Header Logo

Connection

Meenakshi Jolly to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Meenakshi Jolly has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

1.497
  1. Validation of the LupusPRO version 1.8: an update to a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2018 Apr; 27(5):728-737.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  2. Systemic lupus erythematosus: The promise of PROMIS - is it ready for prime time in SLE? Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 08; 13(8):453-454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  3. Prospective Validation of the Lupus Impact Tracker: A Patient-Completed Tool for Clinical Practice to Evaluate the Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 06; 68(6):1422-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  4. Lupus Impact Tracker is responsive to physician and patient assessed changes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015 Dec; 24(14):1486-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  5. Validation of the LupusPRO in Chinese patients from Hong Kong with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb; 67(2):297-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  6. Development and validation of the Lupus Impact Tracker: a patient-completed tool for clinical practice to assess and monitor the impact of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Oct; 66(10):1542-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  7. The French-Canadian validation of a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure for lupus. Lupus. 2014 Dec; 23(14):1452-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  8. Turkish lupusPRO: cross-cultural validation study for lupus. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Aug; 33(8):1079-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  9. Cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for systemic lupus erythematosus in Canada. J Rheumatol. 2013 Aug; 40(8):1327-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  10. Disease-specific patient reported outcome tools for systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug; 42(1):56-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  11. A brief assessment tool for body image in systemic lupus erythematosus. Body Image. 2012 Mar; 9(2):279-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  12. Lupus-specific health outcome measure for US patients: the LupusQoL-US version. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan; 69(1):29-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  13. Psychometric properties of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun; 36(6):1209-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  14. Korean LupusPRO: Cross-Cultural validation study for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2022 Oct; 31(12):1498-1507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  15. The Arabic LupusPRO: A Cross-Cultural Validation of a Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Quality of Life in Lupus Patients. Lupus. 2020 Nov; 29(13):1727-1735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  16. Performance and psychometric properties of lupus impact tracker in assessing patient-reported outcomes in pediatric lupus: Report from a pilot study. Lupus. 2020 Nov; 29(13):1781-1789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  17. Validation of SIMPLE Index for Lupus Disease Activity. J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Sep; 24(6):313-318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  18. A multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the LupusPRO between southern California and Filipino samples of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2017 Aug; 26(9):967-974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  19. The Japanese LupusPRO: A cross-cultural validation of an outcome measure for lupus. Lupus. 2017 Jul; 26(8):849-856.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  20. Validation of the Lupus Impact Tracker in an Australian patient cohort. Lupus. 2017 Jan; 26(1):98-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.