Philip Bonomi to Paclitaxel
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Philip Bonomi has written about Paclitaxel.
Connection Strength
1.981
-
Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 May 20; 98(10):1608-13.
Score: 0.321
-
Chemoradiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2001; 105:171-88.
Score: 0.193
-
Postoperative bronchopulmonary complications in stage III lung cancer patients treated with preoperative paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy and concurrent radiation. Semin Oncol. 1997 Aug; 24(4 Suppl 12):S12-123-S12-129.
Score: 0.152
-
Escalating paclitaxel doses combined with carboplatin/etoposide and thoracic radiotherapy as preoperative or definitive treatment for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 1996 Dec; 23(6 Suppl 16):102-7.
Score: 0.145
-
Carboplatin/etoposide/radiation plus escalating doses of paclitaxel in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report. Semin Oncol. 1995 Aug; 22(4 Suppl 9):42-7.
Score: 0.133
-
Quality of life analyses from the randomized, open-label, phase III PointBreak study of pemetrexed-carboplatin-bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed-bevacizumab versus paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Feb; 10(2):353-9.
Score: 0.128
-
Randomized phase II study of cetuximab and bevacizumab in combination with two regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin in chemonaive patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Mar; 8(3):338-45.
Score: 0.112
-
Split-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience of 144 patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Jun; 6(6):1079-86.
Score: 0.099
-
Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: prognostic factors and treatment selection based on two large randomized clinical trials. J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Jul; 4(7):869-74.
Score: 0.087
-
Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX, CT-2103): macromolecular medicine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 Apr; 7(4):415-22.
Score: 0.074
-
PIONEER: a phase III randomized trial of paclitaxel poliglumex versus paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive women with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer and performance status of 2. Clin Lung Cancer. 2006 May; 7(6):417-9.
Score: 0.070
-
Multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2000 Jun; 11(6):673-8.
Score: 0.046
-
Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb; 18(3):623-31.
Score: 0.045
-
Activity of docetaxel in platinum-treated non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a phase II multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan; 18(1):131-5.
Score: 0.045
-
Paclitaxel steady-state plasma concentration as a determinant of disease outcome and toxicity in lung cancer patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Apr; 5(4):767-74.
Score: 0.043
-
Review of paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 1999 Feb; 26(1 Suppl 2):55-9.
Score: 0.042
-
Recent advances with chemotherapy for NSCLC: the ECOG experience. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Jan; 12(1 Suppl 2):67-70.
Score: 0.039
-
Cisplatin/etoposide vs paclitaxel/cisplatin/G-CSF vs paclitaxel/cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 1997 Apr; 11(4 Suppl 3):9-10.
Score: 0.037
-
Efficacy and Tolerability of Palliative Split-Course Thoracic Chemoradiotherapy for Symptomatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec; 38(6):605-9.
Score: 0.034
-
Exploratory Subset Analysis of African Americans From the PointBreak Study: Pemetrexed-Carboplatin-Bevacizumab Followed by Maintenance Pemetrexed-Bevacizumab Versus Paclitaxel-Carboplatin-Bevacizumab Followed by?Maintenance Bevacizumab in Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 May; 16(3):200-8.
Score: 0.032
-
PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 01; 31(34):4349-57.
Score: 0.029
-
Treatment rationale and study design for the pointbreak study: a randomized, open-label phase III study of pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed/bevacizumab versus paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2009 Jul; 10(4):252-6.
Score: 0.022
-
Randomized phase II study of vandetanib alone or with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20; 26(33):5407-15.
Score: 0.021
-
Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 01; 23(25):5883-91.
Score: 0.017
-
Early change in patient-reported health during lung cancer chemotherapy predicts clinical outcomes beyond those predicted by baseline report: results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study 5592. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15; 21(8):1536-43.
Score: 0.014