Header Logo

Connection

Craig Della Valle to Aged, 80 and over

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Craig Della Valle has written about Aged, 80 and over.
Craig Della Valle
Connection Strength
3.961
Aged, 80 and over
  1. The Cost-Effectiveness of Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022 06; 37(6S):S50-S55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  2. Gender Differences for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Complications and Healthcare Utilization. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug; 34(8):1593-1597.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  3. Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 06; 101(3):250-256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  4. Synovial Fluid Alpha-Defensin Is an Adjunctive Tool in the Equivocal Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 11; 33(11):3537-3540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  5. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  6. Risk Adjustment Is Necessary in Medicare Bundled Payment Models for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2368-2375.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  7. Impact of Operative Time on Adverse Events Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7):2256-2262.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  8. Can Total Knee Arthroplasty Be Performed Safely as an Outpatient in the Medicare Population? J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S28-S31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  9. The Alpha-Defensin Test for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Setting of an Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Secondary to a Failed Metal-on-Metal Bearing or Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction. J Arthroplasty. 2018 06; 33(6):1896-1898.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  10. Serum Albumin Predicts Survival and Postoperative Course Following Surgery for Geriatric Hip Fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 12 20; 99(24):2110-2118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  11. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications of Pneumonia After Surgery for Geriatric Hip Fracture. J Arthroplasty. 2018 05; 33(5):1552-1556.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  12. Same-Day Discharge Compared with Inpatient Hospitalization Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 06; 99(23):1969-1977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  13. The Influence of Patient Gender on Morbidity Following Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):345-349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  14. Sepsis Within 30 Days of Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2017 10; 32(10):3114-3119.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  15. Poor Outcomes of Irrigation and Debridement in Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Impregnated Calcium Sulfate Beads. J Arthroplasty. 2017 08; 32(8):2505-2507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  16. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Mini-Incision Posterior and 2-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2017 08; 32(8):2462-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  17. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications of Pneumonia Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 06; 32(6):1991-1995.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  18. Aseptic Lymphocytic-Dominated Vasculitis-Associated Lesions Scores Do Not Correlate With Metal Ion Levels or Unreadable Synovial Fluid White Blood Cell Counts. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1340-1343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  19. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Sources of Sepsis Following Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 12; 31(12):2875-2879.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  20. Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):140-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  21. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  22. Patient Attitudes Toward Orthopedic Surgeon Ownership of Related Ancillary Businesses. J Arthroplasty. 2016 08; 31(8):1635-1640.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  23. Is Hypoalbuminemia Associated With Septic Failure and Acute Infection After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Study of 4517 Patients From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplasty. 2016 05; 31(5):963-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  24. Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr; 31(4):846-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  25. Hypoalbuminemia Independently Predicts Surgical Site Infection, Pneumonia, Length of Stay, and Readmission After Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):15-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  26. Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):152-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  27. Are Financial Conflicts of Interest for the Surgeon A Source of Concern for the Patient? J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):21-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  28. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction for extensor mechanism failure following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 18; 97(4):279-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  29. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  30. Is potential malnutrition associated with septic failure and acute infection after revision total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan; 473(1):175-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  31. Is synovial C-reactive protein a useful marker for periprosthetic joint infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3997-4003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  32. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  33. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  34. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Should prophylactic antibiotics be withheld before revision surgery to obtain appropriate cultures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan; 472(1):52-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  35. Should draining wounds and sinuses associated with hip and knee arthroplasties be cultured? J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):133-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  36. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  37. Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):286-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  38. Leukocyte esterase reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):8-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  39. The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):126-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  40. Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 04; 94(7):594-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  41. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  42. What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):1002-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  43. Intraoperative molds to create an articulating spacer for the infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):994-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  44. The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan; 469(1):34-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  45. Hematologic genetic testing in high-risk patients before knee arthroplasty: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan; 469(1):131-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  46. Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep; 468(9):2382-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  47. Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):62-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  48. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  49. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  50. Interprosthetic fractures of the femur: treatment with a single-locked plate. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb; 25(2):280-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  51. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan; 467(1):72-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  52. Femoral fracture through a previous pin site after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr; 23(3):462-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  53. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  54. Duplex ultrasonography in patients suspected of postoperative pulmonary embolism following total joint arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003 Aug; 32(8):386-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  55. Anticoagulant treatment of thromboembolism with intravenous heparin therapy in the early postoperative period following total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Feb; 82(2):207-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  56. External Validity of a New Prediction Model for Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug; 34(8):1677-1681.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  57. The Impact of an Acute, Traumatic Wound Dehiscence on Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2613-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  58. How Common-and How Serious- Is Clostridium difficile Colitis After Geriatric Hip Fracture? Findings from the NSQIP Dataset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 03; 476(3):453-462.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  59. Nephrotoxicity After the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7):2225-2229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  60. Do Mortality and Complication Rates Differ Between Periprosthetic and Native Hip Fractures? J Arthroplasty. 2018 06; 33(6):1914-1918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. High Failure Rates of Concomitant Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Extensor Mechanism Disruption. J Arthroplasty. 2018 06; 33(6):1879-1883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  62. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  63. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Clostridium difficile Colitis Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):205-210.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  64. Perceived Leg-Length Discrepancy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Knee Alignment Play a Role? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec; 45(7):E429-E433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  65. Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Enterococci Have Poor Outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2017 03; 32(3):933-947.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  66. Leukocyte Esterase: Metal-on-Metal Failure and Periprosthetic Joint?Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2016 10; 31(10):2260-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  67. What Factors Influence the Success of Medial Gastrocnemius Flaps in the Treatment of Infected TKAs? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Mar; 474(3):752-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  68. How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):596-602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  69. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  70. Primary Repair of Iatrogenic Medial Collateral Ligament Injury During TKA: A Modified Technique. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May; 30(5):854-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  71. Outcome of one-stage cementless exchange for acute postoperative periprosthetic hip infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct; 471(10):3214-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  72. Acute hematogenous infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar; 29(3):469-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  73. Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multi-center study. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):45-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  74. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk! J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  75. Recurrent periprosthetic joint infection: persistent or new infection? J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct; 28(9):1486-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  76. Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  77. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan; 471(1):102-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  78. Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec; 27(10):1783-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  79. Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 17; 94(20):1877-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  80. Low rate of infection control in enterococcal periprosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct; 470(10):2708-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  81. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  82. Patient perception of physician reimbursement in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):703-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  83. Infection control rate of irrigation and d?bridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov; 469(11):3043-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  84. Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar; 469(3):839-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  85. Synovial fluid biomarkers for periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2017-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  86. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  87. Microbiological, clinical, and surgical features of fungal prosthetic joint infections: a multi-institutional experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov; 91 Suppl 6:142-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  88. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  89. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep; 90(9):1869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  90. Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  91. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  92. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  93. Minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing TKA: results of a comprehensive pathway for outpatient TKA. J Knee Surg. 2006 Apr; 19(2):145-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  94. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May; 87(5):999-1006.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  95. The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov; (428):92-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  96. Role of knee aspiration after resection of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2001 Apr; 30(4):305-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.