Header Logo

Connection

Jonathan Myers to Retrospective Studies

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jonathan Myers has written about Retrospective Studies.
Jonathan Myers
Connection Strength
1.410
Retrospective Studies
  1. Risk Assessment of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Access in Degenerative Spinal Conditions. Clin Spine Surg. 2022 08 01; 35(7):E601-E609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  2. Antithrombotic prescriptions for many general surgery patients significantly increases the likelihood of post-operative bleeding complications. Am J Surg. 2020 03; 219(3):453-459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  3. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Reclassification of Risk for Incidence of Heart Failure: The Veterans Exercise Testing Study. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jun; 10(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  4. The use of an essay examination in evaluating medical students during the surgical clerkship. Am J Surg. 2016 Jan; 211(1):274-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  5. Continuity of care in general surgery resident education. Am J Surg. 2015 Jul; 210(1):175-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  6. Laparoscopy has a superior diagnostic yield than percutaneous image-guided biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2496-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  7. Insurance status and outcomes in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Oct; 24(5):457-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  8. Radiographic predictability of hiatal hernia prior to gastric band surgery. JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun; 18(2):243-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  9. A neural network approach to predicting outcomes in heart failure using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 01; 171(2):265-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  10. Higher clinical performance during a surgical clerkship is independently associated with matriculation of medical students into general surgery. Am J Surg. 2014 Apr; 207(4):623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  11. NBME subject examination in surgery scores correlate with surgery clerkship clinical experience. J Surg Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr; 71(2):205-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  12. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep; 17(3):385-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  13. Validation of a cardiopulmonary exercise test score in heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Mar; 6(2):211-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  14. Frequency of adjustments and weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2012 Dec; 22(12):1880-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  15. Routine postoperative upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy is unnecessary after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep; 24(9):2188-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  16. Quality of life after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the Baros and Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec; 10(4):414-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  17. Treatment of massive super-obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Jan-Feb; 2(1):37-40; discussion 40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  18. Inadvertent Burst Suppression During Total Intravenous Anesthesia in 112 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Quality Improvement Project. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 01; 34(3):300-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  19. Longer Operative Time and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Are Associated with Postoperative Anastomotic Leak after Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery. Am Surg. 2019 Feb 01; 85(2):136-141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  20. Quantification of risk factors in 500 patients with postoperative urinary retention. Can J Urol. 2017 Apr; 24(2):8705-8707.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  21. Common side closure type, but not stapler brand or oversewing, influences side-to-side anastomotic leak rates. Am J Surg. 2017 Mar; 213(3):590-595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  22. Primary Anastomosis versus Ostomy after Colon Resection during Debulking of Ovarian Carcinomatosis: A NSQIP Analysis. Am Surg. 2016 Apr; 82(4):302-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  23. A NSQIP Analysis of MELD and Perioperative Outcomes in General Surgery. Am Surg. 2015 Aug; 81(8):755-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  24. The impact of operative timing on outcomes of appendicitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis. Am J Surg. 2015 Mar; 209(3):498-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  25. Improved patient outcomes in paraesophageal hernia repair using a laparoscopic approach: a study of the national surgical quality improvement program data. Am Surg. 2014 Sep; 80(9):884-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  26. Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2014 May; 28(5):1648-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  27. Long-term efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of biliary dyskinesia. Am J Surg. 2014 Mar; 207(3):366-70; discussion 369-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  28. Permanent mesh results in long-term symptom improvement and patient satisfaction without increasing adverse outcomes in hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2014 Mar; 207(3):445-8; discussion 448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  29. Heart rate at rest, exercise capacity, and mortality risk in veterans. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15; 112(10):1605-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. Resident training in single-incision compared with traditional cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep; 17(3):361-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  31. Ability to sit and rise from the floor as a predictor of all-cause mortality. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jul; 21(7):892-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Ventilatory power: a novel index that enhances prognostic assessment of patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Sep 01; 5(5):621-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  33. Long-term symptom relief and patient satisfaction after Heller myotomy and Toupet fundoplication for achalasia. Am J Surg. 2012 Mar; 203(3):339-42; discussion 342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  34. Low lifetime recreational activity is a risk factor for peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug; 54(2):427-32, 432.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  35. Predictors of impaired heart rate recovery: a myocardial perfusion SPECT study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Jun; 17(3):303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  36. A graded association of exercise capacity and all-cause mortality in males with high-normal blood pressure. Blood Press. 2009; 18(5):261-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  37. Prognostic value of double product reserve. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct; 15(5):541-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  38. The role of neutropenia on outcomes of cancer patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2009 Jan; 33(1):142-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  39. The prognostic value of T wave amplitude in lead aVR in males. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2008 Apr; 13(2):113-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  40. Laparoscopic ultrasound as the primary method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan; 22(1):208-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  41. Clinical predictors of latanoprost treatment effect. J Glaucoma. 2005 Aug; 14(4):260-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  42. Early repolarization in patients with spinal cord injury: prevalence and clinical significance. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002; 25(1):33-8; discussion 39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  43. Do angiogenesis and growth factor expression predict prognosis of esophageal cancer? Am Surg. 2000 Apr; 66(4):401-5; discussion 405-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.