Header Logo

Connection

Shane Nho to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Humans.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
1.972
Humans
  1. Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Hips With Mild Osteoarthritis (T?nnis Grade 1): A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2598-2605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  2. Presence of a Posterior Wall Sign in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2022 08; 37(8):1520-1525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  3. Editorial Commentary: Hip Joint Venting Prior to Initiating Traction Reduces Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2171-2172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  4. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Five-Year Results in 140 Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):90-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  5. Regarding "Routine Interportal Capsular Repair Does Not Lead to Superior Clinical Outcome Following Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Correction With Labral Repair". Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1788-1789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  6. A Cadaveric Study of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: Biomechanical Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Cam Morphology, Partial Femoral Osteoplasty, and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2425-2432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  7. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  8. 1.5?T magnetic resonance imaging generates accurate 3D proximal femoral models: Surgical planning implications for femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2020 09; 38(9):2050-2056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  9. Comparing Outcomes of Competitive Athletes Versus Nonathletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):159-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  10. Radiographic Prevalence of Symphysis Pubis Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 05; 47(6):1467-1472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  11. Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum 2 Years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):552-559.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  12. Systematic Review of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Importance of Labral Repair and Capsular Closure. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):646-656.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  13. Intra-articular Volume Reduction With Arthroscopic Plication for Capsular Laxity of the Hip: A Cadaveric Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):471-477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  14. The Influence of Pain in Other Major Joints and the Spine on 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3196-3201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  15. The Importance of Comprehensive Cam Correction: Radiographic Parameters Are Predictive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2018 07; 46(9):2072-2078.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  16. High Rate of Return to Swimming After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1471-1477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  17. Amateur and Recreational Athletes Return to Sport at a High Rate Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):748-755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  18. Does the Hip Capsule Remain Closed After Hip Arthroscopy With Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Symptomatic Postoperative Patients. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan; 33(1):108-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  19. Capsulotomy Size Affects Hip Joint Kinematic Stability. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1571-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  20. Impact of Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology on Gait Assessment in Symptomatic Patients. Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct; 7(5):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  21. Evaluation of Sexual Function Before and After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1850-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  22. The False-Profile View May Be Used to Identify Cam Morphology. Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep; 31(9):1728-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  23. Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  24. Quantification and correlation of hip capsular volume to demographic and radiographic predictors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun; 24(6):2009-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  25. Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  26. The burden of hip osteoarthritis in the United States: epidemiologic and economic considerations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21 Suppl 1:S1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  27. Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):358-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  28. Hip osseous morphology using computer navigation and plain radiographs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Nov; 41(11):519-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  29. New radiographic parameters to describe anterior acetabular rim trimming during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1404-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  30. Outcomes after the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in a mixed group of high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl:14S-9S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  31. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct; 37(10):1938-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  32. Anatomic reduction and next-generation fixation constructs for arthroscopic repair of crescent, L-shaped, and U-shaped rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2009 May; 25(5):553-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  33. The Role of Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: History, Current Practices, and Future Applications. JBJS Rev. 2021 08 20; 9(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  34. Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  35. Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  36. What Makes Suture Anchor Use Safe in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review of Techniques and Safety Profile. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1280-1293.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  37. Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  38. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan; 38(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  39. Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep; 467(9):2241-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  40. Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov; 90 Suppl 4:2-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  41. Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep; 19(7):794-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  42. Lavage solution temperature influences depth of chondrocyte death and surface contouring during thermal chondroplasty with temperature-controlled monopolar radiofrequency energy. Am J Sports Med. 2002 Sep-Oct; 30(5):667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.