Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Brett Levine and Scott Sporer.
Connection Strength
3.972
-
Modern Description of Antibiotic Spacer Options for PJI in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Infection Eradication Rates. J Arthroplasty. 2023 06; 38(6S):S318-S325.
Score: 0.224
-
Machine learning algorithms predict within one size of the final implant ultimately used in total knee arthroplasty with good-to-excellent accuracy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug; 30(8):2565-2572.
Score: 0.206
-
The Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Total Joint Arthroplasty Care. J Arthroplasty. 2021 08; 36(8):2729-2733.
Score: 0.194
-
Knee Arthrodesis With an Intramedullary Antegrade Rod as a Salvage Procedure for the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 09; 4(9):e20.00082-6.
Score: 0.187
-
Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1402-1406.
Score: 0.178
-
Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec; 34(12):3012-3017.e1.
Score: 0.173
-
Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator. J Arthroplasty. 2019 07; 34(7):1369-1373.
Score: 0.169
-
Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Patient's Perspective. Iowa Orthop J. 2019; 39(1):211-216.
Score: 0.167
-
Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Satisfaction After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 04; 34(4):663-670.
Score: 0.166
-
Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 12; 33(12):3759-3767.
Score: 0.162
-
Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
Score: 0.153
-
Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):362-365.
Score: 0.153
-
Can Demographic Variables Accurately Predict Component Sizing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2017 10; 32(10):3004-3008.
Score: 0.149
-
Prospective Assessment of Sleep Quality Before and After Primary Total Joint Replacement. Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 01; 40(4):e636-e640.
Score: 0.148
-
Perceived Leg-Length Discrepancy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Knee Alignment Play a Role? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec; 45(7):E429-E433.
Score: 0.143
-
Evaluation of the Role for Synovial Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 07; 97(19):1597-603.
Score: 0.133
-
The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3.
Score: 0.130
-
Author reply: "correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun; 29(6):1329-30.
Score: 0.118
-
The effect of payer type on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):295-8.
Score: 0.115
-
Correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb; 29(2):438-42.
Score: 0.114
-
Correlation of aspiration results with aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct; 28(9):1671-6.
Score: 0.114
-
Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
Score: 0.079
-
The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
Score: 0.079
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
Score: 0.078
-
Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul; 20(3):185-94.
Score: 0.075
-
Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006 Sep; 27(27):4671-81.
Score: 0.070
-
Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 02; 35(2):538-543.e1.
Score: 0.044
-
High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
Score: 0.040
-
Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
Score: 0.038
-
Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):140-3.
Score: 0.034
-
Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
Score: 0.032
-
The inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Paprosky femoral bone loss classification system. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul; 29(7):1482-4.
Score: 0.030
-
Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
Score: 0.028
-
Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
Score: 0.027
-
Patient perception of physician reimbursement in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):703-9.
Score: 0.026