Header Logo

Connection

Brian Forsythe to Minimal Clinically Important Difference

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Forsythe has written about Minimal Clinically Important Difference.
  1. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery? Arthroscopy. 2020 01; 36(1):241-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.636
  2. Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Apr; 28(4):639-647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.597
  3. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 12; 37(12):3479-3486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  4. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2021 06; 37(6):1731-1739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  5. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3439-3446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  6. Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 12; 48(14):3447-3453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  7. How can we define clinically important improvement in pain scores after biceps tenodesis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb; 30(2):430-438.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  8. Influence of mental health on postoperative outcomes in patients following biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov; 29(11):2248-2256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  9. Predictive Factors and the Duration to Pre-Injury Work Status Following Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2019 04; 35(4):1026-1033.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  10. Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  11. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct; 30(10):2231-2239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  13. Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr; 30(4):e137-e146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  14. Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy. Arthroscopy. 2019 05; 35(5):1567-1575.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.