Brett Levine to Prosthesis Design
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brett Levine has written about Prosthesis Design.
Connection Strength
4.074
-
A Survey of the Prevalence of and Techniques to Prevent Trunnionosis. Orthopedics. 2018 Jul 01; 41(4):e557-e562.
Score: 0.514
-
Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
Score: 0.493
-
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem. J Arthroplasty. 2017 12; 32(12):3698-3703.
Score: 0.483
-
Cementless vs Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 05; 32(5):1510-1515.
Score: 0.465
-
Modularity of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Apr; 20(4):214-22.
Score: 0.335
-
Mid-Term Survivorship, Performance, and Predictors of Outcome in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Porous Tantalum Femoral Prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2021 05; 36(5):1688-1694.
Score: 0.153
-
Wagner Cone Midterm Survivorship and Outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2020 08; 35(8):2155-2160.
Score: 0.146
-
Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec; 34(12):3012-3017.e1.
Score: 0.139
-
Fracture of a Titanium Non-Modular Femoral Stem After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2018 Dec; 76(4):278-284.
Score: 0.133
-
High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
Score: 0.127
-
Taper Failure After Large-Diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2016 Sep 01; 39(5):e984-7.
Score: 0.112
-
The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3.
Score: 0.104
-
Fracture of a dual-modular femoral component at the stem-sleeve junction in a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Mar; 43(3):E57-60.
Score: 0.096
-
Pseudotumor from modular neck corrosion after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Sep; 41(9):422-6.
Score: 0.086
-
Fracture of the modular femoral neck component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jan; 28(1):196.e1-5.
Score: 0.080
-
The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
Score: 0.063
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
Score: 0.063
-
Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul; 20(3):185-94.
Score: 0.060
-
Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Nov; 14(12):646-55.
Score: 0.058
-
Long-term radiographic evaluation of Trilock press-fit acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2005; 62(3-4):115-20.
Score: 0.051
-
Effect of Femoral Head Material, Surgeon Experience, and Assembly Technique on Simulated Head-Neck Total Hip Arthroplasty Impaction Forces. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb; 39(2):507-513.e1.
Score: 0.046
-
Has Wrought Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy Changed for the Worse Over Time? J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S280-S284.
Score: 0.045
-
Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head-stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 2023 02; 41(2):418-425.
Score: 0.042
-
Indication for Proximal Femoral Replacement Is Associated With Risk of Failure. J Arthroplasty. 2022 05; 37(5):917-924.
Score: 0.041
-
Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul; 102-B(7_Supple_B):33-40.
Score: 0.037
-
Contact conditions for total hip head-neck modular taper junctions with microgrooved stem tapers. J Biomech. 2020 04 16; 103:109689.
Score: 0.036
-
Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem? J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S278-S283.
Score: 0.036
-
Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42.
Score: 0.029