junctions. Orthopedics. 2012 May; 35(5):386-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.276
  21. The utility of MARS MRI in patients with metal-on-metal bearings: commentary on an article by Alister J. Hart, MA, MD, FRCSG(Orth), et al.: "Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses. a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging". J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 15; 94(4):e26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  22. In vivo oxide-induced stress corrosion cracking of Ti-6Al-4V in a neck-stem modular taper: Emergent behavior in a new mechanism of in vivo corrosion. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 Feb; 100(2):584-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.268
  23. Commentary on an article by Stephen S. Tower, MD: "Arthroprosthetic cobaltism: neurological and cardiac manifestations in two patients with metal-on-metal arthroplasty. a case report". J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 01; 92(17):e35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  24. Wear mechanisms in metal-on-metal bearings: the importance of tribochemical reaction layers. J Orthop Res. 2010 Apr; 28(4):436-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  25. Biologic activity of wear particles. Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59:3-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  26. Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb; 17(2):69-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  27. Analysis of retrieved acetabular components of three polyethylene types. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec; 465:140-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  28. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Nov; 14(12):646-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  29. Serum metal levels and bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):47-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  30. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun; 88(6):1171-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  31. A consensus paper on metal ions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):12-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  32. Can metal levels be used to monitor metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties? J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):59-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  33. Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  34. Accumulation in liver and spleen of metal particles generated at nonbearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8 Suppl 3):94-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  35. Differences in the fretting corrosion of metal-metal and ceramic-metal modular junctions of total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 2004 Mar; 22(2):250-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  36. Comparison of two and three-dimensional computerized polyethylene wear analysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jun; 85(6):1111-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  37. Has Wrought Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy Changed for the Worse Over Time? J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S280-S284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  38. Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy associated with elevated serum cobalt and accelerated wear of a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Jun 27; 15(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  39. A question of prevalence: liner dislodgment in Harris-Galante acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jan; 84(1):143-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  40. Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 09 01; 479(9):2083-2096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  41. The role of Vitamin E in hip implant-related corrosion and toxicity: Initial outcome. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 11; 123:104769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  42. Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  43. Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  44. Echocardiographic Changes in the Context of Metal-on-Metal Versus Nonmetal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 11; 35(11):3230-3236.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  45. High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1395-1399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  46. Metal wear particles in hematopoietic marrow of the axial skeleton in patients with prior revision for mechanical failure of a hip or knee arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 08; 107(6):1930-1936.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  47. In vitro simulation of fretting-corrosion in hip implant modular junctions: The influence of pH. Med Eng Phys. 2018 02; 52:1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  48. Adverse Local Tissue Reaction After a Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prosthesis Without Elevated Serum Metal Ion Levels. Orthopedics. 2018 May 01; 41(3):e438-e441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  49. Alloy Microstructure Dictates Corrosion Modes in THA Modular Junctions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec; 475(12):3026-3043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  50. Mechanical, chemical and biological damage modes within head-neck tapers of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V contemporary hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 07; 106(5):1672-1685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  51. Females with Unexplained Joint Pain Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Exhibit a Higher Rate and Severity of Hypersensitivity to Implant Metals Compared with Males: Implications of Sex-Based Bioreactivity Differences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Apr 19; 99(8):621-628.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  52. Aseptic Lymphocytic-Dominated Vasculitis-Associated Lesions Scores Do Not Correlate With Metal Ion Levels or Unreadable Synovial Fluid White Blood Cell Counts. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1340-1343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  53. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  54. Fretting-corrosion behavior in hip implant modular junctions: The influence of friction energy and pH variation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 09; 62:570-587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  55. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  56. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  57. Modern trunnions are more flexible: a mechanical analysis of THA taper designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3963-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  58. Midterm results of a femoral stem with a modular neck design: clinical outcomes and metal ion analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9):1768-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  59. Wear-corrosion synergism in a CoCrMo hip bearing alloy is influenced by proteins. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov; 470(11):3109-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  60. Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 17; 94(20):1877-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  61. Evidence-based understanding of management perils for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):20-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  62. A multinational assessment of metal-on-metal bearings in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21; 93 Suppl 3:43-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  63. In vivo wear of a squeaky alumina-on-alumina hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 06; 93(7):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  64. In vivo severe corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement of retrieved modular body titanium alloy hip-implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Jan; 88(1):206-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  65. Ion production and excretion in a patient with a metal-on-metal bearing hip prosthesis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec; 89(12):2758-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  66. A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6):918-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  67. The acetabular insert-metal backing interface: an additional source of polyethylene wear debris. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7):914-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  68. The relationship between activity and ions in patients with metal-on-metal bearing hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr; 87(4):781-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  69. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  70. Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: lessons learned from retrieval studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):10-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  71. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Aug; (401):149-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  72. Implant design affects markers of bone resorption and formation in total hip replacement. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 May; 17(5):800-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  73. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging of wear and corrosion products within joint capsule tissue from total hip replacements patients. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020 02; 108(2):513-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  74. Cobalt-alloy implant debris induce HIF-1a hypoxia associated responses: a mechanism for metal-specific orthopedic implant failure. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e67127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  75. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  76. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):239-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.