Header Logo

Connection

Brian Cole to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Brian Cole has written about Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Brian Cole
Connection Strength
9.154
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
  1. Editorial Commentary: Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Medial Meniscal Transplantation Improve Functional Outcomes When Properly Indicated. Arthroscopy. 2023 06; 39(6):1593-1594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.722
  2. Medial Meniscus Transplantation and Bone-Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 01; 30(3):104-110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  3. Return-to-Sport Rate and Activity Level Are High Following Arthroscopic All-Inside Meniscal Repair With and Without Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2021 07; 37(7):2351-2360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.620
  4. Lateral Augmentation Procedures in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomic, Biomechanical, Imaging, and Clinical Evidence. Am J Sports Med. 2019 03; 47(3):740-752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.500
  5. The Influence of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects on Outcomes Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Comparative Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 02; 34(2):519-529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.491
  6. Patient Understanding, Expectations, Outcomes, and Satisfaction Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Surgical Management. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1092-1096.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  7. Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023 09; 39(9):2098-2111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  8. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med. 2022 07; 50(9):2397-2409.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  9. Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score. Arthroscopy. 2022 08; 38(8):2480-2490.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  10. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jul 01; 42(6):e641-e648.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  11. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation May Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2022 07; 38(7):2255-2264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  12. Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6?months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee. 2021 Dec; 33:290-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  13. The Minimally Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time-to-Achievement Analysis. Orthopedics. 2021 Sep-Oct; 44(5):299-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  14. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021 08; 49(10):2589-2598.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  15. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Preference Most Dependent on Patient Age: A Survey of United States Surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2021 05; 37(5):1559-1566.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  16. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res. 2021 02; 39(2):274-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  17. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement. Arthroscopy. 2021 02; 37(2):600-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  18. Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2020 10; 48(12):2978-2985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  19. Preoperative Opioid Use Predicts Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use and Inferior Patient Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2020 10; 36(10):2681-2688.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  20. Return to Sport and Patient Satisfaction After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2020 09; 36(9):2456-2463.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  21. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2394-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  22. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Am J Sports Med. 2019 07; 47(9):2056-2066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  23. Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 08; 47(10):2501-2509.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  24. Dynamic 3-Dimensional Mapping of Isometric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Is Anatomic Also Isometric? Arthroscopy. 2018 08; 34(8):2466-2475.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  25. Arthroscopically Repaired Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears: Patient Demographics, Postoperative Outcomes, and a Comparison of Success and Failure Cases. Cartilage. 2020 01; 11(1):77-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  26. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med. 2018 10; 46(12):2836-2841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  27. Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar; 46(3):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  28. Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep; 45(11):2586-2594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  29. Optimization of Anteromedial Portal Femoral Tunnel Drilling With Flexible and Straight Reamers in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A?Cadaveric 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography?Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2017 May; 33(5):1036-1043.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  30. Quality and Variability of Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols From Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016 08; 32(8):1612-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  31. Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations. Sports Health. 2016 Mar-Apr; 8(2):177-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  32. Risk Factors for Short-term Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar; 44(3):618-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  33. Orthopedic Practice Patterns Relating to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Dec; 44(12):E480-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  34. High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16; 97(18):1529-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  35. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 May; 23(5):283-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  36. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun; 31(6):1185-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  37. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar; 31(3):561-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  38. Closure of patellar tendon defect in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):329-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  39. Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan; 24(1):51-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  40. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb; 31(2):364-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  41. Hamstring autograft versus soft-tissue allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec; 30(12):1616-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  42. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct; 42(10):2363-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  43. Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks. Orthopedics. 2014 Aug; 37(8):e728-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  44. Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014 Nov; 30(11):1491-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  45. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul; 42(7):1583-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  46. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun; 30(6):731-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  47. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19; 96(4):292-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  48. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul; 29(7):1235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  49. Effect of reamer design on posteriorization of the tibial tunnel during endoscopic transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun; 41(6):1282-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  50. Articular and meniscal pathology associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun; 26(3):185-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  51. An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure. J Knee Surg. 2012 May; 25(2):143-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  52. Bony incorporation of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament grafts in an animal model: autograft versus allograft with low-dose gamma irradiation. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):1789-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  53. Sports Performance and Injury Research: Methodologic Limitations and Recommendations for Future Improvements. Arthroscopy. 2020 11; 36(11):2938-2941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  54. Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul; 45(9):2068-2076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.