Theodore Pincus to Rheumatology
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Theodore Pincus has written about Rheumatology.
Connection Strength
10.397
-
Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire as an Effective Tool to Screen for Depression in Routine Rheumatology Care. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 01; 73(1):120-129.
Score: 0.713
-
Update on imaging in rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Sep-Oct; 36 Suppl 114(5):2.
Score: 0.610
-
Electronic multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (eMDHAQ): past, present and future of a proposed single data management system for clinical care, research, quality improvement, and monitoring of long-term outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):S17-S33.
Score: 0.533
-
Electronic eRAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data): opportunities and complexities. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):S49-S53.
Score: 0.533
-
Information technology in rheumatology. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 34(5 Suppl 101):1.
Score: 0.533
-
RheuMetric A Physician Checklist to Record Patient Levels of Inflammation, Damage and Distress as Quantitative Data Rather than as Narrative Impressions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jul; 73(3):178-84.
Score: 0.487
-
Assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of patient reported outcomes--advantages of using RAPID3/MDHAQ in routine care. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014; 72(2):136-41.
Score: 0.439
-
RHEUMDOC: a one-page RHEUMatology DOCtor form with four physician global estimates for overall status, inflammation, damage, and symptoms based on neither inflammation nor damage. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014; 72(2):142-7.
Score: 0.439
-
MDHAQ/RAPID3 can provide a roadmap or agenda for all rheumatology visits when the entire MDHAQ is completed at all patient visits and reviewed by the doctor before the encounter. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70(3):177-86.
Score: 0.382
-
Are patient questionnaire scores as "scientific" as laboratory tests for rheumatology clinical care? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010; 68(2):130-9.
Score: 0.333
-
Complexities in assessment of rheumatoid arthritis: absence of a single gold standard measure. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):687-97, v.
Score: 0.329
-
Quantitative recording of physician clinical estimates, beyond a global estimate and formal joint count, in usual care: applying the scientific method, using a simple one-page worksheet. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):813-7, x.
Score: 0.329
-
Quality control of a medical history: improving accuracy with patient participation, supported by a four-page version of the multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 35(4):851-60, xi.
Score: 0.329
-
Quantitative clinical rheumatology: why is a test for anti-CCP antibodies included in most routine care for rheumatoid arthritis while a HAQ/MDHAQ remains largely a research tool? J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug; 36(8):1563-4.
Score: 0.323
-
Quantitative clinical rheumatology: "keep it simple, stupid": MDHAQ function, pain, global, and RAPID3 quantitative scores to improve and document the quality of rheumatologic care. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun; 36(6):1099-100.
Score: 0.319
-
Can RAPID3, an index without formal joint counts or laboratory tests, serve to guide rheumatologists in tight control of rheumatoid arthritis in usual clinical care? Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009; 67(3):254-66.
Score: 0.310
-
Pain, function, and RAPID scores: vital signs in chronic diseases, analogous to pulse and temperature in acute diseases and blood pressure and cholesterol in long-term health. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66(2):155-65.
Score: 0.290
-
Shouldn't standard rheumatology clinical care be evidence-based rather than eminence-based, eloquence-based, or elegance-based? J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan; 34(1):1-4.
Score: 0.270
-
A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) for all patients with rheumatic diseases to complete at all visits in standard clinical care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007; 65(2):150-60.
Score: 0.270
-
Improving survival in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a neglected goal? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006 Dec; 8(6):401-3.
Score: 0.269
-
Why are only 50% of courses of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents continued for only 2 years in some settings? Need for longterm observations in standard care to complement clinical trials. J Rheumatol. 2006 Dec; 33(12):2372-5.
Score: 0.269
-
Saving time and improving care with a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire: 10 practical considerations. J Rheumatol. 2006 Mar; 33(3):448-54.
Score: 0.255
-
Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006 Mar; 2(3):114-5.
Score: 0.255
-
Patient questionnaires for clinical research and improved standard patient care: is it better to have 80% of the information in 100% of patients or 100% of the information in 5% of patients? J Rheumatol. 2005 Apr; 32(4):575-7.
Score: 0.239
-
Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Apr; 52(4):1009-19.
Score: 0.239
-
Satisfaction With a Virtual Learning Collaborative Aimed at Implementing Treat-to-Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Aug 01; 28(5):265-269.
Score: 0.196
-
Implementing a Treat-to-Target Approach for Rheumatoid Arthritis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Virtual Learning Collaborative Program. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 04; 74(4):572-578.
Score: 0.192
-
Functional Status Measures and Indices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Comment on the Articles by Barber et al and England et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 08; 72(8):1185-1186.
Score: 0.172
-
Implementation of Treat-to-Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through a Learning Collaborative: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 07; 69(7):1374-1380.
Score: 0.139
-
The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep; 62(9):2582-91.
Score: 0.087
-
Quantitative measures to assess patients with rheumatic diseases: 2006 update. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006 Dec; 32 Suppl 1:29-36.
Score: 0.067
-
The disease activity score is not suitable as the sole criterion for initiation and evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the clinic: discordance between assessment measures and limitations in questionnaire use for regulatory purposes. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec; 52(12):3873-9.
Score: 0.063
-
Continuous indices of core data set measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: lower responses to placebo than seen with categorical responses with the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Apr; 52(4):1031-6.
Score: 0.060
-
Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or american college of rheumatology criteria for remission. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jun; 30(6):1138-46.
Score: 0.053
-
The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb 15; 49(1):59-63.
Score: 0.052
-
Remission and rheumatoid arthritis: data on patients receiving usual care in twenty-four countries. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep; 58(9):2642-51.
Score: 0.019