Header Logo

Connection

James Chu to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications James Chu has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.366
  1. Scatter imaging during lung stereotactic body radiation therapy characterized with phantom studies. Phys Med Biol. 2020 08 10; 65(15):155013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  2. Compton scatter imaging: A promising modality for image guidance in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2018 Mar; 45(3):1233-1240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  3. Characterization of Compton-scatter imaging with an analytical simulation method. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 11; 63(2):025016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  4. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent. Brachytherapy. 2014 Jul-Aug; 13(4):352-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  5. Thermal effusivity: a promising imaging biomarker to predict radiation-induced skin injuries. Health Phys. 2012 Aug; 103(2):204-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  6. A simplified technique for delivering total body irradiation (TBI) with improved dose homogeneity. Med Phys. 2012 Apr; 39(4):2239-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  7. Comparison of computed tomography scout based reference point localization to conventional film and axial computed tomography. Med Dosim. 2011; 36(4):410-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  8. Detection of electron beam energy variations using a computed radiography system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Oct 15; 10(4):142-150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  9. Application of holographic display in radiotherapy treatment planning II: a multi-institutional study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 May 28; 10(3):115-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  10. Performance of magnetic field-guided navigation system for interventional neurosurgical and cardiac procedures. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005; 6(3):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  11. Monte Carlo calculations of output factors for clinically shaped electron fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004; 5(2):42-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  12. Three-dimensional photon dosimetry: a comparison of treatment of the intact breast in the supine and prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 01; 57(3):891-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Comment on "A Monte Carlo study of IMRT beamlets in inhomogeneous media". Med Phys. 2003 Jul; 30(7):1932; author reply 1933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  14. Acoustic-based proton range verification in heterogeneous tissue: simulation studies. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 11; 63(2):025018.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  15. Dosimetric effects of saline- versus water-filled balloon applicators for IORT using the model S700 electronic brachytherapy source. Brachytherapy. 2018 Mar - Apr; 17(2):500-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  16. Reporting small bowel dose in cervix cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Med Dosim. 2016; 41(1):28-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  17. The sensitivity of ArcCHECK-based gamma analysis to manufactured errors in helical tomotherapy radiation delivery. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Jan 08; 16(1):4814.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  18. A virtual matching technique for three-field breast irradiation using 3-D planning. Phys Med. 2009 Dec; 25(4):212-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  19. Evaluation of four volume-based image registration algorithms. Med Dosim. 2009; 34(4):317-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  20. A dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and MammoSite partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy. 2006 Jul-Sep; 5(3):183-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. Cosmetic outcome and incidence of infection with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. Breast J. 2005 Sep-Oct; 11(5):306-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  22. Surface optimization technique for MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jun 01; 62(2):366-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  23. The MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator: a review of technique and outcomes. Brachytherapy. 2005; 4(2):130-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  24. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis: a case series. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2004 Oct-Dec; 5(4):162-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  25. Treatment volume and dose optimization of MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 01; 59(2):469-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  26. Dose perturbation induced by radiographic contrast inside brachytherapy balloon applicators. Med Phys. 2004 May; 31(5):1219-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  27. Intracoronary beta brachytherapy as a treatment option for high-risk refractory in-stent restenosis; Compassionate use. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2004 Jan-Mar; 5(1):9-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  28. Correlates of failure following treatment with Sr-90 beta irradiation for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jun; 59(2):176-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Design optimization of intraoperative radiotherapy cones. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Apr 01; 55(5):1446-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  30. Predictors of late cardiac events following treatment with Sr-90 beta-irradiation for instent restenosis. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2003 Jan-Mar; 4(1):7-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  31. Visual assessment of procedural results following treatment with Sr-90 beta-radiation for instent restenosis. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2002 Jul-Dec; 3(3-4):133-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  32. Clinical outcomes of patients treated with the cutting balloon and Sr-90 beta-irradiation for instent restenosis. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2002 Jan-Mar; 3(1):12-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.