Nikhil Verma to Minimal Clinically Important Difference
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nikhil Verma has written about Minimal Clinically Important Difference.
Connection Strength
2.818
-
Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3447-3453.
Score: 0.695
-
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov; 28(11):2238-2246.
Score: 0.636
-
Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Allograft. Arthroscopy. 2022 05; 38(5):1444-1453.e1.
Score: 0.188
-
Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3479-3486.
Score: 0.180
-
Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3439-3446.
Score: 0.174
-
Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr; 30(4):e137-e146.
Score: 0.171
-
How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery? Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):241-250.
Score: 0.164
-
Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1567-1575.e3.
Score: 0.156
-
Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Apr; 28(4):639-647.
Score: 0.154
-
Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
Score: 0.048
-
Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct; 30(10):2231-2239.
Score: 0.045
-
Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1731-1739.
Score: 0.044
-
How can we define clinically important improvement in pain scores after biceps tenodesis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb; 30(2):430-438.
Score: 0.042
-
Influence of mental health on postoperative outcomes in patients following biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov; 29(11):2248-2256.
Score: 0.042
-
Predictive Factors and the Duration to Pre-Injury Work Status Following Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1026-1033.
Score: 0.039
-
Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
Score: 0.038