Header Logo

Connection

Hannah Lundberg to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Hannah Lundberg has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.692
  1. Effect of Femoral Head Material, Surgeon Experience, and Assembly Technique on Simulated Head-Neck Total Hip Arthroplasty Impaction Forces. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb; 39(2):507-513.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  2. Model validation for estimating taper microgroove deformation during total hip arthroplasty head-neck assembly. J Biomech. 2022 07; 140:111172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  3. Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head-stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 2023 02; 41(2):418-425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  4. Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 01; 125:104939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  5. Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):33-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  6. Sensitivity of total knee replacement wear to variability in motion and load input: A parametric finite element analysis study. J Orthop Res. 2020 07; 38(7):1538-1549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  7. Contact conditions for total hip head-neck modular taper junctions with microgrooved stem tapers. J Biomech. 2020 04 16; 103:109689.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  8. The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3. J Biomech. 2019 May 09; 88:104-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  9. Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties? J Arthroplasty. 2017 07; 32(7):2268-2273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  11. Comparison of Antagonist Muscle Activity During Walking Between Total Knee Replacement and Control Subjects Using Unnormalized Electromyography. J Arthroplasty. 2016 06; 31(6):1331-1339.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  12. Methods for locating the tibio-femoral contact pathway in total knee replacements using marker-based gait analysis and standard radiography. Iowa Orthop J. 2014; 34:94-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Fine tuning total knee replacement contact force prediction algorithms using blinded model validation. J Biomech Eng. 2013 Feb; 135(2):021015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  14. Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012 Mar; 226(3):227-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  15. Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns. J Biomech. 2012 Apr 05; 45(6):990-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  16. A parametric approach to numerical modeling of TKR contact forces. J Biomech. 2009 Mar 11; 42(4):541-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. Association of third body embedment with rim damage in retrieved acetabular liners. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec; 465:133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Effects of implant design parameters on fluid convection, potentiating third-body debris ingress into the bearing surface during THA impingement/subluxation. J Biomech. 2007; 40(8):1676-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  19. Nonidentical and outlier duty cycles as factors accelerating UHMWPE wear in THA: a finite element exploration. J Orthop Res. 2007 Jan; 25(1):30-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Problematic sites of third body embedment in polyethylene for total hip wear acceleration. J Biomech. 2006; 39(7):1208-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  21. Effect of Lumbar Fusion and Pelvic Fixation Rigidity on Hip Joint Stress: A Finite Element Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Oct 15; 48(20):E355-E361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  22. Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 09 01; 479(9):2083-2096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  23. Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 06; 118:104443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  24. Can a gait-dependent model predict wear on retrieved total knee arthroplasty components? Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):129-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  25. What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2707-2711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  26. Mechanical, chemical and biological damage modes within head-neck tapers of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V contemporary hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 07; 106(5):1672-1685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  27. A reduction in the knee adduction moment with medial thrust gait is associated with a medial shift in center of plantar pressure. Med Eng Phys. 2016 07; 38(7):615-621.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Hamstring Activity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patient: Injury Implications and Comparison With Quadriceps Activity. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1651-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  29. Tribocorrosion and oral and maxillofacial surgical devices. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May; 52(5):396-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. 2009 Nicolas Andry Award: clinical biomechanics of third body acceleration of total hip wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jul; 467(7):1885-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  31. Effects of episodic subluxation events on third body ingress and embedment in the THA bearing surface. J Biomech. 2008 Jul 19; 41(10):2090-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  32. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging. Radiology. 2004 Dec; 233(3):768-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.