Shane Nho to Arthroscopy
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Arthroscopy.
Connection Strength
41.504
-
Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
Score: 0.527
-
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):2090-2105.
Score: 0.481
-
Author Reply to "Regarding 'Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique'". Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3225-3226.
Score: 0.476
-
Multicenter Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of 2-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair Versus Labral Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021 09; 49(11):2968-2976.
Score: 0.468
-
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
Score: 0.463
-
Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
Score: 0.462
-
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Prolonged Opioid Use in Opioid-Na?ve Primary Hip Arthroscopy Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 05 25; 5(5):e21.00093-8.
Score: 0.461
-
Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
Score: 0.459
-
Surgical Treatment of Labral Tears: Debridement, Repair, and Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):e1-e8.
Score: 0.454
-
Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
Score: 0.452
-
Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
Score: 0.450
-
Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
Score: 0.448
-
Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1143-1151.
Score: 0.448
-
The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Five-Year Results in 140 Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):90-96.
Score: 0.446
-
Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
Score: 0.445
-
The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 08; 48(10):NP45-NP46.
Score: 0.436
-
Approach to the Patient With Failed Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 01; 28(13):538-545.
Score: 0.434
-
Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
Score: 0.431
-
A Cadaveric Study of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: Biomechanical Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Cam Morphology, Partial Femoral Osteoplasty, and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2425-2432.
Score: 0.431
-
Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
Score: 0.430
-
Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
Score: 0.429
-
Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):901-907.
Score: 0.424
-
The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
Score: 0.422
-
Case (and capsule) closed! Can we really claim that capsular repair may not influence outcomes after hip arthroscopy? Hip Int. 2020 05; 30(3):363-364.
Score: 0.422
-
Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
Score: 0.419
-
The Role of Comprehensive Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):9-11.
Score: 0.419
-
Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
Score: 0.419
-
The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
Score: 0.418
-
Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
Score: 0.418
-
Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3240-3247.
Score: 0.416
-
Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
Score: 0.416
-
Comparing Outcomes of Competitive Athletes Versus Nonathletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):159-166.
Score: 0.416
-
Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
Score: 0.415
-
How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
Score: 0.412
-
Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
Score: 0.408
-
Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
Score: 0.408
-
Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
Score: 0.407
-
Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
Score: 0.406
-
Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
Score: 0.402
-
Radiographic Prevalence of Symphysis Pubis Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 05; 47(6):1467-1472.
Score: 0.399
-
Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
Score: 0.398
-
Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
Score: 0.398
-
Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Have Asymmetrical Hip Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Compensatory Muscle Changes Associated With Preoperative Pain?Level. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1445-1453.
Score: 0.397
-
Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
Score: 0.396
-
Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum 2 Years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):552-559.
Score: 0.395
-
Systematic Review of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Importance of Labral Repair and Capsular Closure. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):646-656.e3.
Score: 0.393
-
Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Sleep Quality Postoperatively. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):461-469.
Score: 0.391
-
Intra-articular Volume Reduction With Arthroscopic Plication for Capsular Laxity of the Hip: A Cadaveric Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):471-477.
Score: 0.391
-
Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
Score: 0.388
-
The Influence of Pain in Other Major Joints and the Spine on 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3196-3201.
Score: 0.386
-
Vertical Extension of the T-Capsulotomy Incision in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Does Not Affect the Force Required for Hip Distraction: Effect of Capsulotomy Size, Type, and Subsequent Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2018 11; 46(13):3127-3133.
Score: 0.385
-
Return to Golf After Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3187-3193.e1.
Score: 0.384
-
Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
Score: 0.384
-
Editorial Commentary: Smarter Than a Sixth Grader? Hip Arthroscopists, Check Your Training at the Door. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2150-2151.
Score: 0.377
-
The Importance of Comprehensive Cam Correction: Radiographic Parameters Are Predictive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2018 07; 46(9):2072-2078.
Score: 0.377
-
High Rate of Return to Swimming After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1471-1477.
Score: 0.373
-
Editorial Commentary: What Irks a Hip Arthroscopist? Intraoperative Anchor Failure. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1217-1218.
Score: 0.371
-
Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
Score: 0.362
-
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov; 45(13):3044-3051.
Score: 0.355
-
Hip Arthroscopy for Atypical Posterior Hip Pain: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun; 45(7):1627-1632.
Score: 0.345
-
Current Techniques in Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: Capsular Repair and Plication. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):49-54.
Score: 0.340
-
Amateur and Recreational Athletes Return to Sport at a High Rate Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):748-755.
Score: 0.340
-
Does the Hip Capsule Remain Closed After Hip Arthroscopy With Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Symptomatic Postoperative Patients. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan; 33(1):108-115.
Score: 0.335
-
High Rate of Return to Running for Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 45(1):127-134.
Score: 0.334
-
Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Arthroscopy. 2016 09; 32(9):1877-86.
Score: 0.328
-
Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
Score: 0.326
-
Hip Arthroscopy Surgical Volume Trends and 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1286-92.
Score: 0.324
-
Imaging in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comprehensive Approach. Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul; 35(3):331-344.
Score: 0.324
-
Complications in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Strategies for Prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec; 23(4):187-93.
Score: 0.316
-
The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1844-9.
Score: 0.306
-
Evaluation of Sexual Function Before and After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1850-6.
Score: 0.304
-
Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
Score: 0.302
-
Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
Score: 0.299
-
Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
Score: 0.290
-
Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
Score: 0.272
-
Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
Score: 0.269
-
Evidence of capsular defect following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr; 22(4):902-5.
Score: 0.268
-
Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
Score: 0.261
-
Hip pain in active patients: what you may be missing. J Fam Pract. 2012 Dec; 61(12):736-44.
Score: 0.256
-
Outcomes after the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in a mixed group of high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl:14S-9S.
Score: 0.232
-
Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears combined with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec; 26(12):1667-74.
Score: 0.219
-
Biomechanical and biologic augmentation for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar; 38(3):619-29.
Score: 0.206
-
Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov; 25(11):1319-28.
Score: 0.204
-
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct; 37(10):1938-45.
Score: 0.202
-
Anatomic reduction and next-generation fixation constructs for arthroscopic repair of crescent, L-shaped, and U-shaped rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2009 May; 25(5):553-9.
Score: 0.200
-
Arthroscopic repair of L-shaped tear of the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex in a pediatric patient: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Dec; 17(12):1454-7.
Score: 0.197
-
Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jul; 25(7):788-93.
Score: 0.197
-
Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan; 23(1):94-102, 102.e1.
Score: 0.170
-
The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
Score: 0.151
-
Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
Score: 0.133
-
Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2023 07; 51(8):2141-2150.
Score: 0.133
-
Patients Maintain Clinically Significant Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1869-1881.e1.
Score: 0.132
-
Capsular Repair Is Associated With Lower Revision Rates Yet Similar Clinical Outcomes and Arthroplasty Conversion 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1882-1891.e1.
Score: 0.132
-
Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2023 11; 39(11):2293-2299.e1.
Score: 0.132
-
Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Index Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predict Contralateral Surgery Results at 2 Years. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1175-1182.e1.
Score: 0.128
-
Borderline Dysplastic Hips Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Achieve Equivalent Patient Reported Outcomes When Compared With Hips With Normal Acetabular Coverage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 15; 31(6):e336-e346.
Score: 0.127
-
Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
Score: 0.126
-
Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
Score: 0.125
-
Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Hips With Mild Osteoarthritis (T?nnis Grade 1): A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2598-2605.
Score: 0.125
-
Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2606-2612.
Score: 0.125
-
Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(8):2155-2164.
Score: 0.124
-
Presence of a Posterior Wall Sign in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2022 08; 37(8):1520-1525.
Score: 0.123
-
Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar; 50(3):746-756.
Score: 0.121
-
Return to Sport in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2022 01; 50(1):30-39.
Score: 0.119
-
Patients With a High Femoroepiphyseal Roof With Concomitant Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Do Not Demonstrate Inferior Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2022 05; 38(5):1509-1515.
Score: 0.119
-
The Natural Course of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement According to the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and Hip Outcome Score Sports Subscale. Am J Sports Med. 2021 10; 49(12):3250-3260.
Score: 0.118
-
The safe zones for endoscopic proximal hamstring repair: a cadaveric assessment of standard portal placement and their relationship to major neurovascular structures. Hip Int. 2023 May; 33(3):533-538.
Score: 0.117
-
MRI-- and CT--based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2022 05; 40(5):1174-1181.
Score: 0.116
-
Editorial Commentary: Hip Joint Venting Prior to Initiating Traction Reduces Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2171-2172.
Score: 0.116
-
High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
Score: 0.116
-
Association Between Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion and Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2466-2474.
Score: 0.116
-
Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
Score: 0.116
-
Use of Younger Patient Age and Greater Anterior Center-Edge Angle to Predict the Need for Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement-Related Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(8):2110-2116.
Score: 0.116
-
Intraoperative Computer Vision Integrated Interactive Fluoroscopy Correlates With Successful Femoroplasty on Clinic-Based Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3371-3382.
Score: 0.115
-
Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
Score: 0.114
-
Capsular Management Techniques and Hip Arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):22-27.
Score: 0.114
-
Tenotomy for Iliopsoas Pathology is Infrequently Performed and Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Hips Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2140-2148.
Score: 0.113
-
Hip Instability in the Athlete: Anatomy, Etiology, and Management. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):289-300.
Score: 0.113
-
Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):713-720.
Score: 0.113
-
High Rate of Full Duty Return to Work After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Workers Who Are Not on Workers' Compensation. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):729-736.
Score: 0.113
-
Large Heterogeneity Among Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reporting Trends and Quantification Methods. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):1028-1037.e6.
Score: 0.111
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
Score: 0.109
-
Regarding "Routine Interportal Capsular Repair Does Not Lead to Superior Clinical Outcome Following Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Correction With Labral Repair". Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1788-1789.
Score: 0.108
-
Editorial Commentary: Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: What We Know Now and Where Do We Go From Here? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1862-1863.
Score: 0.108
-
Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
Score: 0.106
-
Adjunct Analgesia Reduces Pain and Opioid Consumption After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3638-3651.
Score: 0.106
-
Regarding "Fascia Iliaca Blockade With the Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Perioperative Pain Management During Hip Arthroscopy: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial". Arthroscopy. 2020 02; 36(2):329-330.
Score: 0.105
-
Best Practice Guidelines for Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results of a Delphi Process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15; 28(2):81-89.
Score: 0.105
-
Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1033-1038.
Score: 0.105
-
Editorial Commentary: Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroscopy-Bear in Mind the Bearing of Weight. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):165-166.
Score: 0.105
-
Timing of Surgery: Can It Predict Outcome? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):NP11-NP12.
Score: 0.105
-
Unplanned Admissions Following Hip Arthroscopy: Incidence and Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3271-3277.
Score: 0.104
-
Radiographic Prevalence of Sacroiliac Joint Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2598-2605.e1.
Score: 0.102
-
Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
Score: 0.102
-
Indications and Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2175-2186.
Score: 0.101
-
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2064-2069.
Score: 0.101
-
Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
Score: 0.101
-
Editorial Commentary: If You Can't See It, You Can't Treat It: Proper Hip Radiographic Views Are Critical. Arthroscopy. 2019 06; 35(6):1807-1808.
Score: 0.101
-
What Makes Suture Anchor Use Safe in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review of Techniques and Safety Profile. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1280-1293.e1.
Score: 0.099
-
Predictors of 5-Year Citation Rate in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Literature. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):206-211.
Score: 0.097
-
The dimensions of the hip capsule can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging and may have a role in arthroscopic planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr; 28(4):1246-1261.
Score: 0.096
-
Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy: Direct Comparison of Primary Acetabular Labral Repair and Primary Acetabular Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1748-1751.
Score: 0.094
-
Effects of Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1205-1213.
Score: 0.092
-
There Is a Significant Discrepancy Between "Big Data" Database and Original Research Publications on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1998-2004.
Score: 0.092
-
Prospective, Observational Study of Opioid Use After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1488-1497.e6.
Score: 0.092
-
The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix at the Time of Gluteus Medius Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):832-841.
Score: 0.091
-
Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
Score: 0.091
-
Hip Dysplasia: Prevalence, Associated Findings, and Procedures From Large Multicenter Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 02; 34(2):444-453.
Score: 0.090
-
Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1998-2005.
Score: 0.090
-
The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Capsular Plication for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug; 45(10):2303-2311.
Score: 0.087
-
A Critical Review: Management and Surgical Options for Articular Defects in the Hip. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 36(3):573-586.
Score: 0.087
-
Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
Score: 0.087
-
Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):35-41.
Score: 0.085
-
Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct; 44(10):2505-2517.
Score: 0.083
-
Hip Dislocation or Subluxation After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1428-34.
Score: 0.081
-
Vibratory sense deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016 03; 16(1):40-4.
Score: 0.080
-
Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
Score: 0.080
-
Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
Score: 0.077
-
The False-Profile View May Be Used to Identify Cam Morphology. Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep; 31(9):1728-32.
Score: 0.076
-
Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):98-104.
Score: 0.073
-
Identification and treatment of existing copathology in anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan; 31(1):154-66.
Score: 0.072
-
Operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep; 42(3):112-9.
Score: 0.072
-
The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
Score: 0.072
-
Evaluation of hip pain in young adults. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 May; 42(2):38-47.
Score: 0.071
-
A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for complete gluteus medius tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1410-6.
Score: 0.062
-
New radiographic parameters to describe anterior acetabular rim trimming during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1404-9.
Score: 0.062
-
Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Nov; 18(11):645-56.
Score: 0.055
-
A biomechanical analysis of shoulder stabilization: posteroinferior glenohumeral capsular plication. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1413-9.
Score: 0.054
-
Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
Score: 0.054
-
Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid. Arthroscopy. 2010 Apr; 26(4):555-62.
Score: 0.053
-
Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar; 26(3):393-403.
Score: 0.053
-
Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan; 38(1):40-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug; 25(8):909-20.
Score: 0.051
-
Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch through the subacromial space. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr; 25(4):439-45.
Score: 0.050
-
Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov; 90 Suppl 4:2-19.
Score: 0.048
-
Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation of patellar resurfacing with press-fit osteochondral autograft plugs. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1101-9.
Score: 0.046
-
Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2023 11; 51(13):3439-3446.
Score: 0.034
-
Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep; 19(7):794-8.
Score: 0.034
-
External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2022 11; 50(13):3593-3599.
Score: 0.032
-
Criteria for the Operating Room Confirmation of the Diagnosis of Hip Instability: The Results of an International Expert Consensus Conference. Arthroscopy. 2022 10; 38(10):2837-2849.e2.
Score: 0.031
-
Risk of intra-articular hip injury in adolescent athletes: a five-year multicentre cohort study. Int Orthop. 2020 10; 44(10):1965-1969.
Score: 0.027
-
The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
Score: 0.025
-
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
Score: 0.024