Header Logo

Connection

Shane Nho to Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Patient Reported Outcome Measures.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
9.935
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):838-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.632
  2. Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  3. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.531
  4. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.516
  5. Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.492
  6. The Importance of Comprehensive Cam Correction: Radiographic Parameters Are Predictive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2018 07; 46(9):2072-2078.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.477
  7. Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  8. Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2023 07; 51(8):2141-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  9. Patients Maintain Clinically Significant Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1869-1881.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  10. Capsular Repair Is Associated With Lower Revision Rates Yet Similar Clinical Outcomes and Arthroplasty Conversion 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1882-1891.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  11. Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  12. Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2023 11; 39(11):2293-2299.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  13. Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Index Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predict Contralateral Surgery Results at 2 Years. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1175-1182.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  14. Borderline Dysplastic Hips Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Achieve Equivalent Patient Reported Outcomes When Compared With Hips With Normal Acetabular Coverage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 15; 31(6):e336-e346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  15. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  16. Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Hips With Mild Osteoarthritis (T?nnis Grade 1): A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2598-2605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  17. Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2606-2612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  18. Presence of a Posterior Wall Sign in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2022 08; 37(8):1520-1525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  19. Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar; 50(3):746-756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  20. The Natural Course of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement According to the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and Hip Outcome Score Sports Subscale. Am J Sports Med. 2021 10; 49(12):3250-3260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  21. Multicenter Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of 2-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair Versus Labral Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021 09; 49(11):2968-2976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  22. High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  23. Association Between Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion and Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2466-2474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  24. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  25. Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  26. Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  27. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  28. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  29. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  30. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  31. Large Heterogeneity Among Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reporting Trends and Quantification Methods. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):1028-1037.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  32. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  33. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  34. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  35. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  36. Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1033-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  37. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  38. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  39. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  40. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  41. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  42. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  43. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  44. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  45. Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Have Asymmetrical Hip Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Compensatory Muscle Changes Associated With Preoperative Pain?Level. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1445-1453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  46. Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  47. Assessment of Association Between Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Outcomes Following Gluteus Medius Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1092-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  48. Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum 2 Years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):552-559.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  49. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  50. Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  51. High Rate of Return to Swimming After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1471-1477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  52. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  53. Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2023 11; 51(13):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  54. Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  55. Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  56. Prospective, Observational Study of Opioid Use After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1488-1497.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  57. Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.