Header Logo

Connection

Scott Sporer to Reoperation

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Sporer has written about Reoperation.
Scott Sporer
Connection Strength
3.030
Reoperation
  1. Knee Arthrodesis With an Intramedullary Antegrade Rod as a Salvage Procedure for the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 09; 4(9):e20.00082-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  2. 2020 Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  3. Spacer Design Options and Consideration for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2020 03; 35(3S):S31-S34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  4. High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1395-1399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  5. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  6. Nephrotoxicity After the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7):2225-2229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  7. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  8. Systemic Absorption of Antibiotics From Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):835-839.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  9. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  10. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  11. The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  12. Utility of trephine reamers in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan; 29(1):210-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  13. Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  14. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov; 470(11):3156-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  15. How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. Instr Course Lect. 2012; 61:303-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  16. How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20; 93(14):1359-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  17. Early aseptic loosening with a precoated low-profile tibial component: a case series. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec; 26(8):1445-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  18. "An anatomic study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):640; author reply 640-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  19. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  20. A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6):918-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  21. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):83-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  22. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):87-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  23. Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. Instr Course Lect. 2006; 55:287-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  24. The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec; 441:216-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  25. The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun; 20(4 Suppl 2):79-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  26. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr; 87(4):760-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  27. Case report: Salmonella infection following total hip arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J. 2005; 25:42-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  28. Extensively coated cementless femoral components in revision total hip arthoplasty: an update. Surg Technol Int. 2005; 14:265-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  29. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):227-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  30. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Dec; (417):203-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  31. Modern Description of Antibiotic Spacer Options for PJI in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Infection Eradication Rates. J Arthroplasty. 2023 06; 38(6S):S318-S325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  32. The Cost-Effectiveness of Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022 06; 37(6S):S50-S55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  33. Trends of Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment Using Total Hip Arthroplasty: Reported From the American Joint Replacement Registry. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 01; 30(1):e44-e50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  34. Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2536-2540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  35. Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for Treatment of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 06; 36(6):2171-2177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  36. Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1402-1406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  37. Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 02; 35(2):538-543.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  38. Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec; 34(12):3012-3017.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  39. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  40. The Use of Structural Distal Femoral Allograft for Acetabular Reconstruction of Paprosky Type IIIA Defects at a Mean 21 Years of Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):680-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  41. Evaluation of the Role for Synovial Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 07; 97(19):1597-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  42. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  43. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  44. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):229-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  45. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  46. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  47. Correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):438-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  48. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  49. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  50. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  51. Fracture of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty with an extensor mechanism allograft. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):375.e9-375.e12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  52. The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):126-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  53. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  54. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  55. What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):1002-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  56. Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:269-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  57. Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17; 92(16):2737-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  58. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  59. A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec; 468(12):3348-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  60. Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun; 92(6):1518-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  61. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep; 90(9):1869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  62. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct; 23(7):949-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  63. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  64. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  65. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.