Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Craig Della Valle and Brett Levine.
Craig Della Valle
Connection Strength
3.298
Brett Levine
  1. Use of a barbed suture in the closure of hip and knee arthroplasty wounds. Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 09; 34(9):e473-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.398
  2. Are Postoperative Hip Precautions Necessary After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Posterior Approach? Preliminary Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S246-S251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  3. Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 02; 35(2):538-543.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  4. Physical Therapy on Postoperative Day Zero Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 394 Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S173-S177.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  5. The Use of Closed Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 May 01; 26(9):295-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  6. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  7. Do Mortality and Complication Rates Differ Between Periprosthetic and Native Hip Fractures? J Arthroplasty. 2018 06; 33(6):1914-1918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  8. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  9. Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):362-365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  10. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  11. Poor Outcomes of Irrigation and Debridement in Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Impregnated Calcium Sulfate Beads. J Arthroplasty. 2017 08; 32(8):2505-2507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  12. Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):140-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  13. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  14. Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec; 27(10):1783-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  15. Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep; 468(9):2382-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  16. Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  17. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  18. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  19. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul; 20(3):185-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  20. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Nov; 14(12):646-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  21. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006 Sep; 27(27):4671-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  22. Medicare Cuts to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgeon Fees in 2021: Will Access to Care Be Jeopardized? J Arthroplasty. 2021 03; 36(3):791-794.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  23. Medicare Reimbursement for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty From 2000 to 2019: An Unsustainable Trend. J Arthroplasty. 2020 05; 35(5):1174-1178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  24. External Validity of a New Prediction Model for Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug; 34(8):1677-1681.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  25. Does peritrochanteric fat thickness increase the risk of early reoperation for infection or wound complications following total hip arthroplasty? J Orthop. 2019 Sep-Oct; 16(5):359-362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  26. Hip and Knee Section, Diagnosis, Algorithm: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019 02; 34(2S):S339-S350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  27. The Impact of an Acute, Traumatic Wound Dehiscence on Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2613-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  28. Perceived Leg-Length Discrepancy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Knee Alignment Play a Role? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec; 45(7):E429-E433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  29. How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):596-602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  30. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  31. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  32. Patient perception of physician reimbursement in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):703-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.