Header Logo

Connection

Craig Della Valle to Prosthesis Failure

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Craig Della Valle has written about Prosthesis Failure.
Craig Della Valle
Connection Strength
7.766
Prosthesis Failure
  1. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.468
  2. Diagnosing Taper Corrosion: When Is It the Taper and When Is It Something Else? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2712-2715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.466
  3. Aseptic Lymphocytic-Dominated Vasculitis-Associated Lesions Scores Do Not Correlate With Metal Ion Levels or Unreadable Synovial Fluid White Blood Cell Counts. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1340-1343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.426
  4. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.403
  5. Is potential malnutrition associated with septic failure and acute infection after revision total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan; 473(1):175-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.374
  6. What do we know about taper corrosion in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr; 29(4):668-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  7. Outcomes and complications of unicondylar arthroplasty. Clin Sports Med. 2014 Jan; 33(1):149-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  8. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.328
  9. Case report: Failure of rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis by disengagement of the hinge-post extension. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr; 471(4):1389-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  10. Instability in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 09; 34(9):e519-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.297
  11. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  12. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S206-S210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  13. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Early Aseptic Loosening in a Large National Database. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7 Suppl 2):S215-S220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  14. Use of a monoblock dual-mobility acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation. Hip Int. 2022 Sep; 32(5):648-655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  15. Revision Surgery for Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Timing Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2021 05; 36(5):1779-1783.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  16. 2020 Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  17. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct; 34(10):2392-2397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  18. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age at a Mean of 16 Years: Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Significantly Reduces the Risk of Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S238-S241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  19. Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 06; 101(3):250-256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  20. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):11-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  21. Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018 02; 33(2):362-365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  22. Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions?Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total?Hip?Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S272-S277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  23. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  24. Leukocyte Esterase: Metal-on-Metal Failure and Periprosthetic Joint?Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2016 10; 31(10):2260-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  25. Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr; 31(4):846-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  26. Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):152-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  27. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  28. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  29. Metal ion levels in maternal and placental blood after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Dec; 43(12):E304-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  30. Dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty: acute management in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec; 32(12):1554.e1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  31. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  32. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk! J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  33. Complications of total knee arthroplasty: standardized list and definitions of the Knee Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan; 471(1):215-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  34. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan; 471(1):102-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  35. What would you do?: challenges in hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):70-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  36. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  37. Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):286-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  38. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  39. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 16; 93(22):e130(1-6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  40. Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar; 469(3):839-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  41. Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep; 468(9):2382-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  42. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  43. "An anatomic study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):640; author reply 640-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  44. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  45. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  46. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug; 87(8):1795-800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  47. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):239-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  48. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  49. A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec; 16(8):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  50. Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2536-2540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  51. Midterm Results of a Contemporary, Porous-Coated Acetabular System in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Replacement for Degenerative Hip Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty. 2020 07; 35(7):1862-1867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  52. Catastrophic failure of a cemented, collarless, polished, tapered cobalt-chromium femoral stem used with impaction bone-grafting. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jun; 81(6):844-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  53. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  54. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Standardized List, Definitions, and Stratification Developed by the Hip Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 06; 474(6):1528-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  55. Let's do a revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2014; 63:239-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  56. Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  57. Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 17; 94(20):1877-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  58. Synovial fluid biomarkers for periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2017-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  59. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  60. External iliac artery injury complicating prosthetic hip resection for infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun; 25(4):660.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  61. Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91(2):350-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  62. The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov; (428):92-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  63. Hip arthroplasty with a collared straight cobalt-chrome femoral stem using second-generation cementing technique: a 10-year-average follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2000 Feb; 15(2):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.