Header Logo

Connection

Rami Doukky to Treatment Outcome

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Rami Doukky has written about Treatment Outcome.
Connection Strength

0.999
  1. Invasive therapy versus conservative therapy for patients with stable coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2021 May; 44(5):675-682.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  2. BRASH Syndrome with Hyperkalemia: An Under-Recognized Clinical Condition. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jul-Sep; 16(3):241-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  3. The prognostic value of heart rate response during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing renal transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 06; 26(3):814-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  4. Impact of integrating heart rate response with perfusion imaging on the prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 10; 24(5):1666-1671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  5. Impact of Dietary Sodium Restriction on Heart Failure Outcomes. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Jan; 4(1):24-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  6. The prognostic value of transient ischemic dilatation with otherwise normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a cautionary note in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Oct; 20(5):774-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  7. Attenuation of the side effect profile of regadenoson: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with aminophylline in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging and have severe chronic kidney disease--the ASSUAGE-CKD trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun; 29(5):1029-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  8. Attenuation of the side effect profile of regadenoson: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study with aminophylline in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. "The ASSUAGE trial". J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun; 19(3):448-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  9. Chronological comparison of TAVI and SAVR stratified to surgical risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Acta Cardiol. 2023 Sep; 78(7):778-789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  10. Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2023 01 15; 187:84-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Feasibility and safety of laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with prior left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 11; 33(11):2389-2393.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  12. Abbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Nov; 22(6):633-645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  13. Novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 06; 99(7):2101-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. Contribution of individual components to composite end points in contemporary cardiovascular randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2020 12; 230:71-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Cochrane corner: transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk. Heart. 2020 07; 106(14):1043-1045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of current risk models in predicting short-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 17; 15(17):1497-1505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 12 20; 12:CD013319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  18. Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 12; 12(12):e005755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  19. Impact of chronic thrombocytopenia on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 08; 96(2):413-421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  20. Quadripolar versus bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: An analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2020 01; 17(1):81-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  21. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2019 07 01; 124(1):158-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  22. Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: an ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 12 20; 20(1):87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  23. Coming-of-age: The ImageGuide? Registry at three. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 02; 26(1):72-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  24. Design of a bilevel clinical trial targeting adherence in heart failure patients and their providers: The Congestive Heart Failure Adherence Redesign Trial (CHART). Am Heart J. 2018 Jan; 195:139-150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  25. Indirect Comparison of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Women with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 03; 26(3):214-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  26. The Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on In-Hospital Mortality of Ventricular Assist Device Recipients. J Card Fail. 2016 Mar; 22(3):226-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  27. Congestive heart failure adherence redesign trial: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 04; 4(12):e006542.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.