Header Logo

Connection

Shane Nho to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Humans.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
6.067
Humans
  1. Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  2. Use and Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2023 07; 51(8):2141-2150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  3. Patients Maintain Clinically Significant Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1869-1881.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. Capsular Repair Is Associated With Lower Revision Rates Yet Similar Clinical Outcomes and Arthroplasty Conversion 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 08; 39(8):1882-1891.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  6. Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2023 11; 39(11):2293-2299.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  7. Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Index Surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predict Contralateral Surgery Results at 2 Years. Arthroscopy. 2023 05; 39(5):1175-1182.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  8. Borderline Dysplastic Hips Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Achieve Equivalent Patient Reported Outcomes When Compared With Hips With Normal Acetabular Coverage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar 15; 31(6):e336-e346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  9. Ultrasound Demonstrates Potential in Identifying Proximal Femoral Morphology Before and After Cam Resection: A Cadaveric Study. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):751-757.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  11. Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Pain on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2606-2612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 03; 39(3):838-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  13. Surgical Treatment of Gluteus Medius Tears. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2115-2117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  14. Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(8):2155-2164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  15. Association Between Preoperative Patient Factors and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Machine Learning Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar; 50(3):746-756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  16. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):2090-2105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  17. Recurrence of Hamstring Injuries and Risk Factors for Partial and Complete Tears in the National Football League: An Analysis From 2009-2020. Phys Sportsmed. 2023 04; 51(2):139-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  18. Return to Sport in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2022 01; 50(1):30-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  19. Assessment of Femoral Torsion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging is More Reliable Using Axial-Oblique Sequences Compared With Standard Axial Slices in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2022 06; 38(6):1857-1866.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  20. Iliopsoas Bursitis Managed with Endoscopic Bursectomy and Lesser Trochanter Decompression: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021 11 11; 11(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  21. Author Reply to "Regarding 'Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique'". Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3225-3226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  22. Patients With a High Femoroepiphyseal Roof With Concomitant Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Do Not Demonstrate Inferior Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2022 05; 38(5):1509-1515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  23. The Natural Course of Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement According to the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and Hip Outcome Score Sports Subscale. Am J Sports Med. 2021 10; 49(12):3250-3260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  24. Intraoperative Automated Radiographic Visualization Tool Allows for Higher Accuracy of Cam Lesion Resection When Used by Novice Surgeons for Arthroscopic Femoroplasty: Lowering the Learning Curve. Arthroscopy. 2022 04; 38(4):1156-1163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  25. Multicenter Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Comparative Analysis of 2-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair Versus Labral Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021 09; 49(11):2968-2976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  26. MRI-- and CT--based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2022 05; 40(5):1174-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  27. High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  28. Association Between Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion and Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2466-2474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  29. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  30. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(9):2457-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  31. Use of Younger Patient Age and Greater Anterior Center-Edge Angle to Predict the Need for Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement-Related Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2021 07; 49(8):2110-2116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  32. Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  33. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Prolonged Opioid Use in Opioid-Na?ve Primary Hip Arthroscopy Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 05 25; 5(5):e21.00093-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  34. The Effect of Rim Preparation, Labral Augmentation, and Labral Reconstruction on the Suction Seal of the Hip. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):365-373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  35. Intraoperative Computer Vision Integrated Interactive Fluoroscopy Correlates With Successful Femoroplasty on Clinic-Based Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3371-3382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  36. Repeat Revision Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Match?That of Initial Revision But Not That of Primary Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3434-3441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  37. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  38. Surgical Treatment of Labral Tears: Debridement, Repair, and Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):e1-e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  39. Hip Instability in the Athlete: Anatomy, Etiology, and Management. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):289-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  40. Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):713-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  41. High Rate of Full Duty Return to Work After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Workers Who Are Not on Workers' Compensation. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):729-736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  42. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1833-1842.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  43. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  44. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  45. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1143-1151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  46. Author Reply to "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum'". Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2947-2948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  47. Standardizing Muscle Strength Measurement in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Response. Sports Health. 2021 Jul-Aug; 13(4):404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  48. Physical Examination of the Hip. Sports Health. 2021 Mar; 13(2):149-153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  49. Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  50. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  51. Approach to the Patient With Failed Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 01; 28(13):538-545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  52. Editorial Commentary: Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: What We Know Now and Where Do We Go From Here? Arthroscopy. 2020 07; 36(7):1862-1863.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  53. Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2433-2442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  54. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  55. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  56. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  57. Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 03; 48(4):901-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  58. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  59. Case (and capsule) closed! Can we really claim that capsular repair may not influence outcomes after hip arthroscopy? Hip Int. 2020 05; 30(3):363-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  60. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  61. Editorial Commentary: Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroscopy-Bear in Mind the Bearing of Weight. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):165-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  62. The Role of Comprehensive Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):9-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  63. Timing of Surgery: Can It Predict Outcome? Response. Am J Sports Med. 2020 01; 48(1):NP11-NP12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  64. Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  65. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  66. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  67. Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3240-3247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  68. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  69. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  70. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  71. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  72. Radiographic Prevalence of Sacroiliac Joint Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2598-2605.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  73. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  74. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  75. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  76. Surface Mapping of the Musculotendinous Attachments at the Pubic Symphysis in Cadaveric Specimens: Implications for the Treatment of Core Muscle Injury. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2358-2364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  77. Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  78. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  79. Editorial Commentary: If You Can't See It, You Can't Treat It: Proper Hip Radiographic Views Are Critical. Arthroscopy. 2019 06; 35(6):1807-1808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  80. Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  81. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  82. Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Have Asymmetrical Hip Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Compensatory Muscle Changes Associated With Preoperative Pain?Level. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1445-1453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  83. Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  84. Assessment of Association Between Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Outcomes Following Gluteus Medius Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1092-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  85. Systematic Review of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Importance of Labral Repair and Capsular Closure. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):646-656.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  86. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Sleep Quality Postoperatively. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):461-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  87. Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  88. Predictors of 5-Year Citation Rate in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Literature. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):206-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  89. Vertical Extension of the T-Capsulotomy Incision in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Does Not Affect the Force Required for Hip Distraction: Effect of Capsulotomy Size, Type, and Subsequent Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2018 11; 46(13):3127-3133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  90. Return to Golf After Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3187-3193.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  91. Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  92. Editorial Commentary: Smarter Than a Sixth Grader? Hip Arthroscopists, Check Your Training at the Door. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2150-2151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  93. Antegrade Femoral Nail Distal Interlocking Screw Causing Rupture of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Patellar Instability. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jul; 47(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  94. Editorial Commentary: What Irks a Hip Arthroscopist? Intraoperative Anchor Failure. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1217-1218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  95. Editorial Commentary: Is Vitamin D the New Wheaties? Preventing Muscle Fatigue Could Keep Athletes in the Game. Arthroscopy. 2018 04; 34(4):1286-1287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  96. Anatomy of the Pudendal Nerve and Other Neural Structures Around the Proximal Hamstring Origin in Males. Arthroscopy. 2018 07; 34(7):2105-2110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  97. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix at the Time of Gluteus Medius Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):832-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  98. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  99. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov; 45(13):3044-3051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  100. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Capsular Plication for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug; 45(10):2303-2311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  101. A Critical Review: Management and Surgical Options for Articular Defects in the Hip. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 36(3):573-586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  102. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  103. Hip Arthroscopy for Atypical Posterior Hip Pain: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun; 45(7):1627-1632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  104. Current Techniques in Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: Capsular Repair and Plication. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):49-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  105. Amateur and Recreational Athletes Return to Sport at a High Rate Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):748-755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  106. The Effect of Capsulotomy and Capsular Repair on Hip Distraction: A Cadaveric Investigation. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):559-565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  107. Femoroacetabular Impingement and Pelvic Incidence: Radiographic Comparison to an Asymptomatic Control. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):545-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  108. High Rate of Return to Running for Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 45(1):127-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  109. Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Arthroscopy. 2016 09; 32(9):1877-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  110. Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  111. Capsulotomy Size Affects Hip Joint Kinematic Stability. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1571-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  112. Hip Arthroscopy Surgical Volume Trends and 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  113. Imaging in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comprehensive Approach. Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul; 35(3):331-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  114. Vibratory sense deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016 03; 16(1):40-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  115. Complications in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Strategies for Prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec; 23(4):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  116. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  117. Blastomyces Tenosynovitis of the Foot and Ankle: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec; 54(6):1183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  118. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  119. Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  120. Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs Rotator Cuff Classification to the Evaluation of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears and the Clinical Correlation With Outcome After Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov; 31(11):2145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  121. Impact of Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology on Gait Assessment in Symptomatic Patients. Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct; 7(5):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  122. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  123. Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  124. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul; 31(7):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  125. Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1199-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  126. Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):98-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  127. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  128. Identification and treatment of existing copathology in anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan; 31(1):154-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  129. Operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep; 42(3):112-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  130. The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  131. Evaluating the quality of Internet information for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2014 Oct; 30(10):1372-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  132. Evaluation of hip pain in young adults. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 May; 42(2):38-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  133. Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  134. Isolated vastus lateralis tendon avulsion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Oct; 42(10):464-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  135. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  136. Evidence of capsular defect following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr; 22(4):902-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  137. Age-related differences in radiographic parameters for femoroacetabular impingement in hip arthroplasty patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  138. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  139. Hip pain in active patients: what you may be missing. J Fam Pract. 2012 Dec; 61(12):736-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  140. Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):358-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  141. Hip osseous morphology using computer navigation and plain radiographs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Nov; 41(11):519-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  142. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for complete gluteus medius tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  143. Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Nov; 18(11):645-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  144. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears combined with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec; 26(12):1667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  145. Incidence of early development of radiolucent lines in keeled polyethylene glenoid components after total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  146. A biomechanical analysis of shoulder stabilization: posteroinferior glenohumeral capsular plication. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1413-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  147. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):764-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  148. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 2010 Apr; 29(2):267-82, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  149. A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1405-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  150. Biomechanical and biologic augmentation for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar; 38(3):619-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  151. Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov; 25(11):1319-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  152. Arthroscopic repair of L-shaped tear of the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex in a pediatric patient: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Dec; 17(12):1454-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  153. Observations on retrieved glenoid components from total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18(3):371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  154. Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jul; 25(7):788-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  155. Comparison of conforming and nonconforming retrieved glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec; 17(6):914-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  156. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation of patellar resurfacing with press-fit osteochondral autograft plugs. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  157. Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan; 23(1):94-102, 102.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  158. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  159. Association of Changes in Hip and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Squat With Changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2023 11; 51(13):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  160. A guide to appropriately planning and conducting meta-analyses: part 3. Special considerations-the network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul; 31(7):2544-2549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  161. Noninvasive shape-fitting method quantifies cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Implications for diagnosis and surgical planning. J Orthop Res. 2023 06; 41(6):1256-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  162. External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2022 11; 50(13):3593-3599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  163. Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  164. Criteria for the Operating Room Confirmation of the Diagnosis of Hip Instability: The Results of an International Expert Consensus Conference. Arthroscopy. 2022 10; 38(10):2837-2849.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  165. The safe zones for endoscopic proximal hamstring repair: a cadaveric assessment of standard portal placement and their relationship to major neurovascular structures. Hip Int. 2023 May; 33(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  166. Hip Instability in Ballet Dancers: A Narrative Review. J Dance Med Sci. 2021 Sep 15; 25(3):176-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  167. A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):325-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  168. Capsular Management Techniques and Hip Arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Mar 01; 29(1):22-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  169. Tenotomy for Iliopsoas Pathology is Infrequently Performed and Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Hips Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2140-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  170. Proximal Hamstring Injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr; 40(2):339-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  171. Large Heterogeneity Among Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reporting Trends and Quantification Methods. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):1028-1037.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  172. Author Reply to "Placebo Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery" and "Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials". Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2779-2784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  173. Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals Are Associated With Higher Altmetric Attention Scores and Social Media Attention Than Nonorthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1261-1270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  174. No Differences in Hip Joint Space Measurements Between Weightbearing or Supine Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2843-2848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  175. Risk of intra-articular hip injury in adolescent athletes: a five-year multicentre cohort study. Int Orthop. 2020 10; 44(10):1965-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  176. Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Analyses Show Similarities in Anterosuperior Acetabular Coverage Between Acetabular Dysplasia and Borderline Dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2623-2632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  177. Sham Surgery Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery May Just Be a Sham: A Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2750-2762.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  178. Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  179. Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  180. Three-dimensional hip joint congruity evaluation of the borderline dysplasia: Zonal-acetabular radius of curvature. J Orthop Res. 2020 10; 38(10):2197-2205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  181. Adjunct Analgesia Reduces Pain and Opioid Consumption After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3638-3651.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  182. Regarding "Fascia Iliaca Blockade With the Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Perioperative Pain Management During Hip Arthroscopy: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial". Arthroscopy. 2020 02; 36(2):329-330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  183. Best Practice Guidelines for Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results of a Delphi Process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15; 28(2):81-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  184. Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1033-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  185. Unplanned Admissions Following Hip Arthroscopy: Incidence and Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3271-3277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  186. Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  187. Indications and Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2175-2186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  188. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2064-2069.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  189. Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  190. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  191. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  192. The dimensions of the hip capsule can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging and may have a role in arthroscopic planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr; 28(4):1246-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  193. Effects of Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1205-1213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  194. There Is a Significant Discrepancy Between "Big Data" Database and Original Research Publications on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018 06; 34(6):1998-2004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  195. Prospective, Observational Study of Opioid Use After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1488-1497.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  196. Advanced Imaging Adds Little Value in the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20; 99(24):e133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  197. Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  198. Hip Dysplasia: Prevalence, Associated Findings, and Procedures From Large Multicenter Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 02; 34(2):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  199. Variability and Comprehensiveness of North American Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov; 33(11):1998-2005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  200. Prevalence of Surgical Repair for Athletic Pubalgia and Impact on Performance in Football Athletes Participating in the National Football League Combine. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1044-1049.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  201. Rotational alignment of the knee is different in osteological specimens with and without a large cam deformity of the proximal femur. Hip Int. 2017 Jul 25; 27(4):401-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  202. Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Jan/Feb; 46(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  203. Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct; 44(10):2505-2517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  204. Hip Dislocation or Subluxation After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1428-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  205. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  206. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  207. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct; 19(7):1003-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  208. Proximal humerus fracture after keyhole biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):E61-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  209. Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  210. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Jun; 18(2):113-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  211. Biomechanical similarities among subscapularis repairs after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  212. Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid. Arthroscopy. 2010 Apr; 26(4):555-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  213. Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar; 26(3):393-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  214. Radiographic and histopathologic analysis of osteolysis after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun; 19(4):588-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  215. Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug; 25(8):909-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  216. Comparison of early and delayed failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Jun; 75(3):297-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  217. Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch through the subacromial space. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr; 25(4):439-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  218. Outcomes of mechanical debridement and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chondral defects: a prospective randomized study. J Knee Surg. 2008 Apr; 21(2):116-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  219. Prospective evaluation of allograft meniscus transplantation: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jun; 34(6):919-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  220. Postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan; 17(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  221. Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep; 19(7):794-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  222. Thermal chondroplasty with bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency energy: effect of treatment time on chondrocyte death and surface contouring. Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep; 18(7):779-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.