Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Shane Nho and Shane Nho.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
171.030
Shane Nho
  1. Clinical Outcomes After Open and Endoscopic Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tendon Tears at a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Nov; 11(11):23259671231209054.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.896
  2. A Smartphone App Shows Patients Return to Preoperative Gait Metrics 6 Weeks After Hip Arthroscopy, and Gait Metrics Have Low to Moderate Correlations With a Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct; 5(5):100779.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.881
  3. Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrate Comparable Survivability and Improvement but Worse Postoperative Outcomes Compared to Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Propensity Matched Study at Five-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2023 Aug 09.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.878
  4. All-Endoscopic Modified Krackow Suture for Proximal Hamstring Repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Aug; 12(8):e1473-e1478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.876
  5. Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.871
  6. High-Level Competitive Athletes Who Undergo Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrate Durable 5-Year Outcomes and Lower Subjective Pain: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Sports Health. 2023 Jun 28; 19417381231183658.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.871
  7. Endoscopic Partial Proximal Hamstring Repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Jul; 12(7):e1075-e1081.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.868
  8. Hamstring Strains: Classification and Management. Sports Health. 2023 Jun 06; 19417381231175880.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.867
  9. Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2023 07; 51(8):2141-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.867
  10. The Gluteus-Score-7 Predicts the Likelihood of Both Clinical Success and Failure Following Surgical Repair of the Hip Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus. Arthroscopy. 2023 May 18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.864
  11. Patients Maintain Clinically Significant Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1869-1881.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.864
  12. Three-Grade Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Tear Classification System Provides Excellent Inter-Rater Reliability. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Jun; 5(3):e773-e782.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.863
  13. Capsular Repair Is Associated With Lower Revision Rates Yet Similar Clinical Outcomes and Arthroplasty Conversion 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1882-1891.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.862
  14. Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.861
  15. Hamstring Injuries: A Current Concepts Review: Evaluation, Nonoperative Treatment, and Surgical Decision Making. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Apr 24; 3635465231164931.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.860
  16. Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2023 11; 39(11):2293-2299.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.860
  17. Intraoperative Use of Ultrasound for Assessing Cam Deformity and Cam Resection. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May; 12(5):e729-e735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.859
  18. Spinopelvic Parameters Do Not Influence Outcomes Following Primary Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb; 5(1):e119-e127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.841
  19. Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Index Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predict Contralateral Surgery Results at 2 Years. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1175-1182.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.838
  20. Borderline Dysplastic Hips Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Achieve Equivalent Patient Reported Outcomes When Compared With Hips With Normal Acetabular Coverage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 15; 31(6):e336-e346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.832
  21. Ultrasound Demonstrates Potential in Identifying Proximal Femoral Morphology Before and After Cam Resection: A Cadaveric Study. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):751-757.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.832
  22. Editorial: Current concepts related to the understanding of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and advancements in perioperative arthroscopic management: An update. Front Surg. 2022; 9:1004975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.825
  23. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.818
  24. Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Hips With Mild Osteoarthritis (T?nnis Grade 1): A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2598-2605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.816
  25. Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2606-2612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.816
  26. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):838-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.814
  27. Surgical Treatment of Gluteus Medius Tears. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2115-2117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.813
  28. Ultrasound Can Determine Joint Distraction During Hip Arthroscopy but Fluoroscopic-Guided Portal Placement Is Superior. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun; 4(3):e1083-e1089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.807
  29. Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(8):2155-2164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.807
  30. Presence of a Posterior Wall Sign in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2022 08; 37(8):1520-1525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.800
  31. Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar; 50(3):746-756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.787
  32. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):2090-2105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.785
  33. Recurrence of Hamstring Injuries and Risk Factors for Partial and Complete Tears in the National Football League: An Analysis From 2009-2020. Phys Sportsmed. 2023 04; 51(2):139-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.784
  34. Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Surgery: Predictors and Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov; 9(11):23259671211038933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.781
  35. Return to Sport in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2022 01; 50(1):30-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.780
  36. Assessment of Femoral Torsion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging is More Reliable Using Axial-Oblique Sequences Compared With Standard Axial Slices in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):1857-1866.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.780
  37. Quantification of Acetabular Coverage on 3-Dimensional Reconstructed Computed Tomography Scan Bone Models in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Descriptive Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov; 9(11):23259671211049457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.779
  38. Iliopsoas Bursitis Managed with Endoscopic Bursectomy and Lesser Trochanter Decompression: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021 11 11; 11(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.778
  39. Author Reply to "Regarding 'Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique'". Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3225-3226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.777
  40. Patients With a High Femoroepiphyseal Roof With Concomitant Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Do Not Demonstrate Inferior Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2022 05; 38(5):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.776
  41. Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct; 9(10):23259671211034588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.773
  42. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of Patients Undergoing Concomitant Labral Repair and Ligamentum Teres Debridement Versus Isolated Labral Repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep; 9(9):23259671211036469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.771
  43. Three-Dimensional Measures of Bony Resection During Femoral Osteochondroplasty Are Related to Alpha Angle Measures: A Cadaveric Study. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec; 3(6):e1857-e1863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.771
  44. Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Using Labral Reconstruction with Capsular Autograft. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Oct; 10(10):e2375-e2381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.771
  45. The Natural Course of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement According to the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and Hip Outcome Score Sports Subscale. Am J Sports Med. 2021 10; 49(12):3250-3260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.769
  46. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec; 3(6):e1645-e1650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.767
  47. Intraoperative Automated Radiographic Visualization Tool Allows for Higher Accuracy of Cam Lesion Resection When Used by Novice Surgeons for Arthroscopic Femoroplasty: Lowering the Learning Curve. Arthroscopy. 2022 04; 38(4):1156-1163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.767
  48. Collection of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Using a Smartphone Application Format Is Faster and Preferred When Compared With the Paper Version: A?Pilot Study of rHip. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1401-e1405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.766
  49. Patients Require Less Time to Complete Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Than Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1413-e1419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.765
  50. Multicenter Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of 2-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair Versus Labral Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021 09; 49(11):2968-2976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.763
  51. Hip Capsular Plication With Crossed Mattress Stitch Configuration for a Revision Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Capsular Insufficiency. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Aug; 10(8):e1955-e1960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.760
  52. MRI-- and CT--based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2022 05; 40(5):1174-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.760
  53. Superior Gluteal Reconstruction Results in Promising Outcomes for Massive Abductor Tendon Tears. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct; 3(5):e1321-e1327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.760
  54. Editorial Commentary: Hip Joint Venting Prior to Initiating Traction Reduces Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2171-2172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.759
  55. High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.758
  56. Association Between Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion and Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2466-2474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.758
  57. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.757
  58. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.755
  59. Use of Younger Patient Age and Greater Anterior Center-Edge Angle to Predict the Need for Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement-Related Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(8):2110-2116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.755
  60. Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.754
  61. Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia Affect Return to Sport in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug; 3(4):e1087-e1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.754
  62. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Prolonged Opioid Use in Opioid-Na?ve Primary Hip Arthroscopy Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 05 25; 5(5):e21.00093-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.753
  63. Arthroscopic Anchor-Based Hip Capsular Reconstruction Without Graft Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jun; 10(6):e1511-e1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.752
  64. Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jun; 10(6):e1491-e1496.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.751
  65. The Effect of Rim Preparation, Labral Augmentation, and Labral Reconstruction on the Suction Seal of the Hip. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):365-373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.751
  66. Intraoperative Computer Vision Integrated Interactive Fluoroscopy Correlates With Successful Femoroplasty on Clinic-Based Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3371-3382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.750
  67. Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.750
  68. Hypermobile Disorders and Their Effects on the Hip Joint. Front Surg. 2021; 8:596971.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.745
  69. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.742
  70. Surgical Treatment of Labral Tears: Debridement, Repair, and Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):e1-e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.741
  71. Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Dislocation After Previous Hip Arthroscopy: Capsular Reconstruction With Labral Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Mar; 10(3):e867-e872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.740
  72. Hip Instability in the Athlete: Anatomy, Etiology, and Management. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):289-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.739
  73. Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):713-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.739
  74. Pelvic osteotomies for acetabular dysplasia: Are there outcomes, survivorship and complication differences between different osteotomy techniques? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Dec; 7(4):764-776.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.738
  75. High Rate of Full Duty Return to Work After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Workers Who Are Not on Workers' Compensation. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):729-736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.738
  76. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.737
  77. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.735
  78. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.732
  79. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1143-1151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.732
  80. Endoscopic Approach to Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Repair. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Oct-Dec; 10(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.732
  81. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Five-Year Results in 140 Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021 01; 49(1):90-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.729
  82. Author Reply to "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum'". Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2947-2948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.729
  83. Standardizing Muscle Strength Measurement in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Response. Sports Health. 2021 Jul-Aug; 13(4):404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.728
  84. Physical Examination of the Hip. Sports Health. 2021 Mar; 13(2):149-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.727
  85. Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.726
  86. Surgical Treatment of Subchondral Bone Cysts of the Acetabulum With Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Material in Patients Without Advanced Arthritic Hips. Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Sep; 9(9):e1375-e1379.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.720
  87. Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Being Lost to Follow-up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct; 2(5):e591-e598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.719
  88. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 08; 48(10):NP45-NP46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.712
  89. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.710
  90. Cartilage-Preserving Arthroscopic-Assisted Radiofrequency Ablation of Periacetabular Osteoid Osteoma in a Young Adult Hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1039-e1042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.708
  91. Regarding "Routine Interportal Capsular Repair Does Not Lead to Superior Clinical Outcome Following Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Correction With Labral Repair". Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1788-1789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.708
  92. Editorial Commentary: Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: What We Know Now and Where Do We Go From Here? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1862-1863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.708
  93. Approach to the Patient With Failed Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 01; 28(13):538-545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.708
  94. Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2433-2442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.704
  95. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.704
  96. Return to Sport After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery and Sport-Specific Considerations: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Jun; 13(3):213-219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.704
  97. A Cadaveric Study of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: Biomechanical Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Cam Morphology, Partial Femoral Osteoplasty, and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2425-2432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  98. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.702
  99. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.701
  100. Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes in Hip Preservation Surgery: A Case for Centers of Excellence. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar; 8(3):2325967120908821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.694
  101. Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):901-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.692
  102. Squat and gait biomechanics 6 months following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jan; 7(1):27-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.690
  103. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.690
  104. Case (and capsule) closed! Can we really claim that capsular repair may not influence outcomes after hip arthroscopy? Hip Int. 2020 05; 30(3):363-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.689
  105. Evaluation of Statistical Shape Modeling in Quantifying Femoral Morphologic Differences Between Symptomatic and Nonsymptomatic Hips in Patients with Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e91-e95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.688
  106. 1.5?T magnetic resonance imaging generates accurate 3D proximal femoral models: Surgical planning implications for femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2020 09; 38(9):2050-2056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.688
  107. Assessment of Hip Translation In?Vivo in Patients With Femoracetabular Impingement Syndrome Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e113-e120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.685
  108. What is the Role of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing in Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr; 2(2):e97-e104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.685
  109. Timing of Surgery: Can It Predict Outcome? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):NP11-NP12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  110. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  111. Editorial Commentary: Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroscopy-Bear in Mind the Bearing of Weight. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):165-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  112. The Role of Comprehensive Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):9-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  113. Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  114. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.683
  115. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.683
  116. Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3240-3247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.680
  117. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.680
  118. A T-capsulotomy provides increased hip joint visualization compared with an extended interportal capsulotomy: commentary response. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Aug; 6(3):290-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.679
  119. Comparing Outcomes of Competitive Athletes Versus Nonathletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):159-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.678
  120. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.678
  121. Arthroscopic Femoral Osteochondroplasty With Capsular Plication for Osteochondroma of the Femoral Neck. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Nov; 8(11):e1353-e1359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.675
  122. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.674
  123. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.673
  124. Superior Gluteal Reconstruction for Severe Hip Abductor Deficiency. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Oct; 8(10):e1255-e1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.671
  125. Radiographic Prevalence of Sacroiliac Joint Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2598-2605.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.668
  126. Contemporary Hip Capsular Management and Closure Using a Suture Passing Device. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Sep; 8(9):e947-e952.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.667
  127. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.666
  128. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.666
  129. Mirror Image Modeling of Acetabular Rim Thickness Differences in Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov; 1(1):e1-e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.665
  130. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.665
  131. Surface Mapping of the Musculotendinous Attachments at the Pubic Symphysis in Cadaveric Specimens: Implications for the Treatment of Core Muscle Injury. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2358-2364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.664
  132. Preoperative Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul; 7(7):2325967119860079.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.664
  133. Effect of prior ipsilateral lower extremity surgery on 2-year outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Aug; 6(3):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.663
  134. Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.662
  135. Contemporary Management of the Hip Capsule During Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jul 05; 260-270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.661
  136. A T-capsulotomy provides increased hip joint visualization compared with an extended interportal capsulotomy. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jul; 6(2):157-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.658
  137. Endoscopic Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tear With Double-Row Suture Bridge Construct. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Jul; 8(7):e675-e678.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.657
  138. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.657
  139. Editorial Commentary: If You Can't See It, You Can't Treat It: Proper Hip Radiographic Views Are Critical. Arthroscopy. 2019 06; 35(6):1807-1808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.657
  140. Radiographic Prevalence of Symphysis Pubis Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 05; 47(6):1467-1472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.651
  141. Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.649
  142. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.649
  143. Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Have Asymmetrical Hip Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Compensatory Muscle Changes Associated With Preoperative Pain?Level. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1445-1453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.648
  144. Do Female Athletes Return to Sports After Hip Preservation Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome?: A Comparative Analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar; 7(3):2325967119831758.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.648
  145. Is there a correlation between outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and patient cortical bone thickness? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jan; 6(1):16-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.647
  146. Comparable patient-reported outcomes in females with or without joint hypermobility after hip arthroscopy and capsular plication for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Jan; 6(1):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.647
  147. Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.646
  148. Assessment of Association Between Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Outcomes Following Gluteus Medius Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1092-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.646
  149. Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum 2 Years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):552-559.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.645
  150. Reconstruction Guide for the Measurement of Segmental Labral Insufficiency: An Alternative Technique for Acetabular Labral Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Mar; 8(3):e223-e229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.642
  151. Systematic Review of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Importance of Labral Repair and Capsular Closure. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):646-656.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.642
  152. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Sleep Quality Postoperatively. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):461-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.639
  153. Intra-articular Volume Reduction With Arthroscopic Plication for Capsular Laxity of the Hip: A Cadaveric Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):471-477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.639
  154. Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.634
  155. Predictors of 5-Year Citation Rate in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Literature. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):206-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.634
  156. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement on the iHOT-12? HSS J. 2019 Jul; 15(2):103-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.632
  157. Risk Factors for Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Requiring Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Nov; 2(11):e070.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.631
  158. The Influence of Pain in Other Major Joints and the Spine on 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3196-3201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.631
  159. Vertical Extension of the T-Capsulotomy Incision in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Does Not Affect the Force Required for Hip Distraction: Effect of Capsulotomy Size, Type, and Subsequent Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2018 11; 46(13):3127-3133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.628
  160. Return to Golf After Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3187-3193.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.628
  161. Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.627
  162. Editorial Commentary: Smarter Than a Sixth Grader? Hip Arthroscopists, Check Your Training at the Door. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2150-2151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.616
  163. Antegrade Femoral Nail Distal Interlocking Screw Causing Rupture of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Patellar Instability. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jul; 47(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.616
  164. The Importance of Comprehensive Cam Correction: Radiographic Parameters Are Predictive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2018 07; 46(9):2072-2078.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.615
  165. Self-reported Mental Disorders Negatively Influence Surgical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May; 6(5):2325967118773312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.611
  166. High Rate of Return to Swimming After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1471-1477.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.609
  167. Editorial Commentary: What Irks a Hip Arthroscopist? Intraoperative Anchor Failure. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1217-1218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.606
  168. Editorial Commentary: Is Vitamin D the New Wheaties? Preventing Muscle Fatigue Could Keep Athletes in the Game. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1286-1287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.606
  169. Anatomy of the Pudendal Nerve and Other Neural Structures Around the Proximal Hamstring Origin in Males. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2105-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.605
  170. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix at the Time of Gluteus Medius Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):832-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.595
  171. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.591
  172. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov; 45(13):3044-3051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.580
  173. Editorial: Hip Arthroscopy. Front Surg. 2017; 4:29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.572
  174. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Capsular Plication for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug; 45(10):2303-2311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.570
  175. A Critical Review: Management and Surgical Options for Articular Defects in the Hip. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 36(3):573-586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.568
  176. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.568
  177. Hip Arthroscopy for Atypical Posterior Hip Pain: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun; 45(7):1627-1632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.563
  178. Current Techniques in Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: Capsular Repair and Plication. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):49-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.556
  179. Amateur and Recreational Athletes Return to Sport at a High Rate Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):748-755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.555
  180. The Effect of Capsulotomy and Capsular Repair on Hip Distraction: A Cadaveric Investigation. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):559-565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.555
  181. Femoroacetabular Impingement and Pelvic Incidence: Radiographic Comparison to an Asymptomatic Control. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):545-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  182. Ability to return to work without restrictions in workers compensation patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):30-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.549
  183. Does the Hip Capsule Remain Closed After Hip Arthroscopy With Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Symptomatic Postoperative Patients. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan; 33(1):108-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.546
  184. High Rate of Return to Running for Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 45(1):127-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.546
  185. Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Arthroscopy. 2016 09; 32(9):1877-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.535
  186. Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.532
  187. Capsulotomy Size Affects Hip Joint Kinematic Stability. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1571-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.532
  188. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Endoscopic Repair of Partial Articular Gluteus Tendon Avulsion. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Jun; 5(3):e425-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.530
  189. Imaging in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comprehensive Approach. Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul; 35(3):331-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.528
  190. Hip Arthroscopy Surgical Volume Trends and 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.528
  191. Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy: An Anatomic, Biomechanical, and Technical Review. Front Surg. 2016; 3:13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.525
  192. Vibratory sense deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016 03; 16(1):40-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.524
  193. All-Endoscopic Single-Row Repair of Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Feb; 5(1):e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.519
  194. Complications in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Strategies for Prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec; 23(4):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.515
  195. Prevalence of Cam Morphology in Females with Femoroacetabular Impingement. Front Surg. 2015; 2:61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.515
  196. Techniques and Results for Open Hip Preservation. Front Surg. 2015; 2:64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.515
  197. Perineal Post Padding Technique to Improve Hip Distraction in Tall Patients. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Dec; 4(6):e747-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.514
  198. Capsular Plication for Treatment of Iatrogenic Hip Instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Dec; 4(6):e625-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.512
  199. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.512
  200. Fifty Most Cited Articles for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy. Front Surg. 2015; 2:41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  201. Blastomyces Tenosynovitis of the Foot and Ankle: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec; 54(6):1183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.503
  202. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.503
  203. Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  204. Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs Rotator Cuff Classification to the Evaluation of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears and the Clinical Correlation With Outcome After Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov; 31(11):2145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  205. Impact of Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology on Gait Assessment in Symptomatic Patients. Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct; 7(5):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.500
  206. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  207. Rehabilitation Following Hip Arthroscopy - A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2015; 2:21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.497
  208. Evaluation of Sexual Function Before and After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1850-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.496
  209. The False-Profile View May Be Used to Identify Cam Morphology. Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep; 31(9):1728-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.495
  210. Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.493
  211. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.488
  212. Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1199-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.486
  213. Arthroscopic technique for the treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Feb; 4(1):e41-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.486
  214. Endoscopic Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of the Hip. JBJS Rev. 2014 Dec 09; 2(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  215. Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):98-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.478
  216. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  217. Identification and treatment of existing copathology in anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan; 31(1):154-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  218. Operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep; 42(3):112-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  219. The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.470
  220. Arthroscopic Acetabular Microfracture With the Use of?Flexible Drills: A Technique Guide. Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Aug; 3(4):e459-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  221. Evaluating the quality of Internet information for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2014 Oct; 30(10):1372-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.467
  222. Evaluation of hip pain in young adults. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 May; 42(2):38-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.462
  223. Arthroscopic-assisted core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Feb; 3(1):e7-e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  224. Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  225. Isolated vastus lateralis tendon avulsion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Oct; 42(10):464-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  226. Operative treatment of FAI: open hip preservation surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Sep; 6(3):258-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  227. Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Sep; 6(3):207-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  228. Lymphoma as a Mimicker of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2013 Aug 28; 3(3 Suppl 5):e86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  229. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  230. Evidence of capsular defect following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr; 22(4):902-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.437
  231. Age-related differences in radiographic parameters for femoroacetabular impingement in hip arthroplasty patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.436
  232. Routine complete capsular closure during hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2013 May; 2(2):e89-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  233. Endoscopic repair of a gluteus medius tear at the musculotendinous junction. Arthrosc Tech. 2013 May; 2(2):e69-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.426
  234. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.426
  235. The burden of hip osteoarthritis in the United States: epidemiologic and economic considerations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21 Suppl 1:S1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.421
  236. Hip pain in active patients: what you may be missing. J Fam Pract. 2012 Dec; 61(12):736-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  237. Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):358-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.417
  238. The use of double-loaded suture anchors for labral repair and capsular repair during hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2012 Dec; 1(2):e213-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.416
  239. Hip osseous morphology using computer navigation and plain radiographs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Nov; 41(11):519-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.416
  240. Operative treatment of chondral defects in the hip joint: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012 Sep; 5(3):244-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.411
  241. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for complete gluteus medius tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.405
  242. New radiographic parameters to describe anterior acetabular rim trimming during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1404-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.404
  243. Improved arthroscopic visualization of peripheral compartment. Arthrosc Tech. 2012 Sep; 1(1):e57-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  244. Outcomes after the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in a mixed group of high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl:14S-9S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  245. Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Nov; 18(11):645-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  246. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears combined with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec; 26(12):1667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  247. Incidence of early development of radiolucent lines in keeled polyethylene glenoid components after total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  248. A biomechanical analysis of shoulder stabilization: posteroinferior glenohumeral capsular plication. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1413-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  249. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):764-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  250. Lateral hip pain in an athletic population: differential diagnosis and treatment options. Sports Health. 2010 May; 2(3):191-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  251. Posterior hip pain in an athletic population: differential diagnosis and treatment options. Sports Health. 2010 May; 2(3):237-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  252. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 2010 Apr; 29(2):267-82, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  253. A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1405-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  254. Hip Microfracture: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes. Cartilage. 2010 Apr; 1(2):127-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  255. Conversion of glenohumeral fusion to total shoulder arthroplasty for scapulothoracic pain: case report and surgical technique. HSS J. 2010 Feb; 6(1):14-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.336
  256. Biomechanical and biologic augmentation for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar; 38(3):619-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.336
  257. Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov; 25(11):1319-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  258. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct; 37(10):1938-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.329
  259. Anatomic reduction and next-generation fixation constructs for arthroscopic repair of crescent, L-shaped, and U-shaped rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2009 May; 25(5):553-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  260. Arthroscopic repair of L-shaped tear of the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex in a pediatric patient: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Dec; 17(12):1454-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  261. Observations on retrieved glenoid components from total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18(3):371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  262. Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jul; 25(7):788-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  263. Comparison of conforming and nonconforming retrieved glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec; 17(6):914-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  264. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation of patellar resurfacing with press-fit osteochondral autograft plugs. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.302
  265. Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan; 23(1):94-102, 102.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.278
  266. Comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying in a rabbit rotator cuff repair model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct; 15(5):630-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.271
  267. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  268. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis Identifies Use of Consumables and Operating Room Time as Factors Associated With Increased Cost of Outpatient Primary Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2023 Nov 17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  269. Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2023 11; 51(13):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  270. A guide to appropriately planning and conducting meta-analyses: part 3. Special considerations-the network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul; 31(7):2544-2549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  271. Effects of Opioid-Limiting Legislation and Increased Provider Awareness on Postoperative Opioid Use and Complications After Hip Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 May; 11(5):23259671231162340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  272. Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Obtain Information From Low-Quality Sources Online and Are Most Interested in Conservative Treatment and Expected Recovery. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb; 5(1):e21-e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  273. Noninvasive shape-fitting method quantifies cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Implications for diagnosis and surgical planning. J Orthop Res. 2023 06; 41(6):1256-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  274. External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2022 11; 50(13):3593-3599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  275. Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  276. Increased Readmission Rates but No Difference in Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip Arthroscopy: A Large Matched-Cohort Insurance Database Analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun; 4(3):e975-e988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  277. Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May; 10(5):23259671221095417.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  278. Criteria for the Operating Room Confirmation of the Diagnosis of Hip Instability: The Results of an International Expert Consensus Conference. Arthroscopy. 2022 10; 38(10):2837-2849.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  279. Revision Hip Arthroscopy for Graft Retear and Residual Cam Lesion in a Previously Labral Reconstructed Hip. Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Feb; 11(2):e139-e145.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  280. Social Media in Hip Arthroscopy Is an Underused Resource That Enhances Physician Online Reputation. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr; 4(2):e349-e357.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  281. Capsular Management with Traction-Assisted T-Capsulotomy Technique During Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Oct; 10(10):e2271-e2278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  282. The Role of Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: History, Current Practices, and Future Applications. JBJS Rev. 2021 08 20; 9(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  283. The safe zones for endoscopic proximal hamstring repair: a cadaveric assessment of standard portal placement and their relationship to major neurovascular structures. Hip Int. 2023 May; 33(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  284. Top Ten Pearls for Successful Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Aug; 10(8):e2033-e2042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  285. Remplissage and Labral Reconstruction Technique Correlated With Dynamic Hip Examination Using the Kite Technique for Restoration of the Suction Seal in Revision Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Aug; 10(8):e1995-e2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  286. Effect of Capsular Closure After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Outcomes: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Comparative Studies. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun; 9(6):23259671211017467.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  287. Hip Instability in Ballet Dancers: A Narrative Review. J Dance Med Sci. 2021 Sep 15; 25(3):176-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  288. Hip Labral Reconstruction with Capsular Autograft?Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jun; 10(6):e1547-e1551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  289. Indications and Outcomes After Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Jun; 3(3):e939-e949.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  290. A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):325-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  291. Intraoperative Guidance for the Surgical Correction of Cam Deformities Using Hip Arthroscopy Based on Alpha Angle Measurement. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 May; 10(5):e1351-e1360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  292. Capsular Management Techniques and Hip Arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):22-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  293. Tenotomy for Iliopsoas Pathology is Infrequently Performed and Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Hips Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2140-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  294. Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Feb; 9(2):2325967120981983.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  295. Proximal Hamstring Injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):339-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  296. Large Heterogeneity Among Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reporting Trends and Quantification Methods. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):1028-1037.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  297. Author Reply to "Placebo Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery" and "Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials". Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2779-2784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  298. Preparation Methods and Clinical Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Intra-articular Hip Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct; 8(10):2325967120960414.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  299. Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1261-1270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  300. Is There a Role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct; 2(5):e655-e660.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  301. No Differences in Hip Joint Space Measurements Between Weightbearing or Supine Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2843-2848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  302. Risk of intra-articular hip injury in adolescent athletes: a five-year multicentre cohort study. Int Orthop. 2020 10; 44(10):1965-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  303. Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Analyses Show Similarities in Anterosuperior Acetabular Coverage Between Acetabular Dysplasia and Borderline Dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2623-2632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  304. Sham Surgery Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery May Just Be a Sham: A Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2750-2762.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  305. Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  306. Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  307. Adjunct Analgesia Reduces Pain and Opioid Consumption After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3638-3651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  308. Three-dimensional hip joint congruity evaluation of the borderline dysplasia: Zonal-acetabular radius of curvature. J Orthop Res. 2020 10; 38(10):2197-2205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  309. What Is the Predictive Ability and Academic Impact of the Altmetrics Score and Social Media Attention? Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1056-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  310. A tiered system using substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state scores to evaluate 2-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy with the Hip Outcome Score. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jan; 7(1):62-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  311. Regarding "Fascia Iliaca Blockade With the Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Perioperative Pain Management During Hip Arthroscopy: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial". Arthroscopy. 2020 02; 36(2):329-330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  312. Best Practice Guidelines for Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results of a Delphi Process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15; 28(2):81-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  313. Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1033-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  314. Reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jan; 7(1):77-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  315. Unplanned Admissions Following Hip Arthroscopy: Incidence and Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3271-3277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  316. Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  317. Indications and Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2175-2186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  318. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2064-2069.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  319. Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  320. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  321. What Makes Suture Anchor Use Safe in Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review of Techniques and Safety Profile. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1280-1293.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  322. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  323. The Impact of Depression on Patient Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov; 6(11):2325967118806490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  324. The dimensions of the hip capsule can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging and may have a role in arthroscopic planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr; 28(4):1246-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  325. Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy: Direct Comparison of Primary Acetabular Labral Repair and Primary Acetabular Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1748-1751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  326. Patient Perspectives of Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr; 6(4):2325967118766873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  327. Effects of Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1205-1213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  328. There Is a Significant Discrepancy Between "Big Data" Database and Original Research Publications on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1998-2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  329. Prevalence and Impact of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery on Future Participation in Elite American Football Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Feb; 6(2):2325967117752307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  330. Prospective, Observational Study of Opioid Use After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1488-1497.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  331. Advanced Imaging Adds Little Value in the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20; 99(24):e133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  332. Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  333. Hip Dysplasia: Prevalence, Associated Findings, and Procedures From Large Multicenter Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 02; 34(2):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  334. Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1998-2005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  335. Prevalence of Surgical Repair for Athletic Pubalgia and Impact on Performance in Football Athletes Participating in the National Football League Combine. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1044-1049.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  336. Rotational alignment of the knee is different in osteological specimens with and without a large cam deformity of the proximal femur. Hip Int. 2017 Jul 25; 27(4):401-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  337. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  338. Acetabular rim length: an anatomical study to determine reasonable graft sizes for labral reconstruction. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):106-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  339. Arthroscopic hip preservation surgery practice patterns: an international survey. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Jan; 4(1):18-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  340. Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct; 44(10):2505-2517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  341. Hip Dislocation or Subluxation After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1428-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  342. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  343. Capsular Suspension Technique for Hip Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Aug; 4(4):e317-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  344. International trends in arthroscopic hip preservation surgery-are we treating the same patient? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jan; 2(1):28-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  345. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  346. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct; 19(7):1003-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  347. Proximal humerus fracture after keyhole biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):E61-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  348. Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  349. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Jun; 18(2):113-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  350. Biomechanical similarities among subscapularis repairs after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  351. Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid. Arthroscopy. 2010 Apr; 26(4):555-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  352. Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar; 26(3):393-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  353. Radiographic and histopathologic analysis of osteolysis after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun; 19(4):588-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  354. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan; 38(1):40-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  355. Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug; 25(8):909-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  356. Comparison of early and delayed failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Jun; 75(3):297-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  357. Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep; 467(9):2241-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  358. Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch through the subacromial space. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr; 25(4):439-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  359. Shoulder pain in the overhead throwing athlete. Sports Health. 2009 Mar; 1(2):108-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  360. Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov; 90 Suppl 4:2-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  361. Outcomes of mechanical debridement and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chondral defects: a prospective randomized study. J Knee Surg. 2008 Apr; 21(2):116-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  362. Prospective evaluation of allograft meniscus transplantation: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jun; 34(6):919-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  363. Postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan; 17(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  364. Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep; 19(7):794-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  365. Thermal chondroplasty with bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency energy: effect of treatment time on chondrocyte death and surface contouring. Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep; 18(7):779-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.