Header Logo

Connection

Scott Sporer to Female

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Sporer has written about Female.
Scott Sporer
Connection Strength
1.219
Female
  1. Knee Arthrodesis With an Intramedullary Antegrade Rod as a Salvage Procedure for the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 09; 4(9):e20.00082-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  2. High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1395-1399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  3. Routine Use of Radiostereometric Analysis in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: Surgical Impact, Safety, and Bead Stability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Apr 15; 26(8):e173-e180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  4. Nephrotoxicity After the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7):2225-2229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  5. Systemic Absorption of Antibiotics From Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):835-839.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  6. Perceived Leg-Length Discrepancy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Knee Alignment Play a Role? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec; 45(7):E429-E433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  7. Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):144-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  8. Postoperative Pain Management After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Value of Liposomal Bupivacaine. J Arthroplasty. 2016 11; 31(11):2603-2607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  9. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  10. Acute hematogenous infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar; 29(3):469-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  11. Utility of trephine reamers in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan; 29(1):210-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  12. Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  13. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov; 470(11):3156-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  14. Cutaneous manifestation of metallosis in a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty after acetabular liner dissociation. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8):1580.e13-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  15. Early aseptic loosening with a precoated low-profile tibial component: a case series. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec; 26(8):1445-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  16. External iliac artery injury complicating prosthetic hip resection for infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun; 25(4):660.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  17. The feasibility and perioperative complications of outpatient knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun; 467(6):1443-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  18. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):83-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):87-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb; 443:266-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  21. The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec; 441:216-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  22. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr; 87(4):760-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  23. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):227-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  24. Primary total hip arthroplasty using a modular proximally coated prosthesis in patients older than 70: two to eight year results. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Feb; 19(2):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  25. Controlled femoral fracture: easy in. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):91-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  26. Hip dislocation in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Jan-Feb; 23(1):10-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  27. Trends of Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment Using Total Hip Arthroplasty: Reported From the American Joint Replacement Registry. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 01; 30(1):e44-e50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  28. 2020 Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  29. A Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for the Treatment of Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 06; 102(9):778-787.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  30. Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Patient's Perspective. Iowa Orthop J. 2019; 39(1):211-216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  31. Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Satisfaction After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 04; 34(4):663-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  32. Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 12; 33(12):3759-3767.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  33. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  34. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  35. Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):362-365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  36. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  37. Can Demographic Variables Accurately Predict Component Sizing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 10; 32(10):3004-3008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  38. Synovial Fluid Cell Count for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 03; 99(9):753-759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  39. Prospective Assessment of Sleep Quality Before and After Primary Total Joint Replacement. Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 01; 40(4):e636-e640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  40. Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):140-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  41. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  42. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  43. The Use of Structural Distal Femoral Allograft for Acetabular Reconstruction of Paprosky Type IIIA Defects at a Mean 21 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):680-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  44. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  45. The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  46. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):229-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  47. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  48. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  49. Author reply: "correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun; 29(6):1329-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  50. Correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):438-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  51. Correlation of aspiration results with aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct; 28(9):1671-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  52. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  53. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  54. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  55. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  56. Fracture of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty with an extensor mechanism allograft. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):375.e9-375.e12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  57. The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):126-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  58. Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 04; 94(7):594-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  59. Patient perception of physician reimbursement in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):703-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  60. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  61. Dilute betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jan; 27(1):27-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  62. What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):1002-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  63. Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17; 92(16):2737-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  64. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  65. A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec; 468(12):3348-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  66. Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun; 467(6):1424-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  67. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep; 90(9):1869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  68. Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  69. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  70. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct; 23(7):949-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  71. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  72. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  73. The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec; 453:183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  74. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  75. Ankle fractures in the elderly: what you get depends on where you live and who you see. J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Oct; 19(9):635-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  76. Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 02; 349(14):1350-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.