Header Logo

Connection

Rami Doukky to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Rami Doukky has written about Humans.
Rami Doukky
Connection Strength
2.776
Humans
  1. Is dyspnea the new angina? The ever-changing profile of patients referred for CAD evaluation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 08; 30(4):1321-1323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  2. ASNC SPECT-MPI quality metrics: a race to the top. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 06; 30(3):911-914.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  3. Impact of change of ischemic burden on the outcomes of ESRD patients awaiting kidney transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 10; 30(5):1897-1903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. The prognostic and diagnostic implications of surveillance serial myocardial perfusion imaging in asymptomatic renal transplant candidates. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 02; 30(1):152-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  5. Left Ventricular Intramyocardial Dissecting Hematoma: A Multimodality Imaging Diagnostic Approach. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 07; 14(7):e012410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  6. Coronary artery calcium or epicardial fat: Different markers for different people. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 08; 29(4):1593-1595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  7. Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for liver transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 06; 29(3):1078-1090.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  8. Invasive therapy versus conservative therapy for patients with stable coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2021 May; 44(5):675-682.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  9. The Prognostic Value of MPI in CKD: Can we do better? J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Feb; 29(1):155-157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  10. The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 04; 29(2):810-821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  11. The prognostic utility of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease: The largest cohort to date. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Feb; 29(1):101-110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  12. BRASH Syndrome with Hyperkalemia: An Under-Recognized Clinical Condition. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jul-Sep; 16(3):241-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  13. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 12; 28(6):2799-2807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  14. Impact of pretransplant mitral annular calcification on the incidence of cardiac events after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 03 01; 35(3):526-533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  15. Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium score: A marriage made in heaven. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 10; 28(5):2097-2099.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  16. Challenges in prediction of right ventricular failure among recipients of a left ventricular assist device. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 02; 28(1):309-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  17. Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Oct; 19(5):465-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  18. Assessment of myocardial viability using single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2019 09; 34(5):473-483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  19. Massive obliterative right heart thrombus presenting with near-syncope. Echocardiography. 2019 08; 36(8):1596-1597.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  20. Prognostic value of regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 06; 28(3):967-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  21. The diagnostic and prognostic utility of risk factors defined by the AHA/ACCF on the evaluation of cardiac disease in liver transplantation candidates. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 05 02; 19(1):102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  22. Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology. J Nucl Med. 2019 Aug; 60(8):1042-1043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  23. Straining for New Prognostic Predictors?in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 01; 13(1 Pt 1):22-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  24. Bleeding Risk of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients With Esophageal Varices. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 05; 32(5):674-676.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  25. Use of ultrasound enhancing agents in transesophageal echocardiography to improve interpretive confidence of left atrial appendage thrombus. Echocardiography. 2019 02; 36(2):362-369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  26. Usefulness of Oximetry Paradoxus to Diagnose Cardiac Tamponade. Am J Cardiol. 2019 02 01; 123(3):498-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  27. Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 10; 27(5):1521-1532.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  28. Clinical predictors and outcomes of patients with pericardial effusion in chronic kidney disease. Clin Cardiol. 2018 May; 41(5):660-665.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  29. Dual isotope stress Tl-201 and rest Tc-99m CZT SPECT: Are we truly leveraging CZT technology? J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 08; 26(4):1280-1283.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  30. The long-term prognostic value of highly sensitive cardiac troponin I in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Cardiol. 2017 Dec; 40(12):1271-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  31. Deciding wisely: A case for an effective use of myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 02; 25(1):53-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  32. The prognostic value of heart rate response during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing renal transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 06; 26(3):814-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  33. Regadenoson use in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: A focused review. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 02; 25(1):137-149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  34. Validation of a clinical pathway to assess asymptomatic renal transplant candidates using myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 12; 25(6):2058-2068.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  35. Promoting Appropriate Use of Cardiac Imaging: No Longer an Academic Exercise. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 21; 166(6):438-440.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  36. The significance of post-stress decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients undergoing regadenoson stress gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 08; 25(4):1313-1323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  37. Impact of integrating heart rate response with perfusion imaging on the prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 10; 24(5):1666-1671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  38. Derivation and validation of E/e' ratio as a parameter in the evaluation of left atrial appendage thrombus formation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep; 32(9):1349-1356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  39. Impact of Appropriate Use on the Estimated Radiation Risk to Men and Women Undergoing Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug; 57(8):1251-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  40. Impact of Diastolic Function Parameters on the Risk for Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 06; 29(6):545-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  41. Safety of stress testing in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers: Are all modalities created equal? J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 04; 24(2):735-737.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  42. Impact of Physical Inactivity on Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 01; 117(7):1135-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  43. Impact of B-type natriuretic peptide level on the risk of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016 Jan 16; 14:4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  44. Impact of Dietary Sodium Restriction on Heart Failure Outcomes. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Jan; 4(1):24-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  45. Appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Are they appropriate for women? J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 08; 23(4):695-705.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  46. Prognostic value of heart rate response during regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end stage renal disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 06; 23(3):560-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  47. The prognostic value of regadenoson stress: Has the case been made? J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Aug; 22(4):608-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  48. Impact of insurance carrier, prior authorization, and socioeconomic status on appropriate use of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in private community-based office practice. Clin Cardiol. 2015 May; 38(5):267-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  49. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson-stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Aug; 22(4):700-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  50. The significance of automatically measured transient ischemic dilation in identifying severe and extensive coronary artery disease in regadenoson, single-isotope technetium-99m myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun; 22(3):526-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  51. Prognostic implications of stress modality on mortality risk and cause of death in patients undergoing office-based SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Apr; 23(2):202-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  52. The prognostic value of undetectable highly sensitive cardiac troponin I in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2015 Mar; 147(3):685-694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  53. Effective risk stratification of patients on the basis of myocardial perfusion SPECT is dependent on appropriate patient selection. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Jan; 17(1):549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  54. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Evaluation of Liver Transplant Candidates. Angiology. 2015 Oct; 66(9):803-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  55. Severe chronic kidney disease as a predictor of benefit from aminophylline administration in patients undergoing regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging: A substudy of the ASSUAGE and ASSUAGE-CKD trials. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct; 22(5):1008-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  56. Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney or liver transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Apr; 22(2):282-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  57. Are cardiologists truly better at appropriately selecting patients for stress myocardial perfusion imaging? Int J Cardiol. 2014 Sep; 176(1):285-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  58. Rheumatic heart disease in modern urban America: a cohort study of immigrant and indigenous patients in Chicago. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15; 175(1):178-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  59. Hyperthyroid atrial fibrillation: does it matter for stroke risk? Cardiology. 2014; 128(1):51-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  60. Regadenoson use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the state of current knowledge. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014; 9:129-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  61. Age and gender as predictors of benefit from aminophylline administration in patients undergoing regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a substudy of the ASSUAGE trial. Am J Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec; 20(6):622-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  62. Reply: To PMID 23496263. Echocardiography. 2013 Oct; 30(9):1122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  63. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 2013 Oct 08; 128(15):1634-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  64. The prognostic value of transient ischemic dilatation with otherwise normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a cautionary note in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Oct; 20(5):774-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  65. A simple validated clinical tool to predict the absence of coronary artery disease in patients with systolic heart failure of unclear etiology. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15; 112(8):1165-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  66. B-type natriuretic peptide predicts left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Echocardiography. 2013 Sep; 30(8):889-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  67. External validation of a novel transthoracic echocardiographic tool in predicting left atrial appendage thrombus formation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Sep; 14(9):876-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  68. The safety and tolerability of regadenoson in patients with end-stage renal disease: the first prospective evaluation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Apr; 20(2):205-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  69. Attenuation of the side effect profile of regadenoson: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with aminophylline in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging and have severe chronic kidney disease--the ASSUAGE-CKD trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun; 29(5):1029-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  70. Attenuation of the side effect profile of regadenoson: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study with aminophylline in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. "The ASSUAGE trial". J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun; 19(3):448-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  71. Soft tissue attenuation patterns in stress myocardial perfusion SPECT images: a comparison between supine and upright acquisition systems. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Apr; 18(2):281-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  72. Ambulatory cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography at the primary care physician's office: a descriptive study. J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Oct-Dec; 33(4):328-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  73. Chronological comparison of TAVI and SAVR stratified to surgical risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Acta Cardiol. 2023 Sep; 78(7):778-789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  74. A Vision for the Future of Quality in Echocardiographic Reporting: The American Society of Echocardiography ImageGuideEcho Registry, Current and Future States. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 08; 36(8):805-811.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  75. Prevalence and predictors of Twiddler's syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun; 46(6):454-458.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  76. Quality metrics for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: an ASNC information statement. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 04; 30(2):864-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  77. Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2023 01 15; 187:84-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  78. Abbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Nov; 22(6):633-645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  79. Part II: risk stratification in patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: evidence-based review. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 May; 14(5):254-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  80. Novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 06; 99(7):2101-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  81. Impact of pulmonary embolism on perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft. Coron Artery Dis. 2022 11 01; 33(7):590-592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  82. Risk stratification in patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: evidence-based review. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Apr; 14(4):215-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  83. Right ventricle assessment in patients with pulmonary embolism at low risk for death based on clinical models: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2021 08 31; 42(33):3190-3199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  84. Contribution of individual components to composite end points in contemporary cardiovascular randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2020 12; 230:71-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  85. Comparison of planar with tomographic pyrophosphate scintigraphy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: Perils and pitfalls. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 02; 28(1):104-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  86. Elderly Medication Adherence Intervention Using the My Interventional Drug-Eluting Stent Educational App: Multisite Randomized Feasibility Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 06 24; 8(6):e15900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  87. Cochrane corner: transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk. Heart. 2020 07; 106(14):1043-1045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  88. How well do we represent ourselves: an analysis of cardiology fellowships website content. Future Cardiol. 2020 07; 16(4):281-287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  89. Systematic review and meta-analysis of current risk models in predicting short-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 17; 15(17):1497-1505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  90. Assessing the quality of reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials published in high impact cardiovascular journals. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 04 01; 6(2):177-179.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  91. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 12 20; 12:CD013319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  92. Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 12; 12(12):e005755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  93. Impact of chronic thrombocytopenia on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 08; 96(2):413-421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  94. Quadripolar versus bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: An analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2020 01; 17(1):81-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  95. Intermittent pneumatic compression in patients with ESRD. A systematic review. Hemodial Int. 2019 10; 23(4):433-444.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  96. Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 05 03; 2(5):e192622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  97. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 05; 12(5):e005260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  98. Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Interv Cardiol. 2019; 2019:2753146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  99. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2019 07 01; 124(1):158-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  100. Meta-analysis of use of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2019 09 15; 291:134-139.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  101. Impact of Hospice and Palliative Care Service Utilization on All-Cause 30-Day Readmission Rate for Older Adults Hospitalized with Heart Failure. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jul; 36(7):623-629.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  102. Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2018 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 04; 26(2):645-654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  103. Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: an ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 12 20; 20(1):87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  104. Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: An ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Jun; 26(3):1007-1014.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  105. Coming-of-age: The ImageGuide? Registry at three. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 02; 26(1):72-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  106. Association between lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation and mortality in the oldest old. Clin Cardiol. 2018 May; 41(5):634-639.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  107. Design of a bilevel clinical trial targeting adherence in heart failure patients and their providers: The Congestive Heart Failure Adherence Redesign Trial (CHART). Am Heart J. 2018 Jan; 195:139-150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  108. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures : Standardized reporting of nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 12; 24(6):2064-2128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  109. Mean Arterial Pressure to Central Venous Pressure Ratio: A Novel Marker for Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement. J Card Fail. 2017 Jun; 23(6):446-452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  110. Indirect Comparison of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Women with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 03; 26(3):214-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  111. Lipoprotein(a) and Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Women. Clin Cardiol. 2016 Feb; 39(2):96-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  112. The Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on In-Hospital Mortality of Ventricular Assist Device Recipients. J Card Fail. 2016 Mar; 22(3):226-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  113. Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 08; 23(4):680-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  114. ASNC/SNMMI Model Coverage Policy: Myocardial sympathetic innervation imaging: Iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-mIBG). J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Aug; 22(4):804-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  115. Congestive heart failure adherence redesign trial: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 04; 4(12):e006542.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  116. Feasibility of intercity and trans-Atlantic telerobotic remote ultrasound: assessment facilitated by a nondedicated bandwidth connection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Aug; 7(8):804-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  117. Tissue Doppler imaging for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012 Nov 30; 10:47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  118. Predictors of diastolic dysfunction among minority patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 May; 88(2):189-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.