Header Logo

Connection

Aaron Rosenberg to Reoperation

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Aaron Rosenberg has written about Reoperation.
Connection Strength

0.950
  1. Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan; 85(1):41-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  2. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  3. Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar; 469(3):839-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  4. Augments and void fillers: metallica. Orthopedics. 2006 09; 29(9):850-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May; 446:59-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  6. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Dec; 86(12):2694-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  7. Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):113-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  8. Unicompartmental arthroplasty for isolated arthritis. Orthopedics. 2003 Sep; 26(9):959, 961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  9. Case challenges in knee surgery: what would you do? J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):55-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  10. Cementless acetabular components: the gold standard for socket revision. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):118-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  11. The patella in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A Suppl 1:S63-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  12. Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern? Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):51-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  13. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct; 34(10):2392-2397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  14. Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Randomized Trial of 400 vs 700 cGy. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1328-1334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  15. Repair of Intraoperative Injury to the Medial Collateral Ligament During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 06; 98(1):35-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  16. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 16; 93(22):e130(1-6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):62-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  19. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  21. Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91(2):350-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  22. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  23. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  24. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug; 87(8):1795-800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  25. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jun; (435):277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  26. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan; (430):117-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  27. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  28. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  29. Intraoperative assessment in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A Suppl 1:S26-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.