Craig Della Valle to Acetabulum
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Craig Della Valle has written about Acetabulum.
Connection Strength
3.318
-
Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 06; 101(3):250-256.
Score: 0.583
-
Can the use of an inclinometer improve the positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty? Bone Joint J. 2018 07; 100-B(7):862-866.
Score: 0.560
-
Hip resurfacing and conventional THA: comparison of acetabular bone stock removal, leg length, and offset. Orthopedics. 2013 May; 36(5):e637-41.
Score: 0.391
-
Porous metal augments: big hopes for big holes. Orthopedics. 2010 Sep 07; 33(9):651.
Score: 0.326
-
Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug; 87(8):1795-800.
Score: 0.229
-
Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar; (420):96-100.
Score: 0.207
-
Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52:281-90.
Score: 0.191
-
Use of a monoblock dual-mobility acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation. Hip Int. 2022 Sep; 32(5):648-655.
Score: 0.168
-
Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr; 31(4):846-9.
Score: 0.115
-
Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 17; 94(20):1877-85.
Score: 0.094
-
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May; 91(5):1130-5.
Score: 0.074
-
Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63.
Score: 0.073
-
Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91(2):350-5.
Score: 0.073
-
High failure rate of a constrained acetabular liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):103-7.
Score: 0.058
-
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun; 86(6):1217-22.
Score: 0.053
-
A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec; 16(8):1081-3.
Score: 0.044
-
Response to Letter to the Editor on "Midterm Results of a Contemporary, Porous Coated Acetabular System in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Degenerative Hip Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter Study". J Arthroplasty. 2020 11; 35(11):3424-3425.
Score: 0.040
-
Midterm Results of a Contemporary, Porous-Coated Acetabular System in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Replacement for Degenerative Hip Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty. 2020 07; 35(7):1862-1867.
Score: 0.039