Scott Sporer to Femur
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Sporer has written about Femur.
Connection Strength
2.535
-
High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1395-1399.
Score: 0.504
-
Utility of trephine reamers in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan; 29(1):210-3.
Score: 0.336
-
The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:92-9.
Score: 0.204
-
The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr; 87(4):760-5.
Score: 0.192
-
Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):227-31.
Score: 0.187
-
Controlled femoral fracture: easy in. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):91-3.
Score: 0.167
-
Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
Score: 0.102
-
The Use of Structural Distal Femoral Allograft for Acetabular Reconstruction of Paprosky Type IIIA Defects at a Mean 21 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):680-3.
Score: 0.100
-
Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):555-60.
Score: 0.095
-
Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
Score: 0.088
-
The inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Paprosky femoral bone loss classification system. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul; 29(7):1482-4.
Score: 0.088
-
Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
Score: 0.083
-
Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
Score: 0.083
-
How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20; 93(14):1359-66.
Score: 0.074
-
Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
Score: 0.059
-
Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1402-1406.
Score: 0.033
-
Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1369-1373.
Score: 0.031
-
Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
Score: 0.028
-
Can Demographic Variables Accurately Predict Component Sizing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 10; 32(10):3004-3008.
Score: 0.028
-
Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
Score: 0.019
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:269-81.
Score: 0.018
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
Score: 0.015