Header Logo

Connection

Theodore Pincus to Surveys and Questionnaires

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Theodore Pincus has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
Connection Strength

11.827
  1. Electronic eRAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data): opportunities and complexities. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):S49-S53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  2. Pragmatic assessment of exercise in routine care using an MDHAQ: associations with changes in RAPID3 and other clinical variables. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 09 06; 18:199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  3. Discordance of global estimates by patients and their physicians in usual care of many rheumatic diseases: association with 5 scores on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) that are not found on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jun; 66(6):934-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  4. Is a patient questionnaire without a joint examination as undesirable as a joint examination without a patient questionnaire? J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr; 41(4):619-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.318
  5. MDHAQ/RAPID3 to recognize improvement over 2 months in usual care of patients with osteoarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthropathy, and gout, as well as rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Jun; 19(4):169-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  6. RAPID3, an index of only 3 patient self-report core data set measures, but not ESR, recognizes incomplete responses to methotrexate in usual care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013; 71(2):117-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.292
  7. An evidence-based medical visit for patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on standard, quantitative scientific data from a patient MDHAQ and physician report. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70(2):73-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  8. MDHAQ/RAPID3 can provide a roadmap or agenda for all rheumatology visits when the entire MDHAQ is completed at all patient visits and reviewed by the doctor before the encounter. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70(3):177-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  9. Pragmatic and scientific advantages of MDHAQ/ RAPID3 completion by all patients at all visits in routine clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70 Suppl 1:30-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  10. Quantitative data for care of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in usual clinical settings: a patient Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and physician estimate of noninflammatory symptoms. J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul; 38(7):1309-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  11. MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores: quantitative patient history data in a standardized "scientific" format for optimal assessment of patient status and quality of care in rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011; 69(3):201-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  12. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data) on an MDHAQ (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire): agreement with DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) activity categories, scored in five versus more than ninety seconds. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Feb; 62(2):181-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  13. Are patient questionnaire scores as "scientific" as laboratory tests for rheumatology clinical care? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(2):130-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  14. Beyond RAPID3 - practical use of the MDHAQ to improve doctor-patient communication. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(3):223-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  15. A biopsychosocial model to complement a biomedical model: patient questionnaire data and socioeconomic status usually are more significant than laboratory tests and imaging studies in prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):699-712, v.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  16. Joint counts to assess rheumatoid arthritis for clinical research and usual clinical care: advantages and limitations. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):713-22, v-vi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  17. Patient questionnaires in rheumatoid arthritis: advantages and limitations as a quantitative, standardized scientific medical history. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):735-43, vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  18. The HAQ compared with the MDHAQ: "keep it simple, stupid" (KISS), with feasibility and clinical value as primary criteria for patient questionnaires in usual clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):787-98, ix.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  19. How to collect an MDHAQ to provide rheumatology vital signs (function, pain, global status, and RAPID3 scores) in the infrastructure of rheumatology care, including some misconceptions regarding the MDHAQ. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):799-812, x.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  20. A multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3) scores are informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):819-27, x.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  21. Quality control of a medical history: improving accuracy with patient participation, supported by a four-page version of the multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):851-60, xi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  22. Criterion contamination of depression scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the need for interpretation of patient questionnaires (as all clinical measures) in the context of all information about the patient. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):861-4, xi-xii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  23. Clues on the MDHAQ to identify patients with fibromyalgia and similar chronic pain conditions. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):865-9, xii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  24. Is a self-report RAPID3 score a reasonable alternative to a DAS28 in usual clinical care? J Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Aug; 15(5):215-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  25. Quantitative clinical rheumatology: why is a test for anti-CCP antibodies included in most routine care for rheumatoid arthritis while a HAQ/MDHAQ remains largely a research tool? J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug; 36(8):1563-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  26. RAPID3-an index of physical function, pain, and global status as "vital signs" to improve care for people with chronic rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(2):211-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  27. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3), a rheumatoid arthritis index without formal joint counts for routine care: proposed severity categories compared to disease activity score and clinical disease activity index categories. J Rheumatol. 2008 Nov; 35(11):2136-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  28. Visual analog scales in formats other than a 10 centimeter horizontal line to assess pain and other clinical data. J Rheumatol. 2008 Aug; 35(8):1550-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  29. Time to score quantitative rheumatoid arthritis measures: 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores. J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr; 35(4):603-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  30. Pain, function, and RAPID scores: vital signs in chronic diseases, analogous to pulse and temperature in acute diseases and blood pressure and cholesterol in long-term health. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66(2):155-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  31. Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):601-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  32. Can a Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores be informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):733-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  33. A practical guide to scoring a Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores in 10-20 seconds for use in standard clinical care, without rulers, calculators, websites or computers. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):755-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  34. A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) for all patients with rheumatic diseases to complete at all visits in standard clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007; 65(2):150-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  35. Patient questionnaires and formal education as more significant prognostic markers than radiographs or laboratory tests for rheumatoid arthritis mortality--limitations of a biomedical model to predict long-term outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007; 65 Suppl 1:S29-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  36. Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability scores over five years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct; 54(10):3113-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  37. The DAS is the most specific measure, but a patient questionnaire is the most informative measure to assess rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006 May; 33(5):834-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  38. Advantages and limitations of quantitative measures to assess rheumatoid arthritis: joint counts, radiographs, laboratory tests, and patient questionnaires. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2006; 64(1-2):32-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  39. Further development of a physical function scale on a MDHAQ [corrected] for standard care of patients with rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol. 2005 Aug; 32(8):1432-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  40. Patient questionnaires for clinical research and improved standard patient care: is it better to have 80% of the information in 100% of patients or 100% of the information in 5% of patients? J Rheumatol. 2005 Apr; 32(4):575-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  41. Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct; 50(10):3296-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  42. Patient questionnaires and formal education level as prospective predictors of mortality over 10 years in 97% of 1416 patients with rheumatoid arthritis from 15 United States private practices. J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb; 31(2):229-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  43. HAQ and DAS28 for clinical trials over months and MDHAQ, RheuMetric and psycho-socio-economic measures for long-term observations over years? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 10 06; 61(10):3884-3886.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  44. Further Simplified Clinimetry Using a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2023 03; 50(3):460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  45. Low socioeconomic status and patient questionnaires in osteoarthritis: challenges to a "biomedical model" and value of a complementary "biopsychosocial model". Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct; 37 Suppl 120(5):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  46. Osteoarthritis is as severe as rheumatoid arthritis: evidence over 40 years according to the same measure in each disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct; 37 Suppl 120(5):7-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  47. Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool: Clues to Fibromyalgia on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire for Routine Care. J Rheumatol. 2020 05 01; 47(5):761-769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  48. Disease Burden in Osteoarthritis Is Similar to That of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Initial Rheumatology Visit and Significantly Greater Six Months Later. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 08; 71(8):1276-1284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  49. Assessment of pain and other patient symptoms in routine clinical care as quantitative, standardised, "scientific" data. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct; 35 Suppl 107(5):13-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  50. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Scores Yield Similar Information in 85 Korean Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Seen in Usual Clinical Care. J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Sep; 21(6):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  51. RheuMetric A Physician Checklist to Record Patient Levels of Inflammation, Damage and Distress as Quantitative Data Rather than as Narrative Impressions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jul; 73(3):178-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  52. The past versus the present, 1980-2004: reduction of mean initial low-dose, long-term glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis from 10.3 to 3.6 mg/day, concomitant with early methotrexate, with long-term effectiveness and safety of less than 5 mg/day. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2015; 22(1-2):89-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  53. RHEUMDOC: a one-page RHEUMatology DOCtor form with four physician global estimates for overall status, inflammation, damage, and symptoms based on neither inflammation nor damage. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014; 72(2):142-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  54. Can remission in rheumatoid arthritis be assessed without laboratory tests or a formal joint count? possible remission criteria based on a self-report RAPID3 score and careful joint examination in the ESPOIR cohort. J Rheumatol. 2013 Apr; 40(4):386-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  55. Effective initial and long-term prednisone in doses of less than 5 mg/day to treat rheumatoid arthritis--documentation using a patient self-report Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ). Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70 Suppl 1:14-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  56. Differences in treat-to-target in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus hypertension and diabetes--consequences for clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011; 69(2):104-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  57. Complexities in assessment of rheumatoid arthritis: absence of a single gold standard measure. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):687-97, v.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  58. RAPID3, an index to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis, without formal joint counts: similar results to DAS28 and CDAI in clinical trials and clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):773-8, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  59. Quantitative clinical rheumatology: "keep it simple, stupid": MDHAQ function, pain, global, and RAPID3 quantitative scores to improve and document the quality of rheumatologic care. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun; 36(6):1099-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  60. Limitations of a quantitative swollen and tender joint count to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66(3):216-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  61. A proposed continuous quality improvement approach to assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis without formal joint counts, based on quantitative routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) scores on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):789-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  62. Quantitative measures to assess patients with rheumatic diseases: 2006 update. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006 Dec; 32 Suppl 1:29-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  63. An index of patient reported outcomes (PRO-Index) discriminates effectively between active and control treatment in 4 clinical trials of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov; 33(11):2146-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  64. Patient preference in a crossover clinical trial of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: face validity of self-report questionnaire ratings. J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar; 32(3):533-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  65. The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb 15; 49(1):59-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  66. Assessing dyspnea and its impact on patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease. Respir Med. 2010 Sep; 104(9):1350-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  67. Work disability remains a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data from 32 countries in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010; 12(2):R42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  68. Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11(1):R7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  69. Remission and rheumatoid arthritis: data on patients receiving usual care in twenty-four countries. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep; 58(9):2642-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  70. Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008; 10(2):R30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  71. Physical inactivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from twenty-one countries in a cross-sectional, international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan 15; 59(1):42-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  72. The disease activity score is not suitable as the sole criterion for initiation and evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the clinic: discordance between assessment measures and limitations in questionnaire use for regulatory purposes. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec; 52(12):3873-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  73. Morning stiffness in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis is associated more strongly with functional disability than with joint swelling and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Rheumatol. 2004 Sep; 31(9):1723-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.