Header Logo

Connection

Scott Sporer to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Sporer has written about Humans.
Scott Sporer
Connection Strength
1.497
Humans
  1. Knee Arthrodesis With an Intramedullary Antegrade Rod as a Salvage Procedure for the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 09; 4(9):e20.00082-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  2. Spacer Design Options and Consideration for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2020 03; 35(3S):S31-S34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  3. Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct 15; 27(20):743-751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  4. High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1395-1399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  5. Routine Use of Radiostereometric Analysis in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: Surgical Impact, Safety, and Bead Stability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Apr 15; 26(8):e173-e180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  6. Nephrotoxicity After the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7):2225-2229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  7. Systemic Absorption of Antibiotics From Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):835-839.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  8. Perceived Leg-Length Discrepancy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Knee Alignment Play a Role? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec; 45(7):E429-E433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  9. Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):144-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  10. Postoperative Pain Management After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Value of Liposomal Bupivacaine. J Arthroplasty. 2016 11; 31(11):2603-2607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  11. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  12. Acute hematogenous infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar; 29(3):469-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  13. The effect of payer type on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):295-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  14. 2012 annual meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS). J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Utility of trephine reamers in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan; 29(1):210-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov; 470(11):3156-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  18. Cutaneous manifestation of metallosis in a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty after acetabular liner dissociation. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8):1580.e13-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  19. How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. Instr Course Lect. 2012; 61:303-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  20. Treatment of early postoperative infections after THA: a decision analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec; 469(12):3477-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  21. How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20; 93(14):1359-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  22. Early aseptic loosening with a precoated low-profile tibial component: a case series. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec; 26(8):1445-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  23. Porous metal augments: big hopes for big holes. Orthopedics. 2010 Sep 07; 33(9):651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  24. External iliac artery injury complicating prosthetic hip resection for infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun; 25(4):660.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  25. The feasibility and perioperative complications of outpatient knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun; 467(6):1443-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  26. "An anatomic study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):640; author reply 640-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  27. A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6):918-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  28. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):83-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  29. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):87-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. The geographic incidence and treatment variation of common fractures of elderly patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Apr; 14(4):246-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  31. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:92-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb; 443:266-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  33. The minimally invasive subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2006 Jan; 19(1):58-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  34. Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. Instr Course Lect. 2006; 55:287-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  35. The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec; 441:216-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  36. The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun; 20(4 Suppl 2):79-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  37. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr; 87(4):760-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  38. Decision analysis in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Feb; (431):250-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  39. Biologic fixation and bone ingrowth. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jan; 36(1):105-11, vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  40. Case report: Salmonella infection following total hip arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J. 2005; 25:42-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  41. Extensively coated cementless femoral components in revision total hip arthoplasty: an update. Surg Technol Int. 2005; 14:265-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  42. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):227-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  43. Primary total hip arthroplasty using a modular proximally coated prosthesis in patients older than 70: two to eight year results. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Feb; 19(2):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  44. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Dec; (417):203-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  45. Controlled femoral fracture: easy in. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):91-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  46. Modern Description of Antibiotic Spacer Options for PJI in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Infection Eradication Rates. J Arthroplasty. 2023 06; 38(6S):S318-S325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  47. Hip dislocation in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Jan-Feb; 23(1):10-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  48. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine in Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023 04; 38(4):763-768.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  49. Ketamine in Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, and Knee Society. J Arthroplasty. 2022 09; 37(9):1688-1690.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  50. Extensive periacetabular osteolysis presenting as a mass on rectal examination. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Aug; 84(8):1439-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  51. The Cost-Effectiveness of Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022 06; 37(6S):S50-S55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  52. Machine learning algorithms predict within one size of the final implant ultimately used in total knee arthroplasty with good-to-excellent accuracy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug; 30(8):2565-2572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  53. Trends of Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment Using Total Hip Arthroplasty: Reported From the American Joint Replacement Registry. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 01; 30(1):e44-e50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  54. Is American Joint Replacement Registry Data Representative of National Data? A Comparative Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 01; 30(1):e124-e130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  55. Conforming Polyethylene Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beyond the Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Debate. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Nov 15; 29(22):e1097-e1104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  56. The Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Total Joint Arthroplasty Care. J Arthroplasty. 2021 08; 36(8):2729-2733.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  57. Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2536-2540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  58. Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for Treatment of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 06; 36(6):2171-2177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  59. 2020 Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  60. A Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for the Treatment of Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 06; 102(9):778-787.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  61. Who Is Prescribing Opioids Preoperatively? A Survey of New Patients Presenting to Tertiary Care Adult Reconstruction Clinics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Apr 01; 28(7):301-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  62. Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1402-1406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  63. Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 02; 35(2):538-543.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  64. Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec; 34(12):3012-3017.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  65. Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1369-1373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  66. Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Patient's Perspective. Iowa Orthop J. 2019; 39(1):211-216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  67. Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Satisfaction After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 04; 34(4):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  68. Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 12; 33(12):3759-3767.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  69. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  70. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  71. Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):362-365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  72. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  73. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 08; 69(8):1111-1124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  74. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 08; 69(8):1538-1551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  75. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9):2628-2638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  76. Can Demographic Variables Accurately Predict Component Sizing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 10; 32(10):3004-3008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  77. Synovial Fluid Cell Count for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 03; 99(9):753-759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  78. Prospective Assessment of Sleep Quality Before and After Primary Total Joint Replacement. Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 01; 40(4):e636-e640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  79. Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):140-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  80. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  81. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  82. The Use of Structural Distal Femoral Allograft for Acetabular Reconstruction of Paprosky Type IIIA Defects at a Mean 21 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):680-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  83. Evaluation of the Role for Synovial Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 07; 97(19):1597-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  84. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  85. The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  86. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism failure following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 18; 97(4):279-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  87. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  88. How do I get out of this jam? Early postoperative problems of primary total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2015; 64:327-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  89. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):229-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  90. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  91. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  92. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Paprosky femoral bone loss classification system. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul; 29(7):1482-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  93. Author reply: "correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun; 29(6):1329-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  94. Correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):438-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  95. Correlation of aspiration results with aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct; 28(9):1671-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  96. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  97. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  98. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  99. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  100. Fracture of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty with an extensor mechanism allograft. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):375.e9-375.e12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  101. The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):126-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  102. Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 04; 94(7):594-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  103. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  104. Patient perception of physician reimbursement in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):703-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  105. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  106. Dilute betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jan; 27(1):27-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  107. What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):1002-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  108. Achieving stability and lower limb length in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:229-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  109. Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:269-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  110. Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17; 92(16):2737-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  111. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  112. A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec; 468(12):3348-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  113. Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun; 92(6):1518-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  114. Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May; 92(5):1282-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  115. Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun; 467(6):1424-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  116. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep; 90(9):1869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  117. Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  118. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  119. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct; 23(7):949-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  120. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  121. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  122. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul; 20(3):185-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  123. The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec; 453:183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  124. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006 Sep; 27(27):4671-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  125. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  126. Ankle fractures in the elderly: what you get depends on where you live and who you see. J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Oct; 19(9):635-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  127. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep; 87 Suppl 1(Pt 2):175-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  128. Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 02; 349(14):1350-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  129. Comparison of simultaneous bilateral with unilateral total knee arthroplasty in terms of perioperative complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct; 85(10):1981-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.