Header Logo

Connection

Craig Della Valle to Reoperation

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Craig Della Valle has written about Reoperation.
Craig Della Valle
Connection Strength
12.312
Reoperation
  1. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age at a Mean of 16 Years: Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Significantly Reduces the Risk of Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S238-S241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.498
  2. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.467
  3. Do higher-volume hospitals provide better value in revision hip and knee arthroplasty? Bone Joint J. 2017 Dec; 99-B(12):1611-1617.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.457
  4. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 01; 33(1):171-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.446
  5. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Mini-Incision Posterior and 2-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2017 08; 32(8):2462-2465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.435
  6. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.406
  7. Does Hip Arthroscopy Affect the Outcomes of a Subsequent Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 07; 31(7):1516-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  8. Is Hypoalbuminemia Associated With Septic Failure and Acute Infection After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Study of 4517 Patients From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplasty. 2016 05; 31(5):963-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  9. Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr; 31(4):846-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  10. Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates in the Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty Are Similar to Those of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty But Are Lower Compared With the Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):339-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.389
  11. The two-stage standard in revision total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):84-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  12. Bisphosphonate Use May be Associated With an Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Hip Fracture. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb; 39(2):448-451.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  13. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S206-S210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  14. High rate of failure after revision extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction. Knee. 2023 Jun; 42:181-185.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  15. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Early Aseptic Loosening in a Large National Database. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7 Suppl 2):S215-S220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  16. The Cost-Effectiveness of Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022 06; 37(6S):S50-S55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  17. General Versus Neuraxial Anesthesia in Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2022 08; 37(8S):S971-S976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  18. Similar 90-day outcomes among inpatient and outpatient arthroplasties : a single-surgeon matched cohort analysis. Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):84-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  19. Costs of unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty : a matched cohort study over ten years. Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):23-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  20. Use of a monoblock dual-mobility acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation. Hip Int. 2022 Sep; 32(5):648-655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  21. Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for Treatment of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 06; 36(6):2171-2177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  22. Revision Surgery for Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Timing Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2021 05; 36(5):1779-1783.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  23. The Optimal Dosing Regimen for Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 04; 102(21):1883-1890.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  24. Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prior Fracture or Osteotomy Around the Knee Leads to Increased Resource Utilization. J Arthroplasty. 2020 12; 35(12):3563-3568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  25. 2020 Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  26. Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020 02; 35(2):538-543.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  27. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct; 34(10):2392-2397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  28. Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 06; 101(3):250-256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  29. Inpatient Versus Outpatient Arthroplasty: A Single-Surgeon, Matched Cohort Analysis of 90-Day Complications. J Arthroplasty. 2019 02; 34(2):221-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  30. The Impact of an Acute, Traumatic Wound Dehiscence on Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 08; 33(8):2613-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  31. Diagnosing Taper Corrosion: When Is It the Taper and When Is It Something Else? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2712-2715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  32. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018 05; 33(5):1309-1314.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  33. High Failure Rates of Concomitant Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Extensor Mechanism Disruption. J Arthroplasty. 2018 06; 33(6):1879-1883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  34. The Alpha-Defensin Test for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Setting of an Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Secondary to a Failed Metal-on-Metal Bearing or Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction. J Arthroplasty. 2018 06; 33(6):1896-1898.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  35. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):11-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  36. Same-Day Discharge Compared with Inpatient Hospitalization Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 06; 99(23):1969-1977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  37. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):766-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  38. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  39. CORR Insights(?): Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 07; 474(7):1627-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  40. Repair of Intraoperative Injury to the Medial Collateral Ligament During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 06; 98(1):35-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  41. The surgical approach for revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan; 98-B(1 Suppl A):113-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  42. How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar; 31(3):596-602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  43. Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):152-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  44. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  45. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  46. Is potential malnutrition associated with septic failure and acute infection after revision total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan; 473(1):175-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  47. Is synovial C-reactive protein a useful marker for periprosthetic joint infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3997-4003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  48. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):229-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  49. What do we know about taper corrosion in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr; 29(4):668-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  50. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  51. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  52. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Should prophylactic antibiotics be withheld before revision surgery to obtain appropriate cultures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan; 472(1):52-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  53. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  54. Outcomes and complications of unicondylar arthroplasty. Clin Sports Med. 2014 Jan; 33(1):149-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  55. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  56. Intra-operative fractures during THA: see it before it sees us. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):26-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  57. The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):126-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  58. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  59. Instability in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 09; 34(9):e519-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  60. What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):1002-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  61. Intraoperative molds to create an articulating spacer for the infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):994-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  62. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Dec; 18(12):760-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  63. Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar; 469(3):839-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  64. Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep; 468(9):2382-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  65. Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):62-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  66. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  67. A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec; 468(12):3348-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  68. Periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee: a problem on the rise but better solutions. Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59:563-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  69. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  70. "An anatomic study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty". J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):640; author reply 640-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  71. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  72. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  73. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May; 446:59-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  74. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  75. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug; 87(8):1795-800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  76. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  77. Periprosthetic sepsis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):26-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  78. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):55-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  79. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  80. Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2022 Aug; 37:162-170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  81. A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec; 16(8):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  82. Independent Risk Factors for Transfusion in Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 08; 36(8):2921-2926.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  83. Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021 07; 36(7):2536-2540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  84. Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Demographics and Management. J Arthroplasty. 2021 05; 36(5):1758-1764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  85. Saline lavage after a "dry tap". Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):138-144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  86. Midterm Results of a Contemporary, Porous-Coated Acetabular System in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Replacement for Degenerative Hip Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty. 2020 07; 35(7):1862-1867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  87. 2019 Mark Coventry Award: A multicentre randomized clinical trial of tranexamic acid in revision total knee arthroplasty: does the dosing regimen matter?. Bone Joint J. 2019 07; 101-B(7_Supple_C):10-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  88. Development and Validation of an Evidence-Based Algorithm for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov; 34(11):2730-2736.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  89. The role of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Jun; 14(4):500-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  90. Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May; 81(5):684-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  91. Risk Adjustment Is Necessary in Value-based Outcomes Models for Infected TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 10; 476(10):1940-1948.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  92. Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Inflammatory Arthritis: Assumption Is the Enemy of True Understanding. J Arthroplasty. 2018 11; 33(11):3561-3566.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  93. Nephrotoxicity After the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7):2225-2229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  94. Systemic Absorption of Antibiotics From Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacers for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 03; 33(3):835-839.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  95. Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions?Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total?Hip?Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S272-S277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  96. Does Prior Cartilage Restoration Impact Outcomes Following Knee Arthroplasty? Orthop Clin North Am. 2017 Jul; 48(3):265-273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  97. The Mark Coventry, MD, Award: Oral Antibiotics Reduce Reinfection After Two-Stage Exchange: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan; 475(1):56-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  98. Leukocyte Esterase: Metal-on-Metal Failure and Periprosthetic Joint?Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2016 10; 31(10):2260-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  99. Primary Repair of Iatrogenic Medial Collateral Ligament Injury During TKA: A Modified Technique. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May; 30(5):854-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  100. Let's do a revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2014; 63:239-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  101. Outcome of one-stage cementless exchange for acute postoperative periprosthetic hip infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct; 471(10):3214-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  102. Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multi-center study. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):45-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  103. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk! J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  104. Intra-operative periprosthetic fractures associated with press fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep; 28(8):1310-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  105. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of proximal femoral remodeling in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May; 28(5):877-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  106. What would you do?: challenges in hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):70-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  107. Hip and knee arthroplasty 2011: what's new, what's true, does it matter? Evidence based issues. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):157-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  108. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  109. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb; 470(2):351-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  110. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 16; 93(22):e130(1-6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  111. Infection control rate of irrigation and d?bridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov; 469(11):3043-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  112. Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:269-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  113. Synovial fluid biomarkers for periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2017-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  114. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  115. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  116. Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91(2):350-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  117. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep; 90(9):1869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  118. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  119. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Dec; 86(12):2694-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  120. Role of knee aspiration after resection of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2001 Apr; 30(4):305-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  121. Catastrophic failure of a cemented, collarless, polished, tapered cobalt-chromium femoral stem used with impaction bone-grafting. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jun; 81(6):844-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.