Header Logo

Connection

Richard Trohman to Pacemaker, Artificial

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Trohman has written about Pacemaker, Artificial.
Connection Strength

5.762
  1. Three-dimensional echocardiography definitively delineates a malpositioned permanent pacing lead in a patient with chronic chest pain. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep; 44(9):1646-1650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.732
  2. Sensors for rate-adaptive pacing: How they work, strengths, and limitations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 11; 31(11):3009-3027.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.698
  3. Removal of Retained Pacing Leads With Vena Caval Inflow Occlusion When Cardiopulmonary Bypass Is Contraindicated. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec; 100(6):2379-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.498
  4. To the editor-comment on six uneventful years with a pacing lead in the left ventricle. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Nov; 10(11):e81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.426
  5. Temporary left ventricular resynchronization therapy in cardiogenic shock: a new pacing paradigm to fight an old foe? Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jan; 10(1):53-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  6. "Proud flesh" post permanent pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Dec; 8(12):1988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.347
  7. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a potential option for congenitally corrected transposition of the great vessels. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Dec; 24(12):2293-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  8. What is the minimal pacing rate that prevents torsades de pointes? Insights from patients with permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Nov; 25(11):1612-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  9. Interference in implanted cardiac devices, part II. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Oct; 25(10):1496-509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  10. Interference in implanted cardiac devices, Part I. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Sep; 25(9):1367-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  11. Comparison of electrocautery platforms for pulse generator replacement procedures. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 09; 64(3):557-558.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  12. Lethal ventricular arrhythmias following one-step pacemaker reprogramming for rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Feb 01; 87(3):349-50, A9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  13. Pros and Cons of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 12; 13(12):e008874.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  14. Development of New-Onset or Progressive Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Permanent HIS Bundle Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing: Results From the RUSH HBP Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 11 17; 9(22):e018478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  15. Permanent pacing via implantable defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 1):1667-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  16. Concealed accessory pathway manifesting clinically only after pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Oct; 23(10 Pt 1):1567-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  17. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Circulation. 1993 Sep; 88(3):1045-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  18. Successful percutaneous extraction of a chronic left ventricular pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Oct; 14(10):1448-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  19. Re: EP challenges in adult congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Feb; 6(2):e1; author reply e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  20. Endoscopy in patients with implanted electronic devices. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Apr; 65(4):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  21. Value of pacemaker atrial diagnostic data in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an opportunity to improve rates of warfarin utilization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Apr; 30(4):580-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  22. Cardiac pacing: the state of the art. Lancet. 2004 Nov 6-12; 364(9446):1701-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  23. Which is the optimal testing method for identifying an AV delay that allows intrinsic conduction? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1758-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  24. Incidence and electrocardiographic localization of safe right bundle branch block configurations during permanent ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Oct 15; 76(11):781-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  25. Durability of bipolar coaxial endocardial pacemaker leads compared with unipolar leads. Cleve Clin J Med. 1994 Jan-Feb; 61(1):25-8; quiz 80-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  26. Long-term performance of epimyocardial pacing leads in adults: comparison with endocardial leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Mar; 16(3 Pt 1):412-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  27. Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy and a bilateral cardiac approach. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Dec 01; 70(18):1438-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  28. Incidence and predictors of loss of pacing in the atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2050-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  29. Incidence and predictors of syncope in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2055-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  30. DDIR versus VVIR pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 1):1630-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  31. Early clinical experience with a minute ventilation sensor DDDR pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1815-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  32. Interference with an implantable defibrillator by an electronic antitheft-surveillance device. N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 05; 339(19):1371-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  33. Is hospital admission for initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy with sotalol for atrial arrhythmias required? Yield of in-hospital monitoring and prediction of risk for significant arrhythmia complications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jul; 32(1):169-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.