Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Shane Nho and Shane Nho.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
151.639
Shane Nho
  1. Clinical Outcomes After Open and Endoscopic Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tendon Tears at a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Nov; 11(11):23259671231209054.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.899
  2. A Smartphone App Shows Patients Return to Preoperative Gait Metrics 6 Weeks After Hip Arthroscopy, and Gait Metrics Have Low to Moderate Correlations With a Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct; 5(5):100779.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.885
  3. All-Endoscopic Modified Krackow Suture for Proximal Hamstring Repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Aug; 12(8):e1473-e1478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.880
  4. Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.875
  5. High-Level Competitive Athletes Who Undergo Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrate Durable 5-Year Outcomes and Lower Subjective Pain: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Sports Health. 2023 Jun 28; 19417381231183658.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.874
  6. Endoscopic Partial Proximal Hamstring Repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Jul; 12(7):e1075-e1081.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.872
  7. Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2023 07; 51(8):2141-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.870
  8. Patients Maintain Clinically Significant Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1869-1881.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.868
  9. Three-Grade Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Tear Classification System Provides Excellent Inter-Rater Reliability. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Jun; 5(3):e773-e782.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.867
  10. Capsular Repair Is Associated With Lower Revision Rates Yet Similar Clinical Outcomes and Arthroplasty Conversion 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1882-1891.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.865
  11. Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.864
  12. Hamstring Injuries: A Current Concepts Review: Evaluation, Nonoperative Treatment, and Surgical Decision Making. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Apr 24; 3635465231164931.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.864
  13. Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2023 11; 39(11):2293-2299.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.864
  14. Intraoperative Use of Ultrasound for Assessing Cam Deformity and Cam Resection. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May; 12(5):e729-e735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.863
  15. Spinopelvic Parameters Do Not Influence Outcomes Following Primary Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb; 5(1):e119-e127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.844
  16. Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Index Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predict Contralateral Surgery Results at 2 Years. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1175-1182.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.842
  17. Borderline Dysplastic Hips Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Achieve Equivalent Patient Reported Outcomes When Compared With Hips With Normal Acetabular Coverage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 15; 31(6):e336-e346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.836
  18. Ultrasound Demonstrates Potential in Identifying Proximal Femoral Morphology Before and After Cam Resection: A Cadaveric Study. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):751-757.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.835
  19. Editorial: Current concepts related to the understanding of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and advancements in perioperative arthroscopic management: An update. Front Surg. 2022; 9:1004975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.828
  20. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.821
  21. Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2606-2612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.819
  22. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):838-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.817
  23. Surgical Treatment of Gluteus Medius Tears. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2115-2117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.816
  24. Ultrasound Can Determine Joint Distraction During Hip Arthroscopy but Fluoroscopic-Guided Portal Placement Is Superior. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun; 4(3):e1083-e1089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.811
  25. Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(8):2155-2164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.810
  26. Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar; 50(3):746-756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.790
  27. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):2090-2105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.788
  28. Recurrence of Hamstring Injuries and Risk Factors for Partial and Complete Tears in the National Football League: An Analysis From 2009-2020. Phys Sportsmed. 2023 04; 51(2):139-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.787
  29. Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Surgery: Predictors and Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov; 9(11):23259671211038933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.784
  30. Return to Sport in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2022 01; 50(1):30-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.783
  31. Assessment of Femoral Torsion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging is More Reliable Using Axial-Oblique Sequences Compared With Standard Axial Slices in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):1857-1866.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.783
  32. Quantification of Acetabular Coverage on 3-Dimensional Reconstructed Computed Tomography Scan Bone Models in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Descriptive Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov; 9(11):23259671211049457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.782
  33. Iliopsoas Bursitis Managed with Endoscopic Bursectomy and Lesser Trochanter Decompression: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021 11 11; 11(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.781
  34. Author Reply to "Regarding 'Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique'". Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3225-3226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.780
  35. Patients With a High Femoroepiphyseal Roof With Concomitant Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Do Not Demonstrate Inferior Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2022 05; 38(5):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.779
  36. Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct; 9(10):23259671211034588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.776
  37. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of Patients Undergoing Concomitant Labral Repair and Ligamentum Teres Debridement Versus Isolated Labral Repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep; 9(9):23259671211036469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.775
  38. Three-Dimensional Measures of Bony Resection During Femoral Osteochondroplasty Are Related to Alpha Angle Measures: A Cadaveric Study. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec; 3(6):e1857-e1863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.775
  39. Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Using Labral Reconstruction with Capsular Autograft. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Oct; 10(10):e2375-e2381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.774
  40. The Natural Course of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement According to the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and Hip Outcome Score Sports Subscale. Am J Sports Med. 2021 10; 49(12):3250-3260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.772
  41. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec; 3(6):e1645-e1650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.770
  42. Intraoperative Automated Radiographic Visualization Tool Allows for Higher Accuracy of Cam Lesion Resection When Used by Novice Surgeons for Arthroscopic Femoroplasty: Lowering the Learning Curve. Arthroscopy. 2022 04; 38(4):1156-1163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.770
  43. Collection of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Using a Smartphone Application Format Is Faster and Preferred When Compared With the Paper Version: A?Pilot Study of rHip. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1401-e1405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.769
  44. Patients Require Less Time to Complete Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Than Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1413-e1419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.768
  45. Multicenter Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of 2-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair Versus Labral Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021 09; 49(11):2968-2976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.766
  46. Hip Capsular Plication With Crossed Mattress Stitch Configuration for a Revision Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Capsular Insufficiency. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Aug; 10(8):e1955-e1960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.763
  47. MRI-- and CT--based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2022 05; 40(5):1174-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.763
  48. Superior Gluteal Reconstruction Results in Promising Outcomes for Massive Abductor Tendon Tears. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1321-e1327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.763
  49. High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.761
  50. Association Between Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion and Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2466-2474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.761
  51. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.760
  52. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.758
  53. Use of Younger Patient Age and Greater Anterior Center-Edge Angle to Predict the Need for Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement-Related Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(8):2110-2116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.758
  54. Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.757
  55. Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia Affect Return to Sport in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug; 3(4):e1087-e1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.757
  56. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Prolonged Opioid Use in Opioid-Na?ve Primary Hip Arthroscopy Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 05 25; 5(5):e21.00093-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.756
  57. Arthroscopic Anchor-Based Hip Capsular Reconstruction Without Graft Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jun; 10(6):e1511-e1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.755
  58. Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jun; 10(6):e1491-e1496.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.754
  59. The Effect of Rim Preparation, Labral Augmentation, and Labral Reconstruction on the Suction Seal of the Hip. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):365-373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.754
  60. Intraoperative Computer Vision Integrated Interactive Fluoroscopy Correlates With Successful Femoroplasty on Clinic-Based Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3371-3382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.753
  61. Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.753
  62. Hypermobile Disorders and Their Effects on the Hip Joint. Front Surg. 2021; 8:596971.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.748
  63. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.745
  64. Surgical Treatment of Labral Tears: Debridement, Repair, and Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):e1-e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.744
  65. Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Dislocation After Previous Hip Arthroscopy: Capsular Reconstruction With Labral Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Mar; 10(3):e867-e872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.743
  66. Hip Instability in the Athlete: Anatomy, Etiology, and Management. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):289-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.742
  67. Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):713-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.741
  68. Pelvic osteotomies for acetabular dysplasia: Are there outcomes, survivorship and complication differences between different osteotomy techniques? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Dec; 7(4):764-776.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.741
  69. High Rate of Full Duty Return to Work After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Workers Who Are Not on Workers' Compensation. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):729-736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.741
  70. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.740
  71. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.738
  72. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.735
  73. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1143-1151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.735
  74. Endoscopic Approach to Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Repair. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Oct-Dec; 10(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.735
  75. Author Reply to "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum'". Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2947-2948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.732
  76. Standardizing Muscle Strength Measurement in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Response. Sports Health. 2021 Jul-Aug; 13(4):404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.731
  77. Physical Examination of the Hip. Sports Health. 2021 Mar; 13(2):149-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.730
  78. Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.729
  79. Surgical Treatment of Subchondral Bone Cysts of the Acetabulum With Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Material in Patients Without Advanced Arthritic Hips. Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Sep; 9(9):e1375-e1379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.723
  80. Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Being Lost to Follow-up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct; 2(5):e591-e598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.722
  81. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 08; 48(10):NP45-NP46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.715
  82. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.713
  83. Cartilage-Preserving Arthroscopic-Assisted Radiofrequency Ablation of Periacetabular Osteoid Osteoma in a Young Adult Hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1039-e1042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.711
  84. Approach to the Patient With Failed Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 01; 28(13):538-545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.711
  85. Editorial Commentary: Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: What We Know Now and Where Do We Go From Here? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1862-1863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.711
  86. Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2433-2442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.707
  87. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.707
  88. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.704
  89. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.704
  90. Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes in Hip Preservation Surgery: A Case for Centers of Excellence. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar; 8(3):2325967120908821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.697
  91. Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):901-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.695
  92. Squat and gait biomechanics 6 months following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jan; 7(1):27-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.693
  93. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.692
  94. Case (and capsule) closed! Can we really claim that capsular repair may not influence outcomes after hip arthroscopy? Hip Int. 2020 05; 30(3):363-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.691
  95. Evaluation of Statistical Shape Modeling in Quantifying Femoral Morphologic Differences Between Symptomatic and Nonsymptomatic Hips in Patients with Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e91-e95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.691
  96. Assessment of Hip Translation In?Vivo in Patients With Femoracetabular Impingement Syndrome Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e113-e120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.688
  97. Timing of Surgery: Can It Predict Outcome? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):NP11-NP12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.687
  98. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.687
  99. Editorial Commentary: Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroscopy-Bear in Mind the Bearing of Weight. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):165-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.687
  100. The Role of Comprehensive Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):9-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.687
  101. Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.687
  102. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.686
  103. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.685
  104. Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3240-3247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.683
  105. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.683
  106. A T-capsulotomy provides increased hip joint visualization compared with an extended interportal capsulotomy: commentary response. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Aug; 6(3):290-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.682
  107. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.680
  108. Arthroscopic Femoral Osteochondroplasty With Capsular Plication for Osteochondroma of the Femoral Neck. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Nov; 8(11):e1353-e1359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.678
  109. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.677
  110. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.676
  111. Superior Gluteal Reconstruction for Severe Hip Abductor Deficiency. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Oct; 8(10):e1255-e1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.674
  112. Radiographic Prevalence of Sacroiliac Joint Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2598-2605.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.671
  113. Contemporary Hip Capsular Management and Closure Using a Suture Passing Device. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Sep; 8(9):e947-e952.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.670
  114. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.669
  115. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.669
  116. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.667
  117. Surface Mapping of the Musculotendinous Attachments at the Pubic Symphysis in Cadaveric Specimens: Implications for the Treatment of Core Muscle Injury. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2358-2364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.667
  118. Preoperative Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul; 7(7):2325967119860079.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.667
  119. Effect of prior ipsilateral lower extremity surgery on 2-year outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Aug; 6(3):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.665
  120. Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.665
  121. Contemporary Management of the Hip Capsule During Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jul 05; 260-270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.664
  122. A T-capsulotomy provides increased hip joint visualization compared with an extended interportal capsulotomy. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jul; 6(2):157-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.660
  123. Endoscopic Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tear With Double-Row Suture Bridge Construct. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Jul; 8(7):e675-e678.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.660
  124. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  125. Editorial Commentary: If You Can't See It, You Can't Treat It: Proper Hip Radiographic Views Are Critical. Arthroscopy. 2019 06; 35(6):1807-1808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  126. Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.652
  127. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.652
  128. Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Have Asymmetrical Hip Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Compensatory Muscle Changes Associated With Preoperative Pain?Level. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1445-1453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.651
  129. Is there a correlation between outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and patient cortical bone thickness? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jan; 6(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.650
  130. Comparable patient-reported outcomes in females with or without joint hypermobility after hip arthroscopy and capsular plication for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jan; 6(1):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.650
  131. Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.649
  132. Assessment of Association Between Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Outcomes Following Gluteus Medius Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1092-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.649
  133. Reconstruction Guide for the Measurement of Segmental Labral Insufficiency: An Alternative Technique for Acetabular Labral Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Mar; 8(3):e223-e229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.645
  134. Systematic Review of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Importance of Labral Repair and Capsular Closure. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):646-656.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.644
  135. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Sleep Quality Postoperatively. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):461-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.641
  136. Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.637
  137. Predictors of 5-Year Citation Rate in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Literature. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):206-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.636
  138. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement on the iHOT-12? HSS J. 2019 Jul; 15(2):103-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.635
  139. Vertical Extension of the T-Capsulotomy Incision in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Does Not Affect the Force Required for Hip Distraction: Effect of Capsulotomy Size, Type, and Subsequent Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2018 11; 46(13):3127-3133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.631
  140. Return to Golf After Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3187-3193.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.630
  141. Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.630
  142. Editorial Commentary: Smarter Than a Sixth Grader? Hip Arthroscopists, Check Your Training at the Door. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2150-2151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.619
  143. Antegrade Femoral Nail Distal Interlocking Screw Causing Rupture of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Patellar Instability. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jul; 47(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.619
  144. Self-reported Mental Disorders Negatively Influence Surgical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May; 6(5):2325967118773312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.614
  145. Editorial Commentary: What Irks a Hip Arthroscopist? Intraoperative Anchor Failure. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1217-1218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.608
  146. Editorial Commentary: Is Vitamin D the New Wheaties? Preventing Muscle Fatigue Could Keep Athletes in the Game. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1286-1287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.608
  147. Anatomy of the Pudendal Nerve and Other Neural Structures Around the Proximal Hamstring Origin in Males. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2105-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.608
  148. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix at the Time of Gluteus Medius Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):832-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.597
  149. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.593
  150. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov; 45(13):3044-3051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.583
  151. Editorial: Hip Arthroscopy. Front Surg. 2017; 4:29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.574
  152. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Capsular Plication for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug; 45(10):2303-2311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.572
  153. A Critical Review: Management and Surgical Options for Articular Defects in the Hip. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 36(3):573-586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.570
  154. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.570
  155. Hip Arthroscopy for Atypical Posterior Hip Pain: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun; 45(7):1627-1632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.566
  156. Current Techniques in Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: Capsular Repair and Plication. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):49-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.558
  157. Amateur and Recreational Athletes Return to Sport at a High Rate Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):748-755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.558
  158. The Effect of Capsulotomy and Capsular Repair on Hip Distraction: A Cadaveric Investigation. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):559-565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.557
  159. Femoroacetabular Impingement and Pelvic Incidence: Radiographic Comparison to an Asymptomatic Control. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):545-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.555
  160. Ability to return to work without restrictions in workers compensation patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):30-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.551
  161. High Rate of Return to Running for Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 45(1):127-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.548
  162. Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Arthroscopy. 2016 09; 32(9):1877-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.537
  163. Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.534
  164. Capsulotomy Size Affects Hip Joint Kinematic Stability. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1571-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.534
  165. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Endoscopic Repair of Partial Articular Gluteus Tendon Avulsion. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Jun; 5(3):e425-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.533
  166. Hip Arthroscopy Surgical Volume Trends and 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.530
  167. Imaging in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comprehensive Approach. Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul; 35(3):331-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.530
  168. Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy: An Anatomic, Biomechanical, and Technical Review. Front Surg. 2016; 3:13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.527
  169. Vibratory sense deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016 03; 16(1):40-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.526
  170. All-Endoscopic Single-Row Repair of Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Feb; 5(1):e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.521
  171. Prevalence of Cam Morphology in Females with Femoroacetabular Impingement. Front Surg. 2015; 2:61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.517
  172. Techniques and Results for Open Hip Preservation. Front Surg. 2015; 2:64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.517
  173. Complications in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Strategies for Prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec; 23(4):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.517
  174. Perineal Post Padding Technique to Improve Hip Distraction in Tall Patients. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Dec; 4(6):e747-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.517
  175. Capsular Plication for Treatment of Iatrogenic Hip Instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Dec; 4(6):e625-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.514
  176. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.514
  177. Fifty Most Cited Articles for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy. Front Surg. 2015; 2:41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.507
  178. Blastomyces Tenosynovitis of the Foot and Ankle: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec; 54(6):1183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  179. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  180. Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  181. Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs Rotator Cuff Classification to the Evaluation of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears and the Clinical Correlation With Outcome After Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov; 31(11):2145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  182. Impact of Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology on Gait Assessment in Symptomatic Patients. Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct; 7(5):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  183. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.501
  184. Rehabilitation Following Hip Arthroscopy - A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2015; 2:21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  185. Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.495
  186. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.490
  187. Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1199-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.488
  188. Arthroscopic technique for the treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Feb; 4(1):e41-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.488
  189. Endoscopic Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of the Hip. JBJS Rev. 2014 Dec 09; 2(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.483
  190. Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):98-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  191. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.475
  192. Identification and treatment of existing copathology in anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan; 31(1):154-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.475
  193. Operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep; 42(3):112-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  194. The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.472
  195. Arthroscopic Acetabular Microfracture With the Use of?Flexible Drills: A Technique Guide. Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Aug; 3(4):e459-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  196. Evaluating the quality of Internet information for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2014 Oct; 30(10):1372-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  197. Evaluation of hip pain in young adults. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 May; 42(2):38-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  198. Arthroscopic-assisted core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Feb; 3(1):e7-e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.450
  199. Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.445
  200. Isolated vastus lateralis tendon avulsion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Oct; 42(10):464-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.445
  201. Operative treatment of FAI: open hip preservation surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Sep; 6(3):258-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  202. Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Sep; 6(3):207-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  203. Lymphoma as a Mimicker of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2013 Aug 28; 3(3 Suppl 5):e86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  204. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  205. Evidence of capsular defect following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr; 22(4):902-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.439
  206. Age-related differences in radiographic parameters for femoroacetabular impingement in hip arthroplasty patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  207. Routine complete capsular closure during hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2013 May; 2(2):e89-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.429
  208. Endoscopic repair of a gluteus medius tear at the musculotendinous junction. Arthrosc Tech. 2013 May; 2(2):e69-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  209. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  210. Hip pain in active patients: what you may be missing. J Fam Pract. 2012 Dec; 61(12):736-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  211. Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):358-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.418
  212. The use of double-loaded suture anchors for labral repair and capsular repair during hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2012 Dec; 1(2):e213-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.418
  213. Hip osseous morphology using computer navigation and plain radiographs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Nov; 41(11):519-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.418
  214. Operative treatment of chondral defects in the hip joint: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012 Sep; 5(3):244-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.413
  215. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for complete gluteus medius tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.407
  216. Improved arthroscopic visualization of peripheral compartment. Arthrosc Tech. 2012 Sep; 1(1):e57-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  217. Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Nov; 18(11):645-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.364
  218. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears combined with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec; 26(12):1667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.359
  219. Incidence of early development of radiolucent lines in keeled polyethylene glenoid components after total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  220. A biomechanical analysis of shoulder stabilization: posteroinferior glenohumeral capsular plication. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1413-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  221. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):764-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  222. Posterior hip pain in an athletic population: differential diagnosis and treatment options. Sports Health. 2010 May; 2(3):237-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  223. Hip Microfracture: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes. Cartilage. 2010 Apr; 1(2):127-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  224. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 2010 Apr; 29(2):267-82, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  225. A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1405-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  226. Biomechanical and biologic augmentation for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar; 38(3):619-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.337
  227. Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov; 25(11):1319-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  228. Arthroscopic repair of L-shaped tear of the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex in a pediatric patient: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Dec; 17(12):1454-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  229. Observations on retrieved glenoid components from total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18(3):371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  230. Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jul; 25(7):788-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  231. Comparison of conforming and nonconforming retrieved glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec; 17(6):914-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.314
  232. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation of patellar resurfacing with press-fit osteochondral autograft plugs. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  233. Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan; 23(1):94-102, 102.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.279
  234. Comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying in a rabbit rotator cuff repair model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct; 15(5):630-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  235. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  236. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis Identifies Use of Consumables and Operating Room Time as Factors Associated With Increased Cost of Outpatient Primary Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2023 Nov 17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  237. Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2023 11; 51(13):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  238. A guide to appropriately planning and conducting meta-analyses: part 3. Special considerations-the network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul; 31(7):2544-2549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  239. Effects of Opioid-Limiting Legislation and Increased Provider Awareness on Postoperative Opioid Use and Complications After Hip Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 May; 11(5):23259671231162340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  240. Noninvasive shape-fitting method quantifies cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Implications for diagnosis and surgical planning. J Orthop Res. 2023 06; 41(6):1256-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  241. External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2022 11; 50(13):3593-3599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  242. Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  243. Increased Readmission Rates but No Difference in Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip Arthroscopy: A Large Matched-Cohort Insurance Database Analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun; 4(3):e975-e988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  244. Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May; 10(5):23259671221095417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  245. Criteria for the Operating Room Confirmation of the Diagnosis of Hip Instability: The Results of an International Expert Consensus Conference. Arthroscopy. 2022 10; 38(10):2837-2849.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  246. Revision Hip Arthroscopy for Graft Retear and Residual Cam Lesion in a Previously Labral Reconstructed Hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Feb; 11(2):e139-e145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  247. Capsular Management with Traction-Assisted T-Capsulotomy Technique During Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Oct; 10(10):e2271-e2278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  248. The safe zones for endoscopic proximal hamstring repair: a cadaveric assessment of standard portal placement and their relationship to major neurovascular structures. Hip Int. 2023 May; 33(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  249. Top Ten Pearls for Successful Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Aug; 10(8):e2033-e2042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  250. Remplissage and Labral Reconstruction Technique Correlated With Dynamic Hip Examination Using the Kite Technique for Restoration of the Suction Seal in Revision Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Aug; 10(8):e1995-e2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  251. Effect of Capsular Closure After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Outcomes: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Comparative Studies. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun; 9(6):23259671211017467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  252. Hip Instability in Ballet Dancers: A Narrative Review. J Dance Med Sci. 2021 Sep 15; 25(3):176-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  253. Indications and Outcomes After Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Jun; 3(3):e939-e949.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  254. A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):325-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  255. Intraoperative Guidance for the Surgical Correction of Cam Deformities Using Hip Arthroscopy Based on Alpha Angle Measurement. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 May; 10(5):e1351-e1360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  256. Capsular Management Techniques and Hip Arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):22-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  257. Tenotomy for Iliopsoas Pathology is Infrequently Performed and Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Hips Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2140-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  258. Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Feb; 9(2):2325967120981983.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  259. Proximal Hamstring Injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):339-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  260. Large Heterogeneity Among Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reporting Trends and Quantification Methods. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):1028-1037.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  261. Author Reply to "Placebo Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery" and "Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials". Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2779-2784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  262. Preparation Methods and Clinical Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Intra-articular Hip Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct; 8(10):2325967120960414.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  263. Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1261-1270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  264. Is There a Role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct; 2(5):e655-e660.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  265. No Differences in Hip Joint Space Measurements Between Weightbearing or Supine Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2843-2848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  266. Risk of intra-articular hip injury in adolescent athletes: a five-year multicentre cohort study. Int Orthop. 2020 10; 44(10):1965-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  267. Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Analyses Show Similarities in Anterosuperior Acetabular Coverage Between Acetabular Dysplasia and Borderline Dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2623-2632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  268. Sham Surgery Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery May Just Be a Sham: A Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2750-2762.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  269. Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  270. Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  271. Adjunct Analgesia Reduces Pain and Opioid Consumption After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3638-3651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  272. Three-dimensional hip joint congruity evaluation of the borderline dysplasia: Zonal-acetabular radius of curvature. J Orthop Res. 2020 10; 38(10):2197-2205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  273. What Is the Predictive Ability and Academic Impact of the Altmetrics Score and Social Media Attention? Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1056-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  274. A tiered system using substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state scores to evaluate 2-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy with the Hip Outcome Score. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jan; 7(1):62-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  275. Regarding "Fascia Iliaca Blockade With the Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Perioperative Pain Management During Hip Arthroscopy: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial". Arthroscopy. 2020 02; 36(2):329-330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  276. Best Practice Guidelines for Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results of a Delphi Process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15; 28(2):81-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  277. Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1033-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  278. Reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jan; 7(1):77-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  279. Unplanned Admissions Following Hip Arthroscopy: Incidence and Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3271-3277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  280. Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  281. Indications and Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2175-2186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  282. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2064-2069.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  283. Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  284. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  285. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  286. The Impact of Depression on Patient Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov; 6(11):2325967118806490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  287. The dimensions of the hip capsule can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging and may have a role in arthroscopic planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr; 28(4):1246-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  288. Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy: Direct Comparison of Primary Acetabular Labral Repair and Primary Acetabular Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1748-1751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  289. Patient Perspectives of Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr; 6(4):2325967118766873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  290. Effects of Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1205-1213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  291. There Is a Significant Discrepancy Between "Big Data" Database and Original Research Publications on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1998-2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  292. Prevalence and Impact of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery on Future Participation in Elite American Football Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Feb; 6(2):2325967117752307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  293. Prospective, Observational Study of Opioid Use After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1488-1497.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  294. Advanced Imaging Adds Little Value in the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20; 99(24):e133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  295. Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  296. Hip Dysplasia: Prevalence, Associated Findings, and Procedures From Large Multicenter Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 02; 34(2):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  297. Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1998-2005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  298. Prevalence of Surgical Repair for Athletic Pubalgia and Impact on Performance in Football Athletes Participating in the National Football League Combine. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1044-1049.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  299. Rotational alignment of the knee is different in osteological specimens with and without a large cam deformity of the proximal femur. Hip Int. 2017 Jul 25; 27(4):401-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  300. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  301. Acetabular rim length: an anatomical study to determine reasonable graft sizes for labral reconstruction. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):106-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  302. Arthroscopic hip preservation surgery practice patterns: an international survey. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):18-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  303. Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct; 44(10):2505-2517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  304. Hip Dislocation or Subluxation After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1428-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  305. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  306. Capsular Suspension Technique for Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Aug; 4(4):e317-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  307. International trends in arthroscopic hip preservation surgery-are we treating the same patient? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jan; 2(1):28-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  308. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  309. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct; 19(7):1003-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  310. Proximal humerus fracture after keyhole biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):E61-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  311. Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  312. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Jun; 18(2):113-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  313. Biomechanical similarities among subscapularis repairs after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  314. Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid. Arthroscopy. 2010 Apr; 26(4):555-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  315. Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar; 26(3):393-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  316. Radiographic and histopathologic analysis of osteolysis after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun; 19(4):588-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  317. Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug; 25(8):909-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  318. Comparison of early and delayed failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Jun; 75(3):297-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  319. Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch through the subacromial space. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr; 25(4):439-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  320. Shoulder pain in the overhead throwing athlete. Sports Health. 2009 Mar; 1(2):108-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  321. Outcomes of mechanical debridement and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chondral defects: a prospective randomized study. J Knee Surg. 2008 Apr; 21(2):116-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  322. Prospective evaluation of allograft meniscus transplantation: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jun; 34(6):919-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  323. Postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan; 17(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  324. Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep; 19(7):794-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  325. Thermal chondroplasty with bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency energy: effect of treatment time on chondrocyte death and surface contouring. Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep; 18(7):779-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.