Nikhil Verma to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nikhil Verma has written about Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.
Connection Strength
6.054
-
Arthroscopic all - Inside repair of meniscal ramp lesions. J ISAKOS. 2022 08; 7(4):82-83.
Score: 0.679
-
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation May Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2255-2264.
Score: 0.666
-
Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
Score: 0.656
-
The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
Score: 0.649
-
Does Bone Plug and Graft Orientation (Inferior Versus Posterior) Alter Native Femoral Footprint Coverage in Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1875-1881.
Score: 0.583
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
Score: 0.388
-
Effects of graft rotation on initial biomechanical failure characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct; 31(5):708-13.
Score: 0.186
-
Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair Show Similar Improvement in Outcome Scores, But Repair Shows Higher Rates of Knee Stiffness and Failure: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 10; 39(10):2231-2240.
Score: 0.180
-
Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
Score: 0.168
-
Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
Score: 0.168
-
The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 02; 37(2):600-605.
Score: 0.151
-
Preoperative Opioid Use Predicts Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use and Inferior Patient Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2681-2688.e1.
Score: 0.149
-
Length of Time Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Return to Sport Does Not Predict Need for Revision Surgery in National Football League Players. Arthroscopy. 2019 01; 35(1):158-162.
Score: 0.135
-
Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
Score: 0.134
-
Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):740-752.
Score: 0.127
-
Dial Test: Unrecognized Predictor of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jul; 33(7):1375-1381.
Score: 0.119
-
Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
Score: 0.112
-
Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
Score: 0.109
-
Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
Score: 0.102
-
Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan; 24(1):51-7.
Score: 0.100
-
Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb; 37(2):e103-8.
Score: 0.096
-
Risks, benefits, and evidence-based recommendations for improving anterior cruciate ligament outcomes. Instr Course Lect. 2014; 63:369-82.
Score: 0.095
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with a transtibial technique? Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1306-15.
Score: 0.078
-
Can anatomic femoral tunnel placement be achieved using a transtibial technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1263-9.
Score: 0.078
-
Preliminary clinical results of two techniques for addressing graft tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2005 Jul; 18(3):183-91.
Score: 0.053
-
Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
Score: 0.026
-
Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
Score: 0.025
-
Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
Score: 0.025
-
Avoiding mismatch in allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation between patient height and patellar tendon length. Arthroscopy. 2010 May; 26(5):643-50.
Score: 0.018