Header Logo

Connection

Craig Della Valle to Hip Prosthesis

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Craig Della Valle has written about Hip Prosthesis.
Craig Della Valle
Connection Strength
16.227
Hip Prosthesis
  1. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 07; 38(7S):S206-S210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.587
  2. Use of a monoblock dual-mobility acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation. Hip Int. 2022 Sep; 32(5):648-655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.506
  3. Revision Surgery for Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Timing Matter? J Arthroplasty. 2021 05; 36(5):1779-1783.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  4. Atypical Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture and Hip Osteoarthritis Treated with a Revision Monoblock Stem and Strut Allograft: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2020 Jul-Sep; 10(3):e20.00038.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  5. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in the same patient: which do they prefer? Hip Int. 2021 May; 31(3):328-334.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.462
  6. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age at a Mean of 16 Years: Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Significantly Reduces the Risk of Revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S238-S241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  7. High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner. J Arthroplasty. 2018 07; 33(7S):S186-S190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.415
  8. Diagnosing Taper Corrosion: When Is It the Taper and When Is It Something Else? J Arthroplasty. 2018 09; 33(9):2712-2715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.413
  9. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):11-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  10. Aseptic Lymphocytic-Dominated Vasculitis-Associated Lesions Scores Do Not Correlate With Metal Ion Levels or Unreadable Synovial Fluid White Blood Cell Counts. J Arthroplasty. 2017 04; 32(4):1340-1343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.378
  11. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016 09; 31(9 Suppl):131-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  12. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  13. Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr; 31(4):846-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.347
  14. Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):152-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.346
  15. Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan; 31(1):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.345
  16. Reply to the letter to the editor: the 2013 Frank Stinchfield award: diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun; 473(6):2152-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.336
  17. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  18. How do I get out of this jam? Early postoperative problems of primary total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2015; 64:327-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.331
  19. Large diameter femoral heads: is bigger always better? Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):23-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.327
  20. Is synovial C-reactive protein a useful marker for periprosthetic joint infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec; 472(12):3997-4003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  21. What do we know about taper corrosion in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr; 29(4):668-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.312
  22. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  23. The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb; 472(2):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  24. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.304
  25. Hip resurfacing and conventional THA: comparison of acetabular bone stock removal, leg length, and offset. Orthopedics. 2013 May; 36(5):e637-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  26. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb; 471(2):410-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  27. Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb; 28(2):286-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  28. Leukocyte esterase reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):8-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.276
  29. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):710-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  30. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20; 93(14):1355-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  31. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Dec; 18(12):760-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  32. Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep; 468(9):2382-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.245
  33. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):87-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.245
  34. Periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee: a problem on the rise but better solutions. Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59:563-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  35. Interprosthetic fractures of the femur: treatment with a single-locked plate. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb; 25(2):280-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  36. When is the right time to resurface? Orthopedics. 2008 Dec; 31(12 Suppl 2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  37. High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  38. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  39. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  40. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flanged, cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component: evaluation at a minimum of 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Jan; 19(1):23-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  41. The middle-aged patient with hip arthritis: the case for extensively coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Dec; (405):101-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  42. A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec; 16(8):1081-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  43. Similar 90-day outcomes among inpatient and outpatient arthroplasties : a single-surgeon matched cohort analysis. Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):84-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  44. Response to Letter to the Editor on "Midterm Results of a Contemporary, Porous Coated Acetabular System in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Degenerative Hip Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter Study". J Arthroplasty. 2020 11; 35(11):3424-3425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  45. 2020 Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  46. Saline lavage after a "dry tap". Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):138-144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  47. Midterm Results of a Contemporary, Porous-Coated Acetabular System in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Replacement for Degenerative Hip Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty. 2020 07; 35(7):1862-1867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  48. Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2020 06; 35(6S):S359-S363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  49. The role of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Jun; 14(4):500-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  50. Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May; 81(5):684-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  51. Can the use of an inclinometer improve the positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty? Bone Joint J. 2018 07; 100-B(7):862-866.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  52. Synovial Fluid Cell Count for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 03; 99(9):753-759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  53. Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions?Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total?Hip?Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 09; 32(9S):S272-S277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  54. Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Enterococci Have Poor Outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2017 03; 32(3):933-947.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  55. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb; 473(2):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  56. Metal ion levels in maternal and placental blood after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Dec; 43(12):E304-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  57. Dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty: acute management in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec; 32(12):1554.e1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  58. Do young, active patients perceive advantages after surface replacement compared to cementless total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec; 471(12):3803-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  59. Outcome of one-stage cementless exchange for acute postoperative periprosthetic hip infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct; 471(10):3214-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  60. Intra-operative fractures during THA: see it before it sees us. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):26-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  61. What would you do?: challenges in hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):70-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  62. Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 17; 94(20):1877-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  63. Low rate of infection control in enterococcal periprosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct; 470(10):2708-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  64. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19; 94(18):1655-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  65. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 01; 35(7):e1009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  66. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb; 470(2):351-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  67. Treatment of early postoperative infections after THA: a decision analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec; 469(12):3477-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  68. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  69. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  70. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan; 467(1):72-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  71. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan; 467(1):56-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  72. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep; 90(9):1869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  73. Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan; 24(1):49-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  74. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun; 23(4):527-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  75. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Nov; 14(12):646-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  76. A simple method for construction of an articulating antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Sep; 17(6):785-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  77. Imaging of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip and Knee. Semin Roentgenol. 2021 Jan; 56(1):90-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  78. Hip arthroplasty with a collared straight cobalt-chrome femoral stem using second-generation cementing technique: a 10-year-average follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2000 Feb; 15(2):187-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  79. Wear rates of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip implants: a 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Oct; 14(7):781-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  80. Catastrophic failure of a cemented, collarless, polished, tapered cobalt-chromium femoral stem used with impaction bone-grafting. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jun; 81(6):844-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  81. Response to Letter to the Editor on "Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Enterococci Have Poor Outcomes". J Arthroplasty. 2017 08; 32(8):2622-2624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  82. Hip and knee arthroplasty 2011: what's new, what's true, does it matter? Evidence based issues. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):157-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  83. Do patients return to work after hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):92-98.e1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  84. External iliac artery injury complicating prosthetic hip resection for infection. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun; 25(4):660.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  85. Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91(2):350-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  86. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of 24 months' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec; 23(8):1182-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  87. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec; (429):239-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.