Header Logo

Connection

Robin Pourzal to Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robin Pourzal has written about Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip.
Connection Strength

4.101
  1. Has Wrought Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy Changed for the Worse Over Time? J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S280-S284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.497
  2. Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 09 01; 479(9):2083-2096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.445
  3. What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2707-2711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  4. Alloy Microstructure Dictates Corrosion Modes in THA Modular Junctions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec; 475(12):3026-3043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.338
  5. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.317
  6. How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug; 474(8):1867-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  7. Effect of Femoral Head Material, Surgeon Experience, and Assembly Technique on Simulated Head-Neck Total Hip Arthroplasty Impaction Forces. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb; 39(2):507-513.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  8. Hip implant modular junction: The role of CoCrMo alloy microstructure on fretting-corrosion. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 10; 134:105402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  9. Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy associated with elevated serum cobalt and accelerated wear of a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Jun 27; 15(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  10. Model validation for estimating taper microgroove deformation during total hip arthroplasty head-neck assembly. J Biomech. 2022 07; 140:111172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  11. Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head-stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 2023 02; 41(2):418-425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  12. Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  13. On the Formation Mechanism of Column Damage Within Modular Taper Junctions. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2603-2611.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  14. Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  15. What Surgeons Need to Know About Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S55-S59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  16. Wear particles induce a new macrophage phenotype with the potential to accelerate material corrosion within total hip replacement interfaces. Acta Biomater. 2020 01 01; 101:586-597.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  17. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging of wear and corrosion products within joint capsule tissue from total hip replacements patients. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020 02; 108(2):513-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  18. Metal wear particles in hematopoietic marrow of the axial skeleton in patients with prior revision for mechanical failure of a hip or knee arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 08; 107(6):1930-1936.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  19. Mechanical, chemical and biological damage modes within head-neck tapers of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V contemporary hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 07; 106(5):1672-1685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  20. Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions?Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total?Hip?Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S272-S277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  21. Nanoscale surface modification by anodic oxidation increased bone ingrowth and reduced fibrous tissue in the porous coating of titanium-alloy femoral hip arthroplasty implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 02; 105(2):283-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  22. Wear patterns of taper connections in retrieved large diameter metal-on-metal bearings. J Orthop Res. 2013 Jul; 31(7):1116-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  23. New insights into hard phases of CoCrMo metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Aug; 12:39-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  24. In vivo wear of a squeaky alumina-on-alumina hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 06; 93(7):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  25. Wear mechanisms in metal-on-metal bearings: the importance of tribochemical reaction layers. J Orthop Res. 2010 Apr; 28(4):436-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  26. Subsurface changes of a MoM hip implant below different contact zones. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009 Apr; 2(2):186-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  27. In Vitro Evidence for Cell-Accelerated Corrosion Within Modular Junctions of Total Hip Replacements. J Orthop Res. 2020 02; 38(2):393-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  28. Graphitic tribological layers in metal-on-metal hip replacements. Science. 2011 Dec 23; 334(6063):1687-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.