Header Logo

Connection

Kern Singh to Middle Aged

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kern Singh has written about Middle Aged.
Connection Strength

7.295
  1. Single-level TLIF Versus LLIF at L4-5: A Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes and Recovery Ratios. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 15; 30(4):e495-e505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  2. Impact of Prolonged Duration of Symptoms on Mental Health in Anterior Cervical Disectomy and Fusion Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 01; 30(1):e74-e82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  3. Workers' Compensation Association With Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion. Neurosurgery. 2022 03 01; 90(3):322-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  4. Time to Complete Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Lumbar Decompression. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec 01; 29(23):e1208-e1216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  5. Preoperative Physical Function Association With Mental Health Improvement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2021 12 01; 34(10):E559-E565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  6. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1. World Neurosurg. 2022 01; 157:e111-e122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  7. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF). World Neurosurg. 2021 12; 156:e254-e265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  8. Validation of VR-12 Physical Function in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy. World Neurosurg. 2021 11; 155:e362-e368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  9. Multimodal Analgesic Management for Lumbar Decompression Surgery in the Ambulatory Setting: Clinical Case Series and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2021 10; 154:e656-e664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  10. Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Impact Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2021 10; 154:e520-e528.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  11. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients. World Neurosurg. 2021 08; 152:e94-e100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  12. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 01; 46(9):603-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  13. A Validation of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for Cervical Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Dec 01; 45(23):1668-1675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  14. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF: 2-Year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Nov 15; 45(22):E1516-E1522.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  15. Patient Perceptions of Physician Ownership in Spine Care. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 10; 33(8):E369-E375.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  16. Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on PROMIS Physical Function Following a Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 01; 45(17):E1091-E1096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  17. PROMIS PF in the Evaluation of Postoperative Outcomes in Workers' Compensation Patients Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 08; 33(7):E312-E316.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  18. Diabetes Does Not Increase Complications, Length of Stay, or Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 08; 33(7):E307-E311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  19. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 07; 33(6):E263-E268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  20. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Postoperative PROMIS Physical Function Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 07; 33(6):E294-E298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  21. Validity of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 01; 45(11):E663-E669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  22. Complications Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Independent Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 06; 33(5):E236-E240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  23. All Disclosure is Good Disclosure: Patient Awareness of the Sunshine Act and Perceptions of Surgeon-Industry Relationships. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 04; 33(3):E96-E100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  24. The identification of risk factors for increased postoperative pain following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2020 06; 29(6):1304-1310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  25. The Influence of Preoperative Mental Health on PROMIS Physical Function Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Feb 15; 45(4):E236-E243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  26. Postoperative Outcomes Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Score After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 02; 33(1):E40-E42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  27. Evaluating the Concurrent Validity of PROMIS Physical Function in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 12; 32(10):449-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  28. PHQ-9 Score Predicts Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 12; 32(10):444-448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  29. The Effect of Tobacco Use on Postoperative Pain Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 12; 32(10):E440-E443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  30. Sex Differences on Postoperative Pain and Disability Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 12; 32(10):E444-E448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  31. Patient Activation is Not Associated With Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 12; 32(10):E453-E456.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  32. The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function to Predict Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 01; 44(23):E1388-E1395.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  33. Patient Perceptions of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 12; 32(10):430-434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  34. Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 15; 44(8):E494-E499.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  35. Impact of the Number of Levels on Adverse Events and Length of Stay Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion Procedures. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 04; 32(3):120-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  36. PROMIS Physical Function Score Strongly Correlates With Legacy Outcome Measures in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 03 15; 44(6):442-446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  37. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 03 01; 44(5):363-368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  38. Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? Clin Spine Surg. 2019 03; 32(2):E107-E111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  39. Risk Factors for a Long Hospital Stay Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 02; 32(1):E56-E59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  40. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After a Tubular Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 02; 32(1):E27-E30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  41. The Effect of Preoperative Medications on Length of Stay, Inpatient Pain, and Narcotics Consumption After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 02; 32(1):E37-E42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  42. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 15; 44(2):150-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  43. Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 11 09; 30(2):222-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  44. Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Analysis of Inpatient Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Costs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 09 15; 43(18):1307-1312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  45. Sex Differences for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Complications and Length of Stay. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 08 01; 43(15):1025-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  46. Does Day of Surgery Affect Hospital Length of Stay and Charges Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? Clin Spine Surg. 2018 06; 31(5):E291-E295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  47. Impact of local steroid application on dysphagia following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized single-blind trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 07; 29(1):10-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  48. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 07; 29(1):28-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  49. Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 04; 31(3):E184-E192.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  50. Variation in Spine Surgeon Selection Criteria Between Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery Patients. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 03; 31(2):E127-E132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  51. Is Body Mass Index a Risk Factor for Revision Procedures After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? Clin Spine Surg. 2018 02; 31(1):E85-E91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  52. Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 02; 31(1):E92-E97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  53. Radiographic Analysis of Psoas Morphology and its Association With Neurovascular Structures at L4-5 With Reference to Lateral Approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 15; 42(24):E1386-E1392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  54. Preoperative Mental Health is not Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes Following a Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1388-E1391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  55. The Utility of Routinely Obtaining Postoperative Laboratory Studies Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1405-E1410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  56. Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes, narcotics consumption, and hospital costs following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 02; 28(2):160-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  57. Narcotic Consumption Following Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov; 30(9):E1190-E1200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  58. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes, Narcotics Utilization, and Costs After an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Stand-alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov; 30(9):E1201-E1205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  59. Multimodal Analgesia Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Aug 01; 42(15):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  60. Improvements in Neck and Arm Pain Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15; 42(14):E825-E832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  61. Spinal Surgeon Variation in Single-Level Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Cost and Hospital Resource Utilization Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 01; 42(13):1031-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  62. Neuroforaminal Bone Growth Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With BMP: A Computed Tomographic Analysis. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul; 30(6):E754-E758.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  63. Effect of Surgeon Volume on Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs Following Anterior Cervical Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar 15; 42(6):394-399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  64. Effect of Surgery Start Time on Day of Discharge in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Dec 15; 41(24):1939-1944.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  65. Malnutrition Predicts Infectious and Wound Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Nov 01; 41(21):1693-1699.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  66. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Surgical Learning Curve. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Oct 15; 41(20):1580-1585.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  67. Preoperative mental health status may not be predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb; 26(2):177-182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  68. Patient knowledge regarding radiation exposure from spinal imaging. Spine J. 2017 03; 17(3):305-312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  69. Effects of Intraoperative Anesthetic Medications on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Sep 15; 41(18):1441-1446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  70. Spine Surgeon Selection Criteria: Factors Influencing Patient Choice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 01; 41(13):E814-E819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  71. Functional Capacity Evaluation Following Spinal Fusion Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 01; 41(13):1104-1110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  72. Multimodal Versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia After an Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun; 41(12):994-998.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  73. Incidence and Risk Factors for Pneumonia After Posterior Lumbar Fusion Procedures: An ACS-NSQIP Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun; 41(12):1058-1063.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  74. Does Greater Body Mass Index Increase the Risk for Revision Procedures Following a Single-Level Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May; 41(9):816-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  75. Incidence and risk factors for pneumonia following anterior cervical decompression and fusion procedures: an ACS-NSQIP study. Spine J. 2016 Mar; 16(3):335-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  76. Urinary Tract Infection Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion Procedures: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov; 40(22):1785-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  77. Primary Versus Revision Single-level Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Narcotic Utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 15; 40(18):E1025-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  78. Preoperative narcotic utilization: accuracy of patient self-reporting and its association with postoperative narcotic consumption. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan; 24(1):206-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  79. Postoperative Narcotic Consumption in Workman's Compensation Patients Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 15; 40(16):1284-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  80. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve. Spine J. 2016 08; 16(8):909-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  81. The Impact of Worker's Compensation Claims on Outcomes and Costs Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15; 40(12):948-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  82. The utility of obtaining routine hematological laboratory values following an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Sep 15; 39(20):E1228-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  83. Cost analysis of incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 01; 39(17):E1042-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  84. Body mass index as a predictor of complications and mortality after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 01; 39(10):798-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  85. Sentinel events in cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 20; 39(9):715-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  86. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of postoperative airway management after cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 20; 39(9):E557-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  87. Cerebral vascular accidents after lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15; 39(8):673-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  88. Comparison of revision surgeries for one- to two-level cervical TDR and ACDF from 2002 to 2011. Spine J. 2014 Dec 01; 14(12):2841-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  89. Perioperative characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion in July: analysis of the "July effect". Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 01; 39(7):612-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  90. Epidemiological trends in the utilization of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal fusions from 2002 to 2011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 15; 39(6):491-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  91. Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 15; 39(6):476-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  92. Complications after lumbar spine surgery between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 01; 39(5):417-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  93. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate versus rhBMP-2 in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 01; 39(3):185-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  94. Incidence, outcomes, and mortality of reintubation after anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 15; 39(2):134-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  95. Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 01; 39(1):53-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  96. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of spinal fusion for cervical trauma: weekday versus weekend admissions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 01; 38(25):2178-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  97. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1694-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  98. Incidence and risk factors for perioperative visual loss after spinal fusion. Spine J. 2014 Sep 01; 14(9):1866-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  99. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative ileus following anterior, posterior, and circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine J. 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1680-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  100. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve. Spine J. 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1460-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  101. Incidence and risk factors for dysphagia after anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 01; 38(21):1820-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  102. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15; 38(20):1790-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  103. Incidence, risk factors, and mortality associated with aspiration in cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 01; 38(19):E1189-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  104. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2013 Sep; 13(9):1118-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  105. Incidence and risk factors for gastrointestinal hemorrhage after lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 15; 38(18):1584-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  106. Incidence and mortality of cardiac events in lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 15; 38(16):1422-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  107. Hospital outcomes and complications of anterior and posterior cervical fusion with bone morphogenetic protein. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 01; 38(15):1304-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  108. Incidence and mortality of perioperative cardiac events in cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 01; 38(15):1268-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  109. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15; 38(14):1226-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  110. The incidence and mortality of thromboembolic events in lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 01; 38(13):1154-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  111. Outcomes of cervical spine surgery in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 01; 38(13):1089-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  112. The incidence and mortality of thromboembolic events in cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20; 38(9):E521-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  113. Predictive factors of hospital stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 15; 37(24):2046-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  114. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15; 37(22):1914-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  115. Lumbar extracavitary corpectomy with a single stage circumferential arthrodesis: surgical technique and clinical series. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Jul; 41(7):316-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  116. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial. Spine J. 2012 May; 12(5):372-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  117. Minimally invasive thoracolumbar corpectomy and reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2012 Jan 16; 35(1):e74-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  118. Age-related changes in the extracellular matrix of nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus of human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 01; 34(1):10-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  119. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy of postoperative continuous local anesthetic infusion at the iliac crest bone graft site after posterior spinal arthrodesis: a minimum of 4-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2790-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  120. The management of complex soft-tissue defects after spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan; 88(1):8-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  121. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the efficacy of postoperative continuous local anesthetic infusion at the iliac crest bone graft site after spinal arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 15; 30(22):2477-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  122. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis. Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec; 5(6):615-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  123. Open vertebral cement augmentation combined with lumbar decompression for the operative management of thoracolumbar stenosis secondary to osteoporotic burst fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Oct; 18(5):413-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  124. A prospective cohort analysis of adjacent vertebral body bone mineral density in lumbar surgery patients with or without instrumented posterolateral fusion: a 9- to 12-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 01; 30(15):1750-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  125. Early Opioid Consumption Patterns After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2022 02 01; 35(1):E121-E126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  126. Long structural allografts in the treatment of anterior spinal column defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Jan; (394):121-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  127. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Using PROMIS CAT in Cervical Spine Surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2019 11; 32(9):392-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  128. Predictive Factors of Postoperative Dysphagia in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 04 01; 44(7):E400-E407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  129. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Clostridium difficile Colitis After Spine Surgery: An Analysis of a National Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 06 15; 43(12):861-868.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  130. Longer Operative Time Is Associated With Increased Adverse Events After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: 15-Minute Intervals Matter. Orthopedics. 2018 Jul 01; 41(4):e483-e488.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  131. Severity Weighting of Postoperative Adverse Events in Orthopedic Surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jul/Aug; 46(4):E235-E243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  132. A Novel Groove-Entry Technique for Inserting Thoracic Percutaneous Pedicle Screws. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 03; 30(2):57-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  133. Differences in Short-Term Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15; 42(4):253-260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  134. Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan; 41(2):E101-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  135. Timing of Complications After Spinal Fusion Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 01; 40(19):1527-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  136. Mesenchymal stem cell allograft as a fusion adjunct in one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a matched cohort analysis. Spine J. 2016 Feb; 16(2):163-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  137. Patient perceptions of physician reimbursement for spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 01; 38(15):1288-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  138. Increased swelling complications associated with off-label usage of rhBMP-2 in the anterior cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15; 31(24):2813-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  139. Comparing outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in workman's versus non-workman's compensation population. Spine J. 2002 Nov-Dec; 2(6):408-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.