Theodore Pincus to Rheumatic Diseases
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Theodore Pincus has written about Rheumatic Diseases.
Connection Strength
9.683
-
Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool: Clues to Fibromyalgia on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire for Routine Care. J Rheumatol. 2020 05 01; 47(5):761-769.
Score: 0.624
-
Update on imaging in rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Sep-Oct; 36 Suppl 114(5):2.
Score: 0.586
-
A RheuMetric physician checklist to quantitate levels of inflammation, damage and distress on 0-10 visual analogue scales. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct; 35 Suppl 107(5):21-25.
Score: 0.546
-
Pragmatic assessment of exercise in routine care using an MDHAQ: associations with changes in RAPID3 and other clinical variables. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 09 06; 18:199.
Score: 0.508
-
Premature Mortality: A Neglected Outcome in Rheumatic Diseases? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Aug; 67(8):1043-6.
Score: 0.470
-
RheuMetric A Physician Checklist to Record Patient Levels of Inflammation, Damage and Distress as Quantitative Data Rather than as Narrative Impressions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jul; 73(3):178-84.
Score: 0.468
-
Discordance of global estimates by patients and their physicians in usual care of many rheumatic diseases: association with 5 scores on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) that are not found on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jun; 66(6):934-42.
Score: 0.434
-
RHEUMDOC: a one-page RHEUMatology DOCtor form with four physician global estimates for overall status, inflammation, damage, and symptoms based on neither inflammation nor damage. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014; 72(2):142-7.
Score: 0.422
-
Possible discontinuation of therapies in inflammatory rheumatic diseases - as with initiation of therapies, a shared decision between patient and rheumatologist. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Jul-Aug; 31(4 Suppl 78):S1-3.
Score: 0.414
-
MDHAQ/RAPID3 can provide a roadmap or agenda for all rheumatology visits when the entire MDHAQ is completed at all patient visits and reviewed by the doctor before the encounter. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70(3):177-86.
Score: 0.367
-
MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores: quantitative patient history data in a standardized "scientific" format for optimal assessment of patient status and quality of care in rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011; 69(3):201-14.
Score: 0.342
-
Are patient questionnaire scores as "scientific" as laboratory tests for rheumatology clinical care? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(2):130-9.
Score: 0.320
-
Beyond RAPID3 - practical use of the MDHAQ to improve doctor-patient communication. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(3):223-31.
Score: 0.320
-
The HAQ compared with the MDHAQ: "keep it simple, stupid" (KISS), with feasibility and clinical value as primary criteria for patient questionnaires in usual clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):787-98, ix.
Score: 0.316
-
How to collect an MDHAQ to provide rheumatology vital signs (function, pain, global status, and RAPID3 scores) in the infrastructure of rheumatology care, including some misconceptions regarding the MDHAQ. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):799-812, x.
Score: 0.316
-
A multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3) scores are informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):819-27, x.
Score: 0.316
-
Flowsheets that include MDHAQ physical function, pain, global, and RAPID3 scores, laboratory tests, and medications to monitor patients with all rheumatic diseases: an electronic database for an electronic medical record. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):829-42, x-xi.
Score: 0.316
-
RAPID3-an index of physical function, pain, and global status as "vital signs" to improve care for people with chronic rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(2):211-25.
Score: 0.298
-
Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):601-28.
Score: 0.270
-
Can a Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores be informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug; 21(4):733-53.
Score: 0.270
-
Improving survival in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a neglected goal? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006 Dec; 8(6):401-3.
Score: 0.258
-
Quantitative measures to assess patients with rheumatic diseases: 2006 update. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006 Dec; 32 Suppl 1:29-36.
Score: 0.258
-
Further development of a physical function scale on a MDHAQ [corrected] for standard care of patients with rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol. 2005 Aug; 32(8):1432-9.
Score: 0.235
-
Patient questionnaires for clinical research and improved standard patient care: is it better to have 80% of the information in 100% of patients or 100% of the information in 5% of patients? J Rheumatol. 2005 Apr; 32(4):575-7.
Score: 0.230
-
Clinical trials in rheumatic diseases: designs and limitations. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2004 Nov; 30(4):701-24, v-vi.
Score: 0.223
-
Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct; 50(10):3296-305.
Score: 0.222
-
Information technology in rheumatology. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):1.
Score: 0.128
-
Visual analog scales in formats other than a 10 centimeter horizontal line to assess pain and other clinical data. J Rheumatol. 2008 Aug; 35(8):1550-8.
Score: 0.072
-
Pain, function, and RAPID scores: vital signs in chronic diseases, analogous to pulse and temperature in acute diseases and blood pressure and cholesterol in long-term health. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66(2):155-65.
Score: 0.070
-
A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) for all patients with rheumatic diseases to complete at all visits in standard clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007; 65(2):150-60.
Score: 0.065