Header Logo

Connection

Theodore Pincus to Surveys and Questionnaires

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Theodore Pincus has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
Connection Strength

14.334
  1. Patient questionnaires in osteoarthritis: what patients teach doctors about their osteoarthritis on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) in clinical trials and clinical care. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct; 37 Suppl 120(5):100-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  2. Electronic multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (eMDHAQ): past, present and future of a proposed single data management system for clinical care, research, quality improvement, and monitoring of long-term outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):S17-S33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  3. Electronic eRAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data): opportunities and complexities. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):S49-S53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  4. Pragmatic assessment of exercise in routine care using an MDHAQ: associations with changes in RAPID3 and other clinical variables. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 09 06; 18:199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.374
  5. Are patient self-report questionnaires as "scientific" as biomarkers in "treat-to-target" and prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis? Curr Pharm Des. 2015; 21(2):241-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.332
  6. Discordance of global estimates by patients and their physicians in usual care of many rheumatic diseases: association with 5 scores on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) that are not found on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jun; 66(6):934-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  7. Is a patient questionnaire without a joint examination as undesirable as a joint examination without a patient questionnaire? J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr; 41(4):619-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.316
  8. MDHAQ/RAPID3 to recognize improvement over 2 months in usual care of patients with osteoarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthropathy, and gout, as well as rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Jun; 19(4):169-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.298
  9. RAPID3, an index of only 3 patient self-report core data set measures, but not ESR, recognizes incomplete responses to methotrexate in usual care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013; 71(2):117-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  10. An evidence-based medical visit for patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on standard, quantitative scientific data from a patient MDHAQ and physician report. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70(2):73-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  11. MDHAQ/RAPID3 can provide a roadmap or agenda for all rheumatology visits when the entire MDHAQ is completed at all patient visits and reviewed by the doctor before the encounter. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70(3):177-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  12. Pragmatic and scientific advantages of MDHAQ/ RAPID3 completion by all patients at all visits in routine clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70 Suppl 1:30-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  13. Quantitative data for care of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in usual clinical settings: a patient Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and physician estimate of noninflammatory symptoms. J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul; 38(7):1309-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.256
  14. MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores: quantitative patient history data in a standardized "scientific" format for optimal assessment of patient status and quality of care in rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011; 69(3):201-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  15. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data) on an MDHAQ (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire): agreement with DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) activity categories, scored in five versus more than ninety seconds. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Feb; 62(2):181-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  16. Are patient questionnaire scores as "scientific" as laboratory tests for rheumatology clinical care? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(2):130-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  17. Beyond RAPID3 - practical use of the MDHAQ to improve doctor-patient communication. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(3):223-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  18. A biopsychosocial model to complement a biomedical model: patient questionnaire data and socioeconomic status usually are more significant than laboratory tests and imaging studies in prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):699-712, v.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  19. Joint counts to assess rheumatoid arthritis for clinical research and usual clinical care: advantages and limitations. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):713-22, v-vi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  20. Patient questionnaires in rheumatoid arthritis: advantages and limitations as a quantitative, standardized scientific medical history. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):735-43, vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  21. Complex measures and indices for clinical research compared with simple patient questionnaires to assess function, pain, and global estimates as rheumatology "vital signs" for usual clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):779-86, ix.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  22. The HAQ compared with the MDHAQ: "keep it simple, stupid" (KISS), with feasibility and clinical value as primary criteria for patient questionnaires in usual clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):787-98, ix.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  23. How to collect an MDHAQ to provide rheumatology vital signs (function, pain, global status, and RAPID3 scores) in the infrastructure of rheumatology care, including some misconceptions regarding the MDHAQ. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):799-812, x.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  24. A multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3) scores are informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):819-27, x.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  25. A Standard Protocol to Evaluate Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPERA) for efficient capture of essential data from a patient and a health professional in a uniform "scientific" format. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):843-50, xi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  26. Quality control of a medical history: improving accuracy with patient participation, supported by a four-page version of the multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):851-60, xi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  27. Criterion contamination of depression scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the need for interpretation of patient questionnaires (as all clinical measures) in the context of all information about the patient. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):861-4, xi-xii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  28. Clues on the MDHAQ to identify patients with fibromyalgia and similar chronic pain conditions. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):865-9, xii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  29. Is a self-report RAPID3 score a reasonable alternative to a DAS28 in usual clinical care? J Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Aug; 15(5):215-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  30. Quantitative clinical rheumatology: why is a test for anti-CCP antibodies included in most routine care for rheumatoid arthritis while a HAQ/MDHAQ remains largely a research tool? J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug; 36(8):1563-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  31. RAPID3-an index of physical function, pain, and global status as "vital signs" to improve care for people with chronic rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(2):211-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  32. Can RAPID3, an index without formal joint counts or laboratory tests, serve to guide rheumatologists in tight control of rheumatoid arthritis in usual clinical care? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(3):254-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  33. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3), a rheumatoid arthritis index without formal joint counts for routine care: proposed severity categories compared to disease activity score and clinical disease activity index categories. J Rheumatol. 2008 Nov; 35(11):2136-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  34. Quantitative clinical assessment in busy rheumatology settings: the value of short patient questionnaires. J Rheumatol. 2008 Jul; 35(7):1235-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  35. Visual analog scales in formats other than a 10 centimeter horizontal line to assess pain and other clinical data. J Rheumatol. 2008 Aug; 35(8):1550-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  36. Time to score quantitative rheumatoid arthritis measures: 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores. J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr; 35(4):603-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  37. Pain, function, and RAPID scores: vital signs in chronic diseases, analogous to pulse and temperature in acute diseases and blood pressure and cholesterol in long-term health. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66(2):155-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  38. Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):601-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  39. Can a Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores be informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):733-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  40. A practical guide to scoring a Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores in 10-20 seconds for use in standard clinical care, without rulers, calculators, websites or computers. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):755-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  41. A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) for all patients with rheumatic diseases to complete at all visits in standard clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007; 65(2):150-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  42. Patient questionnaires and formal education as more significant prognostic markers than radiographs or laboratory tests for rheumatoid arthritis mortality--limitations of a biomedical model to predict long-term outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007; 65 Suppl 1:S29-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  43. Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability scores over five years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct; 54(10):3113-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  44. The DAS is the most specific measure, but a patient questionnaire is the most informative measure to assess rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006 May; 33(5):834-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  45. Saving time and improving care with a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire: 10 practical considerations. J Rheumatol. 2006 Mar; 33(3):448-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  46. Advantages and limitations of quantitative measures to assess rheumatoid arthritis: joint counts, radiographs, laboratory tests, and patient questionnaires. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2006; 64(1-2):32-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  47. Further development of a physical function scale on a MDHAQ [corrected] for standard care of patients with rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol. 2005 Aug; 32(8):1432-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  48. Patient questionnaires for clinical research and improved standard patient care: is it better to have 80% of the information in 100% of patients or 100% of the information in 5% of patients? J Rheumatol. 2005 Apr; 32(4):575-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  49. Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct; 50(10):3296-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  50. Patient questionnaires and formal education level as prospective predictors of mortality over 10 years in 97% of 1416 patients with rheumatoid arthritis from 15 United States private practices. J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb; 31(2):229-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  51. HAQ and DAS28 for clinical trials over months and MDHAQ, RheuMetric and psycho-socio-economic measures for long-term observations over years? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 10 06; 61(10):3884-3886.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  52. Further Simplified Clinimetry Using a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2023 03; 50(3):460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  53. Low socioeconomic status and patient questionnaires in osteoarthritis: challenges to a "biomedical model" and value of a complementary "biopsychosocial model". Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct; 37 Suppl 120(5):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  54. Osteoarthritis is as severe as rheumatoid arthritis: evidence over 40 years according to the same measure in each disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct; 37 Suppl 120(5):7-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  55. Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool: Clues to Fibromyalgia on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire for Routine Care. J Rheumatol. 2020 05 01; 47(5):761-769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  56. Disease Burden in Osteoarthritis Is Similar to That of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Initial Rheumatology Visit and Significantly Greater Six Months Later. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 08; 71(8):1276-1284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  57. Assessment of pain and other patient symptoms in routine clinical care as quantitative, standardised, "scientific" data. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct; 35 Suppl 107(5):13-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  58. Assessment of fatigue in routine care on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): a cross-sectional study of associations with RAPID3 and other variables in different rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5):901-909.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  59. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Scores Yield Similar Information in 85 Korean Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Seen in Usual Clinical Care. J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Sep; 21(6):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  60. RheuMetric A Physician Checklist to Record Patient Levels of Inflammation, Damage and Distress as Quantitative Data Rather than as Narrative Impressions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jul; 73(3):178-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  61. The past versus the present, 1980-2004: reduction of mean initial low-dose, long-term glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis from 10.3 to 3.6 mg/day, concomitant with early methotrexate, with long-term effectiveness and safety of less than 5 mg/day. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2015; 22(1-2):89-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  62. RHEUMDOC: a one-page RHEUMatology DOCtor form with four physician global estimates for overall status, inflammation, damage, and symptoms based on neither inflammation nor damage. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014; 72(2):142-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  63. Can remission in rheumatoid arthritis be assessed without laboratory tests or a formal joint count? possible remission criteria based on a self-report RAPID3 score and careful joint examination in the ESPOIR cohort. J Rheumatol. 2013 Apr; 40(4):386-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  64. Effective initial and long-term prednisone in doses of less than 5 mg/day to treat rheumatoid arthritis--documentation using a patient self-report Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ). Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70 Suppl 1:14-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  65. Proposed severity and response criteria for Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3): results for categories of disease activity and response criteria in abatacept clinical trials. J Rheumatol. 2011 Dec; 38(12):2565-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  66. Differences in treat-to-target in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus hypertension and diabetes--consequences for clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011; 69(2):104-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  67. Complexities in assessment of rheumatoid arthritis: absence of a single gold standard measure. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):687-97, v.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  68. RAPID3, an index to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis, without formal joint counts: similar results to DAS28 and CDAI in clinical trials and clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):773-8, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  69. Quantitative clinical rheumatology: "keep it simple, stupid": MDHAQ function, pain, global, and RAPID3 quantitative scores to improve and document the quality of rheumatologic care. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun; 36(6):1099-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  70. Limitations of a quantitative swollen and tender joint count to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66(3):216-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  71. Relative efficiencies of physician/assessor global estimates and patient questionnaire measures are similar to or greater than joint counts to distinguish adalimumab from control treatments in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol. 2008 Feb; 35(2):201-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  72. A three-page Standard Protocol to Evaluate Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPERA) for efficient capture of essential data from patients and health professionals in standard clinical care and clinical research. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):677-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  73. A proposed continuous quality improvement approach to assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis without formal joint counts, based on quantitative routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) scores on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):789-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  74. Quantitative measures to assess patients with rheumatic diseases: 2006 update. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006 Dec; 32 Suppl 1:29-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  75. An index of patient reported outcomes (PRO-Index) discriminates effectively between active and control treatment in 4 clinical trials of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov; 33(11):2146-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  76. A composite disease activity scale for clinical practice, observational studies, and clinical trials: the patient activity scale (PAS/PAS-II). J Rheumatol. 2005 Dec; 32(12):2410-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  77. Patient preference in a crossover clinical trial of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: face validity of self-report questionnaire ratings. J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar; 32(3):533-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  78. Quantitative measures for assessing rheumatoid arthritis in clinical trials and clinical care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Oct; 17(5):753-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  79. The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb 15; 49(1):59-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  80. Discordance of Global Assessments by Patient and Physician Is Higher in Female than in Male Patients Regardless of the Physician's Sex: Data on Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, and Psoriatic Arthritis from the DANBIO Registry. J Rheumatol. 2015 Oct; 42(10):1781-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  81. Assessing dyspnea and its impact on patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease. Respir Med. 2010 Sep; 104(9):1350-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  82. Work disability remains a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data from 32 countries in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010; 12(2):R42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  83. Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11(1):R7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  84. Remission and rheumatoid arthritis: data on patients receiving usual care in twenty-four countries. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep; 58(9):2642-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  85. Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008; 10(2):R30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  86. Physical inactivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from twenty-one countries in a cross-sectional, international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan 15; 59(1):42-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  87. The disease activity score is not suitable as the sole criterion for initiation and evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the clinic: discordance between assessment measures and limitations in questionnaire use for regulatory purposes. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec; 52(12):3873-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  88. Morning stiffness in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis is associated more strongly with functional disability than with joint swelling and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Rheumatol. 2004 Sep; 31(9):1723-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.