Header Logo

Connection

Valeriy Shafiro to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Valeriy Shafiro has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.813
  1. Recognition of Interrupted Speech, Text, and Text-Supplemented Speech by Older Adults: Effect of Interruption Rate. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 11 17; 65(11):4404-4416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  2. Introduction for the 5th International Meeting on Internet and Audiology Special Issue of the American Journal of Audiology. Am J Audiol. 2022 Sep 21; 31(3S):845-848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  3. Online Assessment of Speech Perception and Auditory Spectrotemporal Processing in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Am J Audiol. 2022 Sep 21; 31(3S):936-949.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  4. A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 03 17; 64(3):1040-1052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  5. Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners. Am J Audiol. 2020 Sep 18; 29(3S):577-590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  6. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 10 26; 61(10):2578-2588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  7. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things? Laryngoscope. 2018 04; 128(4):959-966.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  8. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0167030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  9. The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan; 139(1):455-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  10. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  11. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  12. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  13. Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults. Hear Res. 2014 Apr; 310:76-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. Auditory and cognitive effects of aging on perception of environmental sounds in natural auditory scenes. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Oct; 56(5):1373-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  15. Perceptual confusions of American-English vowels and consonants by native Arabic bilinguals. Lang Speech. 2013 Jun; 56(Pt 2):145-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  16. The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun; 16(2):83-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  17. Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct; 130(4):2076-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  18. Perception of interrupted speech: cross-rate variation in the intelligibility of gated and concatenated sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL108-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  19. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug; 32(4):511-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  20. The incongruency advantage for environmental sounds presented in natural auditory scenes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr; 37(2):551-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  21. The role of native-language phonology in the auditory word identification and visual word recognition of Russian-English bilinguals. J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Mar; 38(2):93-110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  22. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli. Ear Hear. 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  23. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution. Ear Hear. 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  24. Perceiving the speech of multiple concurrent talkers in a combined divided and selective attention task. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec; 122(6):EL229-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  25. Variable perception of white noise in ambiguous phonetic contexts: the case of /p/ and /f/. J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Nov; 36(6):457-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  26. How to select stimuli for environmental sound research and where to find them. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov; 36(4):590-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Identification Accuracy of Safety-Relevant Environmental Sounds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Laryngoscope. 2023 09; 133(9):2388-2393.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  28. Safety-relevant environmental sound identification in cochlear implant candidates and users. Laryngoscope. 2020 06; 130(6):1547-1551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  29. Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates. Otol Neurotol. 2018 12; 39(10):e964-e971.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  30. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech? Laryngoscope. 2018 11; 128 Suppl 5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  31. The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users. Otol Neurotol. 2017 10; 38(9):e308-e314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  32. Relationship between Auditory and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adults. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0134330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  33. Predicting the timing of dynamic events through sound: Bouncing balls. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul; 138(1):457-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  34. Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI). J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Nov-Dec; 24(10):969-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  35. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception. Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec; 33(6):709-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  36. Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug; 122(2):1111-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.