Wayne Paprosky to Radiography
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Wayne Paprosky has written about Radiography.
Connection Strength
1.827
-
Radiographic measurement of leg-length change in the nonoperative leg during total hip arthroplasty: a potential indicator of imaging error? Hip Int. 2023 Sep; 33(5):858-863.
Score: 0.185
-
Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity. Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):36-42.
Score: 0.105
-
Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Oct; 21(10):601-12.
Score: 0.097
-
CORR Insights?: Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul; 471(7):2266.
Score: 0.094
-
Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
Score: 0.093
-
Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401.
Score: 0.086
-
Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar; 469(3):839-46.
Score: 0.079
-
The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
Score: 0.066
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
Score: 0.066
-
The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):83-6.
Score: 0.059
-
Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):87-90.
Score: 0.059
-
Constrained liners in revision total hip arthroplasty: an overuse syndrome: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun; 21(4 Suppl 1):121-5.
Score: 0.058
-
The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:92-9.
Score: 0.057
-
The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec; 441:216-20.
Score: 0.056
-
Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):227-31.
Score: 0.053
-
The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):55-62.
Score: 0.050
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Dec; 85(12):2385-90.
Score: 0.049
-
Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A Suppl 4:1-6.
Score: 0.046
-
Porous coated femoral fixation: the long and short of it. Orthopedics. 2002 Sep; 25(9):941-3.
Score: 0.045
-
Preoperative recognition of acetabular defects: paths of reason. Orthopedics. 2000 Sep; 23(9):959-60.
Score: 0.039
-
Hip replacement: treatment of femoral bone loss using distal bypass fixation. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49:119-30.
Score: 0.037
-
Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec; (369):230-42.
Score: 0.037
-
5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997 Dec; 12(8):839-47.
Score: 0.032
-
Acetabular reconstruction with massive acetabular allografts. Instr Course Lect. 1996; 45:149-59.
Score: 0.028
-
Acetabular defect classification: a detailed radiographic approach. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995 Apr; 6(2):76-85.
Score: 0.027
-
Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec; 79(4):285-91.
Score: 0.026
-
Femoral reconstruction with massive allograft and cementless prosthesis. Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec; 79(4):313-8.
Score: 0.026
-
Acetabular reconstruction with massive allograft and cementless prosthesis. Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec; 79(4):379-86.
Score: 0.026
-
Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jan; (298):147-55.
Score: 0.025
-
Advances in acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: maximizing function and outcomes after treatment of periacetabular osteolysis around the well-fixed shell. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18; 95(18):1709-18.
Score: 0.024
-
Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
Score: 0.021
-
Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 May; 96(3):235-41.
Score: 0.019
-
Threaded cup acetabuloplasty. Early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Apr; (241):183-9.
Score: 0.018
-
How prevalent are implant wear and osteolysis, and how has the scope of osteolysis changed since 2000? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16 Suppl 1:S1-6.
Score: 0.016
-
Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):113-21.
Score: 0.012
-
Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Nov; 79(11):1628-34.
Score: 0.008