Header Logo

Connection

Shane Nho to Female

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Shane Nho has written about Female.
Shane Nho
Connection Strength
4.281
Female
  1. Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2023 08; 51(10):2540-2550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  2. Results of Endoscopic Labral Repair With Concomitant Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair Compared With Outcomes of Labral Repair Alone: A Matched Comparative Cohort Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023 06; 51(7):1818-1825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  3. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022 08; 50(10):2629-2636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  4. Outcomes for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Computed Tomography Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(8):2155-2164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  5. Iliopsoas Bursitis Managed with Endoscopic Bursectomy and Lesser Trochanter Decompression: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021 11 11; 11(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  6. High rate of return to tennis after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  7. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Functional Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 06 16; 103(12):1055-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  8. Multicenter Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Two-Year Outcomes After Labral Repair, Segmental Labral Reconstruction, or Circumferential Labral Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):352-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  9. Intraoperative Computer Vision Integrated Interactive Fluoroscopy Correlates With Successful Femoroplasty on Clinic-Based Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2021 11; 37(11):3371-3382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  10. Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 08; 37(8):2488-2496.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  11. Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2021 03; 49(3):713-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  12. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Clinically Significant Functional Improvement in a Mixed Population of Primary Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1488-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  13. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1467-1473.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  14. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021 04; 37(4):1143-1151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  15. Improvements in Sleep Quality Are Maintained at a Minimum of 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2021 03; 37(3):873-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  16. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2020 12; 36(12):2992-2997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  17. Comparison of Suction Seal and Contact Pressures Between 270? Labral Reconstruction, Labral Repair, and the Intact Labrum. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2433-2442.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  18. Patients With a Hypotrophic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair Compared With Patients With a Normal-Sized Labrum: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 346 Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2614-2620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  19. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020 06; 48(7):1616-1624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  20. Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Sports Health. 2020 Jul/Aug; 12(4):361-372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  21. The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 06; 36(6):1599-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  22. Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular?Incompetency. Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):127-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  23. Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1022-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  24. The Influence of Lumbosacral Spine Pathology on Minimum 2-Year Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy: A Nested Case-Control Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):403-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  25. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020 02; 48(2):415-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  26. Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3240-3247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  27. Is There an Association Between Preoperative Expectations and Patient-Reported Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3250-3258.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  28. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020 03; 36(3):734-742.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  29. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3141-3147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  30. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 11; 47(13):3133-3140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  31. Radiographic Prevalence of Sacroiliac Joint Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 09; 35(9):2598-2605.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  32. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2636-2645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  33. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2019 09; 47(11):2626-2635.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  34. Preoperative Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Athletic Functional Status After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019 11; 35(11):3049-3056.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  35. Early Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Provides Superior Outcomes When Compared With Delaying Surgical Treatment Beyond 6 Months. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2038-2044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  36. Survivorship and Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Performed With Modern Surgical Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019 06; 47(7):1662-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  37. Influence of Cigarette Smoking at the Time of Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched-Pair Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1138-1144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  38. Influence of Acetabular Labral Tear Length on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2019 04; 47(5):1145-1150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  39. Patients With Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Have Asymmetrical Hip Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Compensatory Muscle Changes Associated With Preoperative Pain?Level. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1445-1453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  40. Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1101-1108.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  41. Assessment of Association Between Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Outcomes Following Gluteus Medius Repair. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1092-1098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  42. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Sleep Quality Postoperatively. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):461-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  43. Preoperative Symptom Duration Is Associated With Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2019 01; 47(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  44. Return to Golf After Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 12; 34(12):3187-3193.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  45. Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Regardless of Gender. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct; 38(9):465-470.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  46. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix at the Time of Gluteus Medius Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):832-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  47. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 02; 46(2):288-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  48. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov; 45(13):3044-3051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  49. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Capsular Plication for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug; 45(10):2303-2311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  50. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2116-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  51. Hip Arthroscopy for Atypical Posterior Hip Pain: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun; 45(7):1627-1632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  52. Amateur and Recreational Athletes Return to Sport at a High Rate Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr; 33(4):748-755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  53. Femoroacetabular Impingement and Pelvic Incidence: Radiographic Comparison to an Asymptomatic Control. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar; 33(3):545-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  54. High Rate of Return to Running for Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Capsular Plication. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan; 45(1):127-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  55. Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18; 98(10):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  56. Capsulotomy Size Affects Hip Joint Kinematic Stability. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1571-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  57. Hip Arthroscopy Surgical Volume Trends and 30-Day Postoperative Complications. Arthroscopy. 2016 07; 32(7):1286-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  58. Vibratory sense deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016 03; 16(1):40-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  59. Complications in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Strategies for Prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec; 23(4):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  60. Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar; 32(3):468-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  61. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification. Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  62. Effects of acetabular rim trimming on hip joint contact pressures: how much is too much? Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep; 43(9):2138-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  63. Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs Rotator Cuff Classification to the Evaluation of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears and the Clinical Correlation With Outcome After Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov; 31(11):2145-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  64. Impact of Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology on Gait Assessment in Symptomatic Patients. Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct; 7(5):429-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  65. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 43(8):1844-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  66. Biomechanical Evaluation of Capsulotomy, Capsulectomy, and Capsular Repair on Hip Rotation. Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug; 31(8):1511-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  67. Labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autografts and semitendinosus allografts improves hip joint contact area and contact pressure: an in vitro analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan; 43(1):98-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  68. Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2634-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  69. The use of manual therapy post-hip arthroscopy when an exercise-based therapy approach has failed: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Sep; 44(9):712-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  70. Computed tomographic analysis of curved and straight guides for placement of suture anchors for acetabular labral refixation. Arthroscopy. 2013 Oct; 29(10):1623-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  71. Effect of anterior acetabular rim recession on radiographic parameters: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1292-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  72. Evidence of capsular defect following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr; 22(4):902-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  73. Age-related differences in radiographic parameters for femoroacetabular impingement in hip arthroplasty patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  74. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar; 29(3):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  75. Hip pain in active patients: what you may be missing. J Fam Pract. 2012 Dec; 61(12):736-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  76. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for complete gluteus medius tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct; 28(10):1410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  77. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears combined with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec; 26(12):1667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  78. Incidence of early development of radiolucent lines in keeled polyethylene glenoid components after total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  79. A biomechanical analysis of shoulder stabilization: posteroinferior glenohumeral capsular plication. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1413-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  80. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul; 19(5):764-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  81. A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul; 38(7):1405-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  82. Observations on retrieved glenoid components from total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18(3):371-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  83. Comparison of conforming and nonconforming retrieved glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec; 17(6):914-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  84. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation of patellar resurfacing with press-fit osteochondral autograft plugs. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  85. The effect of radiofrequency energy on nonweight-bearing areas of bone following shoulder and knee arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2005 Apr; 28(4):392-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  86. Relationship of Average Outcomes Scores and Change in Status Requires Further Interpretation Between 1 and 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2022 10; 50(12):3184-3189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  87. A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2022 02; 38(2):325-331.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  88. No Differences in Hip Joint Space Measurements Between Weightbearing or Supine Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2843-2848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  89. Risk of intra-articular hip injury in adolescent athletes: a five-year multicentre cohort study. Int Orthop. 2020 10; 44(10):1965-1969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  90. Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Analyses Show Similarities in Anterosuperior Acetabular Coverage Between Acetabular Dysplasia and Borderline Dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2623-2632.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  91. Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  92. Defining Variations in Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Am J Sports Med. 2020 04; 48(5):1175-1180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  93. Three-dimensional hip joint congruity evaluation of the borderline dysplasia: Zonal-acetabular radius of curvature. J Orthop Res. 2020 10; 38(10):2197-2205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  94. Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function. Arthroscopy. 2020 04; 36(4):1033-1038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  95. Unplanned Admissions Following Hip Arthroscopy: Incidence and Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2019 12; 35(12):3271-3277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  96. Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2019 08; 35(8):2338-2345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  97. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):2064-2069.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  98. Surgical Treatment of Septic Shoulders: A Comparison Between Arthrotomy and Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2019 07; 35(7):1984-1991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  99. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1457-1462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  100. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy. 2019 02; 35(2):411-416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  101. Effects of Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2018 04; 46(5):1205-1213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  102. Prospective, Observational Study of Opioid Use After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2018 05; 34(5):1488-1497.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  103. Advanced Imaging Adds Little Value in the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20; 99(24):e133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  104. Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 03; 34(3):844-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  105. Hip Dysplasia: Prevalence, Associated Findings, and Procedures From Large Multicenter Arthroscopy Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2018 02; 34(2):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  106. Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct; 44(10):2505-2517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  107. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  108. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  109. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct; 19(7):1003-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  110. Proximal humerus fracture after keyhole biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jul; 39(7):E61-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  111. Early return to work in workers' compensation patients after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug; 26(8):1027-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  112. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Jun; 18(2):113-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  113. Comparison of early and delayed failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Jun; 75(3):297-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  114. Outcomes of mechanical debridement and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chondral defects: a prospective randomized study. J Knee Surg. 2008 Apr; 21(2):116-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  115. Prospective evaluation of allograft meniscus transplantation: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jun; 34(6):919-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  116. Postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2004 Jan; 17(1):18-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.